Can we have a simple toggle somewhere that lets us only show sheet numbers and not Sheet Number + Sheet Title while in revit. This would allow us to have more windows open when working through sheets in a set. I know what's on the sheet, I only need the number typically. Show More

In Revit 2024 through 2026, the new Linked Toposolids functionality produces only an approximate representation of published Civil 3D topography surfaces when datasets exceed 50,000 points. This is a significant regression from previous Revit versions.   Using the same Civil 3D dataset, we have compared Revit 2023 Linked Topography (Toposurface) and Revit 2026 Linked Toposolids. Attached imagery clearly demonstrates the geometric discrepancies between the two. The Revit 2023 workflow produced an accurate representation of the source surface, while the current Linked Toposolid implementation does not.   Why this is an issue: An approximate terrain surface is not acceptable for infrastructure projects such as: Bridges Marine structures Transport infrastructure The current behaviour introduces design and construction risk, particularly because: Users may not realise the surface is approximate Levels, set‑out, and clearances may be taken from incorrect geometry On Current projects, our teams are being forced to: Abandon Revit topography workflows entirely, reverting to IFC or DWG‑based workflows. This is a regression in coordination, documentation, and productivity. Maintain legacy software versions (Revit 2023) solely to preserve surface accuracy. This is not sustainable long‑term and risks losing AutoDesk support. Impacts: Increased coordination effort between Civil and Revit models Slower documentation workflows (loss of reliable contours, labels, view templates, etc.) Increased risk to design accuracy and downstream construction outcomes   Idea to Implement: Removing the 50,000 point limitation on Linked Toposolids Reinstating the Revit 2023 Linked Topography (Toposurface) functionality in later Revit versions. Show More

I am going through our custom RFAs and would like to get a schedule of elements within the RFA that is only visible within the Revit Family Editor.   This will help with standardizing the build and nomenclature of the RFA elements.   Hope this is a possibility. Show More

Hello there, a few months ago Diroots solved an issue that We have been requesting and are still wating from Autodesk. I wonder why Developers or Autodesk colaborators do not give us a response for this need?   We need to Bind images as ole in dwg file when exporting from Revit.   It is not a ideal way to deliver DWG files with a lot of refernced images. If the same image is placed in many sheets, it will appear many times in the dwg file folder.     Please take our idea and consider it! Show More

Linking IFC files is a fundamental workflow when working with external models in Autodesk Revit. When an IFC file is linked from a local drive, Revit automatically generates an IFC.RVT file. This file is maintained by Revit and gets updated whenever the IFC link is refreshed. However, the workflow behaves differently in cloud projects hosted on Autodesk Construction Cloud (ACC). When an IFC is linked in a cloud project, Revit also generates an IFC.RVT, but this file becomes a regular Revit file instead of a cloud model. Because of this, the model is not included when using publishing settings for ACC in the Revit Central File. As a Sample, a Electrical Central File is published in ACC and we don't see the Architect in ACC Viewer. As a result: The linked IFC is not visible in the ACC viewer. The only workaround is to manually download the generated IFC.RVT from the IFC, upload it again as a Cloud Model, and then link it again in the cloud project. This creates unnecessary manual steps and breaks the expected workflow. Suggested Improvement When an IFC is linked in a Revit Cloud Project, the automatically generated IFC.RVT should: be created directly as a Cloud Model in Autodesk Construction Cloud be automatically updated when the IFC link is refreshed This would allow teams and stakeholders without Revit to correctly view the complete model, including IFC references, directly in ACC. Such a workflow would significantly improve collaboration and support the full use. Show More

