Linking IFC files is a fundamental workflow when working with external models in Autodesk Revit. When an IFC file is linked from a local drive, Revit automatically generates an IFC.RVT file. This file is maintained by Revit and gets updated whenever the IFC link is refreshed. However, the workflow behaves differently in cloud projects hosted on Autodesk Construction Cloud (ACC). When an IFC is linked in a cloud project, Revit also generates an IFC.RVT, but this file becomes a regular Revit file instead of a cloud model. Because of this, the model is not included when using publishing settings for ACC in the Revit Central File. As a Sample, a Electrical Central File is published in ACC and we don't see the Architect in ACC Viewer. As a result: The linked IFC is not visible in the ACC viewer. The only workaround is to manually download the generated IFC.RVT from the IFC, upload it again as a Cloud Model, and then link it again in the cloud project. This creates unnecessary manual steps and breaks the expected workflow. Suggested Improvement When an IFC is linked in a Revit Cloud Project, the automatically generated IFC.RVT should: be created directly as a Cloud Model in Autodesk Construction Cloud be automatically updated when the IFC link is refreshed This would allow teams and stakeholders without Revit to correctly view the complete model, including IFC references, directly in ACC. Such a workflow would significantly improve collaboration and support the full use. Show More

Having a toggle to include/remove titleblocks when exporting to dwg would be helpful, and a time saver.   When providing .dwgs to contractors or specialty consultants, there are often times when I want to export whole sheets with view titles (for clarity), but I don't want the titleblock included in the dwg that is provided for various reasons. Being able to toggle off the titleblock easily would save me having to open each sheet dwg to remove the titleblock from the layout and the block from the file. Show More

Hello there, a few months ago Diroots solved an issue that We have been requesting and are still wating from Autodesk. I wonder why Developers or Autodesk colaborators do not give us a response for this need?   We need to Bind images as ole in dwg file when exporting from Revit.   It is not a ideal way to deliver DWG files with a lot of refernced images. If the same image is placed in many sheets, it will appear many times in the dwg file folder.     Please take our idea and consider it! Show More

I would like to map IFC classes when linking IFC to Revit subcategories as this is possible when I open an IFC. The IFC import options do not take effect on linking. Or am I missing something.      Show More

Transparency Settings for Filled Regions Currently, when using detail groups with filled regions across multiple drawings, the transparency settings applied through graphic overrides do not copy over. This creates inconsistency and increases the risk of human error. If we had the ability to assign a percentage of transparency directly to filled regions, it would: Ensure consistent visual representation across all drawings. Reduce reliance on graphic overrides. Minimize manual adjustments and errors when copying detail groups. This feature would greatly improve workflow efficiency and maintain design clarity Show More

Coordination Models could be a powerful workflow for large projects. They load faster than standard Revit links, feel more lightweight, and the model comparison feature is easy to use even for less experienced users. For multi-gigabyte models, this could be an important way to reduce Revit load and improve performance.   Right now, the visual limitations make it difficult to use Coordination Models in real projects.   What works well • Models load faster than standard Revit links • Basic model comparison works and is easy to use • Good concept for large projects • Useful that you can see which model version is currently used in the Coordination Model   Current issues • Geometry and edges are not displayed accurately • Large coordinates cause elements to jump, distort, or display incorrectly • MEP models and architectural models show graphic errors • No annotations or dimensions are possible • Display settings like shadows do not improve readability   Important note With IFC Data Exchange it is already possible to filter models in Docs and load them in a simplified form. Tagging and dimensions even work there. This shows that these capabilities are technically achievable. Coordination Models would benefit greatly from similar functionality.   Goals / Requests • Fix the display issue so elements render correctly • Ensure that annotations and dimensions work once the display issue is resolved • If a direct solution is not possible, provide a workflow similar to IFC Data Exchange, where models can be filtered before linking and annotations or dimensions remain usable   Many users would adopt Coordination Models immediately if these issues were resolved. Improving this feature would make it truly valuable for large-scale BIM projects.   Notes regarding screenshots Overview of the Revit MEP model Original Revit families in the MEP model Display issue in the Coordination Model view of the same MEP model Same issue when linking the architectural model as a Coordination Model Comparison overview The model comparison feature is a great direction for authors, but at this stage it provides mainly a graphical overview and little actionable information. Show More

I’ve recently relocated to the US from the UK, so this is an issue I hadn’t encountered before. Revit’s inability to export in US Survey Feet creates significant problems when sharing DWG exports with anyone working outside Autodesk tools. This topic was last seriously discussed about a decade ago, yet the problem still persists. As long as clients continue specifying these units, the issue isn’t going away. Show More

