how come is it possible that user cannot control the visibility of the Tags from attached model (in grey color) in the meaning : "what is below and what is on top" ?  (even i have attached model as an "underlay") design for sheets in final state looks very messy though    please call for action to do with this silly issue something Show More

Currently, when the "Use Annotation Scale" option is enabled in a Revit family, Filled Regions (such as hatch patterns or 2D filled shapes) become completely invisible, even if they are properly assigned to the Coarse Detail Level. This limitation affects the clarity and customization of 2D symbolic graphics within families, especially when users want to create symbolic representations that scale with the view but also require graphical fill elements using Filled Regions. 🚫As of now, there is no native way for a Filled Region to coexist with annotation scaling behavior, which forces users to replace those elements with Symbolic Lines. This is not always feasible when more graphic detail is required. 📌Suggestion: Enable Filled Regions to remain visible when "Use Annotation Scale" is turned on, or provide a visibility toggle in the element’s properties. Alternatively, allow Filled Regions to behave like annotative elements in the family environment, similar to how Detail Items or Symbolic Lines do. ✅This would improve graphical flexibility when creating custom symbols in families, without breaking graphical consistency when the view scale changes. Thank you for considering this improvement! This functionality would be valuable for architects, MEP designers, and all Revit users working with symbolic 2D family graphics. Show More

The electrical panels now have feed through lugs and the option for continuous numbering. This needs to be applied to all panel schedules, not just power panels. Specifically, we should be able to make a schedule for each communication patch panel and be able to have continuous numbering throughout the communications rack. Show More

Adding shared parameters you should be able to select all and add to a family at one time. Instead of having to add each one individually. Show More

The ability to set a slope in a plan region similar to setting it for a floor. Ensuring that a sloped floor adjusts the plan region accordingly to match its slope. Show More

Allow nested Generic Annotations (e.g., text or symbols) in families to remain visible when hosted on sloped or non-level surfaces. Currently, these annotations disappear unless hosted on a level, making them unusable for sloped elements like pipes. Adding this functionality would improve clarity, streamline workflows, and eliminate the need for inefficient workarounds like using Model Text, which is not ideal for annotations.   Show More

Multi-users working for the project model, the model has the preset profiles for automated weekly progress including publishing to ACC 2d and 3d view sets, printing PDFs, CAD Exports, and previous discipline submission sets. The selected set (checked) easily changes by less experienced or intern users causing the wrong views in ACC output, pdf prints for weekly progress.  The publish select set needs a lock or control by the template. Show More

Prior to upgrading the current project we are working in from Revit 2022 to Revit 2025, we were able to drag MEP parts from the node on either end of the fitting as long as it was an independent piece and unattached to another. After upgrading to 2025, this function is no longer possible. The current work around is to drag the piece you want to adjust from where it is connected, set it aside, make the modifications, then use the create similar function and reattach the cloned part, then delete the old one. Prior to the upgrade you could have drug the piece set it aside, make changes then drag it back over by the node and reattach. Much simpler and faster that way. Now any independent piece only allows the quick connect function from the node after being placed or disconnected. Bringing back the old function allowing us to drag MEP parts from the node would be very beneficial and much more efficient.  Show More

would be great if this could happen  Show More

I suggest that we have an option of "hard modelling" for MEP pipes and ducts that when turned on, placing a pipe or a duct in a 2D view or a 3D view will check immediately for clashes with other MEP elements in the model, and suggest changing the level for example or just giving a warning at least. If people are restricted from the beginning not to clash, we will never end up with thousands of clashes that will never be able to solve one by one. I understand that this option might slow down the drafting process but it can be optional also. Especially in cases where clashes have a high priority compared to modelling speed this option would be very beneficial. It can also attach a property to the element indicating if it was created using the "hard modelling" option or no so that we can know, if later on a clash is detected with that element, what or who is the reason. Show More

