Bonjour à tous, J'aimerais proposer des améliorations du MEP. Il faudrait plus de liberté que ce soit la position et l'orientation des éléments ou la gestion des brides et des soudures du routage. Pouvoir mettre facilement des brides au niveau des accessoires de canalisation et pas aux coudes par exemple car pour le moment c'est tout ou rien. Pouvoir pivoter n'importe comment un Té ou un accessoire autour de l'axe de sa tuyauterie pour se raccorder sur n'importe quel tuyau provenant d'une autre direction. Enfin améliorer la gestion des petits angles qui mettent des messages d'erreur au lieu d'un coude faiblement cintré. Dans un milieu industriel ou les routages se croisent et se complexifient ces points me semblent essentiels. Show More

I have been using Revit since versions prior to 8.1. Revit has evolved over time but there has been little to no focus for Landscape Architecture. Our Australian Company (Urbis) took on Revit for Landscape back in 2017. We understand Revit was initially designed for Architectural and Engineering Disciplines. I am finding more and more Landscape Company's now use Revit. It would be great that Autodesk can put some focus on Landscape Architecture in Revit.   A good start would be to have the following; a) Softscape Revit Category? b) Hardscape Revit Category? c) A Fence Revit Category? d) A Landscape Tab with some basic tools (see Landscape modelling Notes below)? e) A Landscape Discipline in View Properties?   Landscape Modelling Notes; For Landscape modelling we generally use Architectural Floor and Wall Elements. It be great if the Floor element can be made into a Softscape Catergory. Site Component and Site tools can be added to the Landscape tab. Landscape will use other Architectural elements when required.   This would be a great start for Landscape Architecture for Revit moving forward.   Thanks [Passionate Revit user] Show More

We need some way of automatically creating the keyway that interlocks a foundation wall to a footing.   This is a basic typical building element, and we spend too much time manually inserting this as a detail component on EVERY detail.   Currently the structural wall footing has no way to add a reveal, and the foundation wall cannot cut elements from another category.   Please help. Show More

The current color dialog in Revit is outdated and makes it difficult to efficiently select and manage custom colors. Many users, including myself, find the process of adding new colors unintuitive, especially when it requires overriding existing slots or manually entering RGB values. In today’s design workflows, we often need to match colors from images, PDFs, or other applications, which is not easily possible with the current interface.   Suggestions for Improvement: Modernize the color picker interface to match current design software standards. Add a “pick color from screen” (eyedropper) tool, allowing users to select any color visible on their screen, including from other applications or images. [goto.archi] Expand custom color management: allow more than 16 custom colors, and support saving and organizing palettes. Support HEX codes and popular color books for more flexible color input. Why This Matters: Streamlines workflows and reduces manual steps. Helps maintain design consistency and accuracy. Brings Revit in line with user expectations and industry standards. Show More

Hello there, a few months ago Diroots solved an issue that We have been requesting and are still wating from Autodesk. I wonder why Developers or Autodesk colaborators do not give us a response for this need?   We need to Bind images as ole in dwg file when exporting from Revit.   It is not a ideal way to deliver DWG files with a lot of refernced images. If the same image is placed in many sheets, it will appear many times in the dwg file folder.     Please take our idea and consider it! Show More

Hi,   I would like to propose Autodesk remove the AI assistant released in 2027. In our brief testing, the assistant is laughably bad and lags far, far behind other 3rd-party plugins or LLMs using MCP. Some examples:   It was told to color rooms by area (blue for rooms below 500sf and red for rooms above 500sf). It added one color scheme per room, each scheme named as the room's GUID, and each one colors all rooms blue. This was run on a test model with 300 rooms, it put one entry in the undo list for each room.   It assumes units in feet, even if the project units are metric. If you tell it to use different units, it will respond that it's using the specified units, but ignore them when changing the model.   It does not accurately change the correct parameters when asked. In one test, it input values into "extrusion start" when asked to input to "extrusion end"   Most of the queries of model elements are just...a way to burn tokens instead of making a schedule (that's already in our template). It can also create views and put them on sheets. We've had free plugins to do that for 15+ years that are deterministic, and we used them years ago to set up our template and have very little need to do this on a per-project basis.   It cannot place correct furniture in rooms or lay out apartments like say Finch does. It doesn't provide functionality like Testfit. It doesn't replace any of the tools in pyRevit.   This is why I am proposing Autodesk remove the assistant, or at the very least allow BIM managers to disable it with a UI. For anyone looking to disable it firm-wide right now, you can simply rename or delete the .addin file in C:\Program Files\Autodesk\Revit 2027\AddIns\Assistant       Show More