I would like to be able to organize added filters in view templates to be organized alphabetically automatically upon adding them to the Filters tab. As is now they have to be manually moved up and down to sort. Even if it is not automatic, it would still be of great benefit to be able to sort with a "Sort A-Z" button. The Filters dialog to edit/ create filters does this already, why can it not be extended into the V/G Overrides for Filters in View Templates/ Settings.  Show More

The Revit Issues Add‑In is a powerful tool for viewing and resolving Autodesk Construction Cloud issues directly in the authoring environment. It works well for syncing issue data, responding to comments, and closing the loop between ACC and Revit. However, when working in large or federated Revit models, the experience breaks down around model context and visibility. Today, when an issue is opened through the Revit Issues Add‑In—especially one created from another discipline’s model or from a federated coordination space—the user is often taken to a generic view or a fallback view with limited context. In many cases, the user must manually create section boxes, isolate elements, or adjust view settings just to understand where the issue is and what it relates to. This adds friction and slows down resolution, particularly on complex projects with multiple linked models. What’s missing is automatic, issue‑driven sectioning within Revit. When an issue has a known location, pushpin, or viewpoint, the Revit Issues Add‑In should be able to automatically generate a temporary or dedicated section box (or 3D context view) centered on the issue location. This sectioning should work not only in the active model, but also across associated and federated Revit models, so users can immediately see the issue in context regardless of which discipline authored the geometry. Making auto‑sectioning part of the Revit Issues Add‑In workflow would significantly reduce manual setup, improve clarity, and make issue resolution faster and more consistent. This would be especially valuable for coordination, QA/QC, and consultant workflows where users frequently review issues originating outside their own model. Enabling automatic sectioning for issues would greatly improve the day‑to‑day usability of the Revit Issues Add‑In and better support real‑world federated model workflows. Show More

When we open a Revit model using the standard File > Open dialog, the preview panel shows the Revit version in which the file was last saved. This is extremely helpful when working with multiple projects and different Revit releases, because we can immediately see whether the selected RVT file matches our current Revit version. However, when we use Insert > Link Revit and select an RVT file, the same preview panel does not display the file’s save version. Only the thumbnail of the model is shown. In many BIM workflows (multi-discipline teams, consultants, external links), we often need to check: Which Revit version was the link file last saved in Whether linking this file will trigger an upgrade Whether we should ask the consultant to send a model in another version Currently, to see the saved version, we have to either: Open the file directly first (which may upgrade it unintentionally), or Use external tools just to check the RVT version. --Proposed improvement Please add the “Saved in Revit Version” info to the preview panel of the Import/Link RVT dialog, similar to the standard Open dialog. For example: Under the thumbnail, show a line such as: Saved in: Revit 2023 or Saved in: Revit 2024.2 ** Benefits Faster decision-making when linking consultant models Avoid unwanted file upgrades during linking Clearer coordination in multi-version / multi-project environments Consistent UX between Open and Link Revit dialogs This is a small UI enhancement, but it would save time and prevent mistakes for many BIM coordinators and Revit users working with multiple versions every day. Thank you for considering this improvement.   Show More

In Revit 2025 and 2026, the “Content Catalog – Launch as App” and “Launch in Browser” options are effectively useless unless you have an active US hub with the Content Catalog enabled.   Other regions, for example, the EU, are not supported by this add‑in, which makes these buttons non-functional. The only reliable way to access the Content Catalog is to open it manually in your preferred web browser.   Please avoid assuming that the US region is the only region that matters. Show More

Revit LT has everything I need , almost... Can't you allow rendering software plugins, like Twinmotion (and others) I'd even be willing to pay for it. Show More

Currently, the setup of the default setting for open Worksets is possible only when saving a new central file. The alternative is to use the Options while opening the file, which must be adjusted each time.     The suggested functionality will be to have the opportunity to change the default settings for open Workset for an active central file without creating a new central. This would avoid the creation of a new central file and thus maintain the version history and the link connection between the files.   Show More

A system-defined way to manage visibility of clearance zones. Yes, we can all be out here adding clearance zones to various families, but on projects with lots of consultants, this leads to hunting down lots of different object styles across multiple categories to turn them on or off.  Show More

AI-powered Clash Detection with automatic resolution suggestions Show More

Hello Autodesk Team,   Linking coordination models from Autodesk Construction Cloud (ACC) into Revit 2025 and above is very slow. It appears that Revit continuously downloads the Navisworks file at a very low speed, causing long delays and reduced productivity.   This also results in very slow navigation in views (panning, zooming, and orbiting).   It does not feel like a one-time sync. Instead, the Navisworks model seems to keep downloading in the background. Show More

Please allow the revit template to hold predefined worksets. We use worksets in 100% of our projects and everytime we have to recreate them manualy (we don like the method to create project with worksets and use/copy that as it is prone for mistakes) Worksets are invaluable part of our workflow.   Show More

Implement a feature in Revit that allows users to define and apply custom naming rules for DWG exports Show More