Allow pinned ACC projects on Revit Home Screen on the left side panel under Autodesk Projects or BIM 360 or anything else the call it depending on the Revit version.   Recent files on the home page are good but users also must browse to the file location to execute publishes and stuff.  Would be super helpful. Show More

When uploading parameters to the Autodesk Cloud Parameter Service today, users have no way to choose which parameters to transfer when selecting 'active model'. Instead, they must resort to work-arounds: Clean the model. Strip out every unwanted parameter so that only the ones you want remain, then upload. Use a Shared Parameter file. But this sacrifices the convenience of the “Active Model” option (see red rectangle in screenshot). Proposed Workflow Upload to Cloud Parameter Service User selects Active Model (or Shared Parameter File / Text-File Import). Ask user for confirmation to get all parameters from the model Display a multi-select list of all shared parameters in the model. Adjust Categories Give the user the option to change the applied categories for each shared parameter (for example to add revit categories which become available in new revit versions. Give the user the option to change standard categories in the properties menu, like Identity Data, Underlay, Graphics, etc. Final Confirmation from the user to transfer the shared parameters to the Cloud Parameter Service   Steps 4–6 would also be useful when importing from a Shared Parameter file, as this format has no category-and-property metadata. (Or add an extra option to the import method where the user can select a textfile with the extra data (like category-and-property metadata) Show More

✨ Problem: When editing a loaded family in a Revit project, upon reloading it back into the project, Revit only gives us two options: Overwrite the existing family and its parameter values. Overwrite the existing family but preserve existing parameter values. However, both options replace the original family and do not allow keeping the original version. This can lead to lost data, unintended changes in the model, and lack of version control. --- 🎯 Proposal: Add a third option when reloading a family: > ✅ “Keep Both Versions” – Revit keeps the original version in the project and loads the new one with a suffix or user-defined name, such as: FamilyName_v2 or FamilyName_Modified   --- 🛠️ Suggested Behavior: When reloading a modified .rfa, show this dialog: > Do you want to: 1️⃣ Overwrite the existing family and its parameters 2️⃣ Overwrite the family but keep existing parameter values 3️⃣ ✅ Keep both versions (rename the new one to FamilyName_Copy or prompt for new name)   Show More

The Revit Issue Add-in is a great idea for collaborating on models using ACC. You can view issues created by other users directly in Revit, which helps you resolve them or simply improves communication. As I mentioned, the concept is excellent — but the practical use in 2D is limited. You can view and create issues in 3D, which is great for coordination, but not precise enough for creating project documentation. That’s where 2D would be ideal. Unfortunately, you can’t create issues in 2D views, which defeats the main purpose of the Revit Issue Add-in. You still have to open a web browser to create those issues, which goes against the core idea of the add-in — allowing Revit users to manage issues without leaving the software (or at least not as often). I believe that the ability to create issues directly in 2D views would be appreciated by a large number of users, and without this feature, I don't consider the add-in to be complete. Show More

Revit LT has everything I need , almost... Can't you allow rendering software plugins, like Twinmotion (and others) I'd even be willing to pay for it. Show More

We have a building with wings that are at slightly different angles.  It would be helpful to have more than one project north so that we could work more effectively from one view to another by selecting the particular project north for that view.  The only alternative that I can think of is rotating the crop region for a particular view to have xy easier to work with.  Show More

Most improvements in new Revit versions, while beneficial, often consist of minor adjustments that could easily be included in an upgrade or service pack. Adopting this approach would allow more time and focus for deeper, more meaningful enhancements. It would also help standardise the software version used across different projects. Currently, the constant release of new versions leads to several issues: Projects often rely on different Revit versions, creating inconsistencies; Multiple installations take up significant disk space; Upgrading families and project files becomes more complex; Opening older projects can be confusing or problematic. Additionally, a typical construction project — from early design stages to completion — usually spans around four years. This means users often end up having at least four different Revit versions installed simultaneously, just to keep up.   One ideia could be to release a new version every two years for example. Show More

  When linking an IFC4 file in Revit, it would be beneficial to have the ability to map the IFC Renovation Status to a Revit Phase, or to have an alternative method to utilize IFC phasing.   Currently, when an IFC file is linked in Revit, all phasing information is disregarded. Correcting this issue requires significant workaround efforts. Additionally, if the IFC file is updated, the phasing corrections need to be reapplied, rendering the 'link' option and IFC4 impractical when phasing is utilized within the file.   Show More

Currently, the setup of the default setting for open Worksets is possible only when saving a new central file. The alternative is to use the Options while opening the file, which must be adjusted each time.     The suggested functionality will be to have the opportunity to change the default settings for open Workset for an active central file without creating a new central. This would avoid the creation of a new central file and thus maintain the version history and the link connection between the files.   Show More

Multi-users working for the project model, the model has the preset profiles for automated weekly progress including publishing to ACC 2d and 3d view sets, printing PDFs, CAD Exports, and previous discipline submission sets. The selected set (checked) easily changes by less experienced or intern users causing the wrong views in ACC output, pdf prints for weekly progress.  The publish select set needs a lock or control by the template. Show More

When selecting projects in Desktop Connector, having a search option would be highly beneficial. It would help users quickly locate the desired projects, especially in large organizations where multiple projects are listed. @rishav.sarkar@autodesk.com Show More

Implement a feature in Revit that allows users to define and apply custom naming rules for DWG exports Show More

In Revit versions 2023, 2024, and 2025, I noticed that it is no longer possible to export the category information when using the export option defined from a property set, and this feature was very important for my workflow. I have several applications that fill in information in the IFC and relied on this parameter to classify according to the category. I would like to understand why this feature was removed and if there is a possibility of including it again in future versions. Show More

In visibility graphics in most tabs, you can turn off showing that that tab with one check box. But its not possible with Revit links. When I created a federate model view in Model Coordination on ACC, all models should have a clean view with no link. But this is extremely difficult to maintain if you have more than a dozen models. It would be much easier to have the ability to uncheck that box and hide all Revit links rather manually updating it when a new link is added. Show More

Add the ability to filter elements based on the Revit link file that they are located in. For example, this could be used to filter out any levels or grid lines from linked models. This can currently be achieved by editing view properties for Revit links, but this needs to be done for each link, which can be time consuming for large projects and needs to be maintained as new models are added to the project, while the ability to filter would be applied universally. Show More

Please allow the revit template to hold predefined worksets. We use worksets in 100% of our projects and everytime we have to recreate them manualy (we don like the method to create project with worksets and use/copy that as it is prone for mistakes) Worksets are invaluable part of our workflow.   Show More

hi   For the Transfer Project Standards feature, similar to the Purge tool, add a list that displays the types for each category. This way, during the Transfer Project Standards process, we can select only the types we need from the desired categories. Currently, it transfers all types, which often leads to confusion, increased file size, and model management issues.   Show More

The subject about says it all, but it would be a huge time-saver to include this. I can't say how many times I've had staff print me a set missing links because they hadn't added the project in Desktop Connector and loaded the links. Show More

Ability to create chainage lines and elevations like Civil 3D: Civil 3D Station and Elevation table Export - Simple (youtube.com)   related: Flattened curved elevations - autodesk   This can be used in large civil projects like bridge design... Show More