When creating 2D schematic diagrams using detail lines in Revit, there is no efficient way to remove a segment of a line between two intersecting lines. The existing Trim/Extend tools in Revit only allow trimming a line to a boundary, not between two boundaries in a single action. Requested Feature I would like Autodesk to implement a "Trim Between" function for detail lines, equivalent to AutoCAD's Trim command workflow — where you first select cutting edges, then click on the segment you want to remove. This allows you to delete the portion of a line located between two other lines in a single click. Show More

Please create an uninstall tool for Revit (at least, ideally all products).  I'm aware there's a KB article detailing it, but we shouldn't have to follow these steps manually which look like they could easily be scripted by the company that makes the software. As an admin it's not realistic to manually follow those steps on every user's machine when there's some sort of issue.  Autodesk knows how everything works internally, a tool that can clean up a failed install or corrupted update and delete any remaining files would be amazing. It shouldn't check if something's currently installed, it should check each thing that may have been installed and clean up any leftovers - otherwise it wouldn't detect a failed/corrupted install and would be useless.    I can only imagine how many effort-hours of ICT time this would save.  Show More

Hi. We are working on a huge model with multiple worksets and links. The model is usually loading more then half an hour. While it loads, a popup window appears with information (see attached screenshot). There is no option - the user can not make any decision/influence  at this moment (like abort, choose some option or similar). So I click "close". Then after some time - it appears again. So I click "close" again. Then I open some other work to do while it opens, just to realise that a popup appeared again in the background some time ago.. So I stop doing anything else, and look at the still monitor, waiting to click "close" again at the unpredictible time when it appears. Is it just me, or is it really silly? How would I do it? I would make a popup window at any needed time when the user can infuelce: "Yes/No", "OK/Cancel" and similar. I would load the hole model, with one window after the model loads with multiple warnings and messages. After the (posible review) and confirmation - user can emidiately continue the work. This does not apply on popups that can be used for a decision "Yes/No", "OK/Cancel" and similar. Just on simple one option popups. Cheers, N Show More

Using Revit 2027, I took a measurement using the Measure tool, my typical next step is to highlight the result in the "Total Length" dialog in the Top Tab Bar. Only to find it is now basically grayed out and read-only, cannot highlight and Ctl+C > Ctl+V the result into any other tool dialog, like Move or Copy, like i have been doing with Revit since inception .. can this be reverted or revived? I doublechecked the Measure functionality in Revit 2026, that's how it worked in the previous version.   Very hopeful this is an easy and swift fix. Cheers, Ryan Show More

ADD THE POSSIBILITY FOR MULTILINE, HELPFULL IF YOU NEED BILINGUAL NOTES FOR EXAMPLE, AND GIVE THE POSSIBILITY TO OVERWRITE FORMAT ON INDIVIDUAL FIELDS OR ROWS FOR EXAMPLE RED FOR VARIATIONS OR ANYTHING ELSE. Show More

There should be an option to show the duct and pipe drop/rise symbols ONLY for ducts and pipes that are being cut. Same goes for their line weights. As the architect, it's helpful to see and understand which risers are which via the symbols, but I definitely don't want to see the drop/rise symbols at every change in elevation. The ductwork is often just faded into the background of RCP's, but in doing so, it lacks the graphic cue that one of those rectangles is a riser that's going floor to ceiling. Show More

Just like with Pipes and Ducts, before Revit 2027,  I would like to see an option to create/suggest the layout for Electrical Conduits within an Electrical Circuit.  Now we only have the option to show the 'Path' (farthest or All devices) but not in combination with the actual Conduits to be drawn in the Model. We need Dynamo to covert the Path to Conduits. For Air Terminals and so on there is the option to create a 'Duct/Pipe system' but not for Conduits on which the Layout function is based.   Unfortunately this function (Layout) has been removed for Pipes and Ducts also in the 2027 version. Please bring it back and expand it with the Conduits. Show More