At this point in time the only supported wire sizing in Revit is AWG (American Wire Gauge). This is stopping electrical engineers using the metric system from using the power of the Revit electrical functions. On the Autodesk help site there is a full article on with the tables for the correction and impedance factors for the different wire sizes known in the USDM(United States domestic market) https://help.autodesk.com/view/RVT/2019/ENU/?guid=GUID-0F801DCD-18CD-4B7A-A64F-D4D9E8A4CEA9#GUID-0F801DCD-18CD-4B7A-A64F-D4D9E8A4CEA9__WS1A9193826455F5FF-4F6D1F1D11D24BE3E03C1B   If these tables would also be implemented for metric sizing, then this would allow for the use of the following: - The parameter voltage drop can function properly    this does not function at all when working with any sizing table then in the help article above. - Use the wire size functions as intended    because the voltage drop parameter does not work the calculations made when upscaling wiring due to the length of the wire does not function at all.    the sizing will automatically adjust when the rating of the circuit was to change  - use wire types as intended   there is no way to use the wire types as intended because wire size does not work, the only workaround is to use a text parameter to display the cable or make a list of all the wire type and wire size combinations with a list of hundreds of wire types as a result.   With the BIM way of thinking this would keep the information combined in Revit, and would minimize the chance for mistakes.       Show More

Wouldn't it be good if revit was able to pick up snap points of fab mep like end point of pipe (without having to be at the end of the pipe) edge of the containment etc    be good if the snaps worked it does in cad  Show More

With families being needed to have more parameters added.  An enhancement to have additional data parameters to connectors is needed.  This can help when adding additional parameters to the connection for designers ability to determine what is needed Show More

Please update ceiling based light fixture families so that they can snap to ceiling grid lines. Currently, face based families can align/snap to grids while being placed, but they do not automatically move with the ceiling grid when it is shifted. The ceiling based lighting fixture families do "stick" with the grid when it is shifted, which is great, but they do not align/snap to it (nor do they rotate) while being placed. Show More

Within our MEP office, it seems one of the primary challenges we've had with the integration of Revit is the lack of electrical functionality when it comes to project phasing. Various components of this have been suggested over the years, but it seems like the ask could be simplified as follows:    Provide project phasing for electrical circuitry. In the real world, circuits existing in a place and time like all other model geometry, so it doesn't make sense that they are handled like annotations/analytical calculations that exist only in the scope of work.  Allow for use of phase filters on electrical panel schedules.  This allows for a designer to display and existing and revised condition. This is typically displayed on every project that involves modifying the loads associated with a panel.  I am aware that there are work arounds using Excel or Drafting views, but this is definitely a hang up every time we train a new electrical drafter/designer.  Show More

It was pointed out to me by one of my Mechanical Engineers this morning that the Mechanical equipment Behind Walls is showing in their sections.  I know patterns we can turn off in the V/G Overrides by hiding the surface patterns of the category.   In this image there is a Architectural and a Structural link. The Architectural and Structural content should be  blocking the Air Handling Unit and behind the wall though. If I'm missing a setting or something please let me know 😊. There are a couple different Hacks, like setting the view to Coordination, but then you have to apply a bunch of overrides you wouldn't have to if it was kept as Mechanical. Also, when set to Coordination, you loos your "MEP Settings" settings (Hidden Lines, Gaps, etc...).     I posted about something similar to this in 2020 too....  https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/visibility-of-architectural-surface-patterns-when-view-is-set-to/idi-p/9725053   Show More

We are beginning to receive project requirements with increased LOD requirements and model deliverables, but it is proving to be impossible to deliver on these requirements due to lack of functionality in Revit's electrical circuiting capability. One primary shortcoming is Revit's inability to model double ended unit substations in a main-tie-main configuration. The primary disconnect section, the transformer section, and distribution sections can all be modeled individually and circuited together, but there is no way to tie both distribution sections together to share load. You would expect that a second connector added to the distribution section family could be circuited to an additional connector of the other distribution section, but this results in an error message stating that, "There is a circular chain of references among the highlighted elements." It would be great if a new variation of circuit or electrical "Tie" connector could be created that could take the connected load of the 2 family's, sum them together, and pass them upstream to the primary connector. See PDF attachment for additional explanation. Show More

Revit runs slow when linking large models like architectural or structural files because it brings in extra data, such as materials and properties, that is unnecessary for work. Autodesk should add an Optimized Link Mode that keeps only the important parts for viewing and coordination, removing unnecessary details. This will make Revit faster and easier to use. Show More

We like to use the flex pipes of Revit to simulate flex hoses to sprinklers. For hydraulic calculation of sprinkler system in this case it is necessary to have an inner and an outer diameter of this flex pipe like in pipes. So it would be good if this could be realized in further version. Show More