It would be nice to have a checkbox, similar to all over tabs in Visibility/Graphic Overrides "Show Revit Links in this view" from where you could just disable all Revit links. In my case, I would linke this since we have many linked files all the time but some views need to show only elements in the model. Of course there could be a workflow where I would use placeholder links or Worksets for links, but all things considered, I see no reason to not just have a check box, would make things easier in many cases.   See attached images.   Show More

It would be very useful to have room color schemes work in Area plans. In large multi-family projects, we often need to show the Areas (apartment rooms calculated to the shape required by local housing guidelines, not to the wall boundary) of an area plan and the Room (total apartment SF) area on the same plan, and we would like to color them based on the apartment type. In our housing projects, we encourage the use of area plans for all plans since we always need to show 2 layers of information. Having to remake floor plans and lose info when we need to show a color scheme is very frustrating.  Show More

Civil infrastructure like bridges, tunnels, retaining walls are mostly in complex alignments with multiple spirals, curves, lines. When you need to show longitudinal section of the structure its impossible. We can not make accurate formworks drawings due to that. We can not show rebar distribution in longitudinal section, when element is in any type of curve. When we need to annotate section of any adaptive component, dimensions are snapped to first start or end of the element, not the vie of the section.   Show More

Please add quickly the tool to crop any image format inside Revit : Jpeg, PNG, PDF.... This would be a simple but very useful tool to ajust images in sheets, and a very time saving.    Thank you very mutch ! We wait for this from long date in my Architecture company. Vincent Show More

This should be an easy one. I know something similar has been suggested but nothing was ever implemented. We have the option to select text and convert to all caps, but it would be helpful to be able to toggle all caps (via the highlighted button or similar) within revit so that any text that you input is uppercase. It's been a standard for a long time that annotations are in uppercase.   I have an old habit of looking at the keyboard for the first 5 words or so. This always results in me re-typing those first 5 words, usually when I switch to another program. Revit is literally the only program that I would ever use all caps in.   I know it seems minor to most that read this, but I would be willing to bet that there are a ton of us with this same issue. In the big picture, it is minor, but it seems like it would be an incredibly easy feature to implement for one of the talented engineers at Autodesk.      Show More

One of the biggest sources of error in BIM is manual type naming. A simple yet powerful improvement would be a native Revit feature that allows users to auto-generate Type Names by concatenating selected parameters.   For example, a window type name could be built from: [Width] - [Height] - [Frame Material] → 1200 - 1500 - Alum   This would: Reduce manual errors Enforce consistent naming Make schedules and tags more reliable   Ideally, the Revit template could select 2–3 parameters in the Family Editor or Type Properties dialog, choose a separator, and have Revit build the name automatically.    BIM is only as good as the data we put in — and naming mistakes shouldn't compromise that.   Would love to hear if others see value in this or have workarounds without dynamo work arounds.  Show More

  Dear Autodesk Revit Development Team, I would like to suggest an enhancement for the Cut Profile tool. Currently, when we use the Cut Profile tool, the lines are drawn with only one default line style. However, in many real-world documentation scenarios, we need to adjust the line style of these profile cuts to match different drafting standards or graphical representations. Unfortunately, the Linework tool does not affect Cut Profile lines, and there is no way to change their style after creating them. Therefore, I strongly recommend adding an option to select a Line Style when drawing or editing a Cut Profile. This would provide more control and flexibility for producing clean, standard-compliant drawings. Thank you for considering this improvement for future versions of Revit. Best regards, GHASEM   Show More

Add a current phase option to the Select All feature for when the change only applies to one phase of the project. Show More

In many real-world refurbishment projects, when a door is removed from an existing wall, the resulting opening is often retained—or filled in a way that differs from the original wall construction. In Revit, however, demolishing an existing door automatically triggers an “infill” behavior that closes up the opening with the original wall type. This is both unrealistic and irreversible, forcing users to accept an unwanted wall patch. In actual practice, once a door is removed, the opening may remain as-is, be filled with a different wall type, or be repurposed in other ways. Having Revit automatically restore the original wall type is counterproductive and does not reflect typical site operations. It also removes the ability to keep a true opening without cumbersome workarounds. Proposed Solution User-Controlled Infill Settings Provide a setting (at either the project or element level) that allows users to choose whether an opening should remain or be automatically infilled when an existing door is demolished. Let users specify which wall type (if any) is used to fill the opening. Flexible Phase Behavior When a door is demolished in the Existing phase, give the user the option to leave the opening intact or fill it with a new wall. If the user wants to keep the opening or place a different wall, Revit should not force the infill to match the original wall type. Better Alignment with Real-World Workflows This change would more closely mirror actual construction processes, saving time and effort in creating workarounds or re-modeling openings. It would also provide clearer phasing documentation and more accurate takeoffs for demolition and new work. By introducing a user-defined or project-wide “Preserve Opening” setting, Revit’s demolition workflow would become more flexible and realistic, significantly improving modeling efficiency for renovation and refurbishment projects. Show More

When creating families in Revit, it becomes apparent that the program does not retain the settings in the Properties / Family Types window. Specifically: The column width distribution. The zoom level within the window. Each time this window is reopened, these settings are reset to their default values. As a result, users must manually adjust the view every time, which is time-consuming and disrupts the workflow. Suggestion: It would be a valuable improvement if Revit could remember these settings per session or per family. This would significantly enhance the user experience, especially for those who work extensively with families. Show More

Add the Circuit Prefix parameter in the options to define a Circuit Naming rule. Show More

This image says it all. Right now, only the "Free End" option for leaders allows snapping to the endpoints of the leaders. This should also be a default for "Attached End".    Show More

In the Circuit Naming window, add duplicate option, specialy for other disciplines, it is helpful. Show More

Would be ideal to be able to find products easy on keynote dialoge box. Please add the search button Also would be ideal to be able to dimension wall type legends and also rather than limiting to plan and section (for wall legends) please create facility to generate elevations legend.  Show More

It would be a nice addition to Revit Schedules to have OR filter capabilities similar to what has been added to normal View Filters. This would greatly increase are filtering capabilities, especially when scheduling items from Linked Models. In our case we often generate Revit based drawing lists that include elements from linked models, but often do not want to include items from all linked models. Also reducing the need for Shared Parameters for simple filtering and organization.   View Filter Option added for Filtering Asking for OR option similar to that of view filters Show More

Would it be possible to create a landscape specific filter list. This would be beneficial in visibility / graphics to show all things helpful and useful for landscape Architects to use. Instead of having lots of stuff we have to turn of and trail through.  Show More

We work as a contractor in major maintenance of existing residential buildings — replacing façades, window frames, roofs, and technical installations. As a team, we model the existing buildings in Revit, and the renovation plans are developed in a new phase.   It would save us a lot of time if we could work in groups and assign certain elements to a demolition phase, with those changes being automatically reflected across all groups. This would streamline coordination and prevent duplication of effort.   Additionally, rooms in Revit are phase-dependent. Is there a way to link rooms more flexibly to phases, so we can visualize them both in the existing and the new situation? This would help us manage spatial data across different project phases more effectively Show More

In Revit 2022, we could use the Shift key to select all the Revit links and unload the files at once. However, in Revit 2025, I`m no longer able to do this. I cannot click the unload button when I select multiple files, so I have to unload each file one by one, this is quite time-consuming, CAD links doesn`t have this issue, so I`m wondering if Revit links can be fixed?    And one more thing I`d like to suggest, would it be possible to allow adding multiple Revit files at once (for example, use Shift to select all files)? so that we don`t have to add each link file one by one.   Thank you very much. Show More