Most text elements we have allow us to customize the format as needed but greatly lacks when using label text in annotation families. We use families for wall types to control the style and look but when needing to use the multi-line text in a family, we get a tiny dialog box and have no access to use a bullet system, or change the font to bold or underlined. Heck, we can't even tab or indent the text. Please make the text within families more powerful and give us the flexibility to format it like the regular text we have.  Show More

hen placing contour labels on a sloped Toposolid Revit does not reliably orient the label text to read uphill — that is, from the lower elevation toward the higher elevation. In standard topographic practice (and in most international drafting standards), contour labels must always be readable from the downhill side, with the text facing upward along the slope. This ensures that anyone reading the drawing can immediately understand the direction of rise without needing additional notation. Currently in Revit: • Label orientation appears to be based on the direction the contour line was generated, not the slope direction. • The "Readability" parameter, where it exists in label families, does not consistently enforce uphill orientation across all contour lines. • Manual flipping of individual labels is the only reliable workaround — which is impractical on any site with more than a handful of contours. • There is no global setting that enforces uphill readability project-wide. --- HOW IT SHOULD WORK The correct behavior would be: 1. A project-level or type-level setting — such as "Readability: Uphill" — that automatically orients every contour label so the text reads from the low side toward the high side. 2. This orientation should update dynamically if the Toposurface is modified. 3. The setting should be accessible and clearly documented, consistent across all contour label family types. This is standard behavior in AutoCAD Civil 3D, where contour label styles include a built-in "Uphill" orientation option that works reliably across the entire surface. --- WHY IT MATTERS Landscape architects, civil engineers, and site planners rely on accurate topographic communication. Incorrectly oriented contour labels are not just an aesthetic issue — they can lead to misreading of site conditions, errors in grading design, and non-compliance with drawing standards required by municipalities and planning authorities. Fixing this would significantly improve Revit's usability for site and landscape design workflows, and bring it in line with industry-standard drafting conventions. I would appreciate this being reviewed by the development team and considered for an upcoming release. Show More

Summary Revit locks phases into a fixed chronological order that cannot be changed after creation. Real projects—especially data centers, utilities, and healthcare renovations—frequently require resequencing due to commissioning paths, outage windows, equipment delays, or field conditions. Today, teams must rebuild phases manually, reassign elements, and repair views and schedules. Request: Add a native capability to reorder phases safely and automatically. 🎥 Video Explanation: I walk through this missing feature, why it matters, and how Auto‑Sequence Phasing would work: https://youtu.be/PQb8OvfRn68   Problem “Revit enforces a fixed phase order that cannot be programmatically or interactively reordered after creation.” This causes: Large amounts of rework Broken phase filters, views, and schedules Misalignment between model and real construction sequence Reduced trust in Revit for 4D or execution‑driven workflows   Proposed Solution: Auto‑Sequence Phasing Enable dynamic phase reordering with automated updates to all dependent data. Key Requirements Drag‑and‑drop phase reordering Automatic remapping of Phase Created / Phase Demolished Safe updates to phase filters, view templates, schedules, and sheets Preview/audit mode before committing changes API support for automation Consistent behavior for linked models   Why It Matters This is a core data model limitation, not a workflow tweak. Utilities validate the need; data centers amplify it. Benefits: Eliminates manual phase rebuilds Reduces documentation churn Maintains 4D alignment when sequencing changes Improves as‑built accuracy Expands Revit’s value in sequencing‑driven industries Show More

Some parameters, are not shown in Properties Panel even though it is a valid value for the specified element. Ex.: Structural Foundations does not show built in Volume parameter in Properties Panel. So for a rapid value check you need to create a entire schedule, just to see an element Volume value. Structural Columns does not show built in Length parameter in Properties Panel. So for a rapid value check you need again to create a entire schedule, just to see an element Length value.   Every existing parameter should be available in Properties Panel, and if there are too much of them, allow user to select which ones will appear. Show More

Revitの重ね壁はインスタンス・タイプパラメータの設定が出来ない仕様となっております。 他の壁と同じようにパラメータ設定ができるように改修をお願いしたいです。 Show More