Coordination Models could be a powerful workflow for large projects. They load faster than standard Revit links, feel more lightweight, and the model comparison feature is easy to use even for less experienced users. For multi-gigabyte models, this could be an important way to reduce Revit load and improve performance.   Right now, the visual limitations make it difficult to use Coordination Models in real projects.   What works well • Models load faster than standard Revit links • Basic model comparison works and is easy to use • Good concept for large projects • Useful that you can see which model version is currently used in the Coordination Model   Current issues • Geometry and edges are not displayed accurately • Large coordinates cause elements to jump, distort, or display incorrectly • MEP models and architectural models show graphic errors • No annotations or dimensions are possible • Display settings like shadows do not improve readability   Important note With IFC Data Exchange it is already possible to filter models in Docs and load them in a simplified form. Tagging and dimensions even work there. This shows that these capabilities are technically achievable. Coordination Models would benefit greatly from similar functionality.   Goals / Requests • Fix the display issue so elements render correctly • Ensure that annotations and dimensions work once the display issue is resolved • If a direct solution is not possible, provide a workflow similar to IFC Data Exchange, where models can be filtered before linking and annotations or dimensions remain usable   Many users would adopt Coordination Models immediately if these issues were resolved. Improving this feature would make it truly valuable for large-scale BIM projects.   Notes regarding screenshots Overview of the Revit MEP model Original Revit families in the MEP model Display issue in the Coordination Model view of the same MEP model Same issue when linking the architectural model as a Coordination Model Comparison overview The model comparison feature is a great direction for authors, but at this stage it provides mainly a graphical overview and little actionable information. Show More

I think being able to Pin something with a password so only certain individuals are able to unpin/make changes would be rather helpful Show More

Our workflow requires the up-to-date use of the "Model Coordination" module. "Model Coordination" only regenerates when a Revit model is published. Our designers have to remember to publish their model every night or the "Model Coordination" view doesn't update.     In "Design Collaboration" there is a way to schedule publishing the model but only on a weekly basis.  There should be a DAILY option that takes the requirement out of the designers hands.   Show More

We're linking in an architect's DWG to Revit 2024. The architect has "internal islands" in their CMU beyond hatch patterns (at windows) that DON'T show the pattern in AutoCAD (as desired), but they DO show up in Revit (and we can't hide them in Revit without editing the AutoCAD file). This is apparently known behavior by Autodesk:   In AutoCAD, hatch objects can include “islands” that are excluded from the hatch display. However, when a DWG is linked into Revit, Revit does not fully consider hatch island definitions. Instead, it often reads the hatch as a more simplified pattern and fills areas that were intended to be voids. Please fix (fully support DWG files). Manually copying and editing a client's file every time they change it on BIM 360 / ACC / Fusion (or whatever they're calling it now) isn't always practical. Show More

Transparency Settings for Filled Regions Currently, when using detail groups with filled regions across multiple drawings, the transparency settings applied through graphic overrides do not copy over. This creates inconsistency and increases the risk of human error. If we had the ability to assign a percentage of transparency directly to filled regions, it would: Ensure consistent visual representation across all drawings. Reduce reliance on graphic overrides. Minimize manual adjustments and errors when copying detail groups. This feature would greatly improve workflow efficiency and maintain design clarity Show More

When we open a Revit model using the standard File > Open dialog, the preview panel shows the Revit version in which the file was last saved. This is extremely helpful when working with multiple projects and different Revit releases, because we can immediately see whether the selected RVT file matches our current Revit version. However, when we use Insert > Link Revit and select an RVT file, the same preview panel does not display the file’s save version. Only the thumbnail of the model is shown. In many BIM workflows (multi-discipline teams, consultants, external links), we often need to check: Which Revit version was the link file last saved in Whether linking this file will trigger an upgrade Whether we should ask the consultant to send a model in another version Currently, to see the saved version, we have to either: Open the file directly first (which may upgrade it unintentionally), or Use external tools just to check the RVT version. --Proposed improvement Please add the “Saved in Revit Version” info to the preview panel of the Import/Link RVT dialog, similar to the standard Open dialog. For example: Under the thumbnail, show a line such as: Saved in: Revit 2023 or Saved in: Revit 2024.2 ** Benefits Faster decision-making when linking consultant models Avoid unwanted file upgrades during linking Clearer coordination in multi-version / multi-project environments Consistent UX between Open and Link Revit dialogs This is a small UI enhancement, but it would save time and prevent mistakes for many BIM coordinators and Revit users working with multiple versions every day. Thank you for considering this improvement.   Show More

Revit LT has everything I need , almost... Can't you allow rendering software plugins, like Twinmotion (and others) I'd even be willing to pay for it. Show More

Currently, the setup of the default setting for open Worksets is possible only when saving a new central file. The alternative is to use the Options while opening the file, which must be adjusted each time.     The suggested functionality will be to have the opportunity to change the default settings for open Workset for an active central file without creating a new central. This would avoid the creation of a new central file and thus maintain the version history and the link connection between the files.   Show More

With infraworks or other third party tools you can import Gis data in your Revit project.  Every building is designed somewhere so the surrounding roads/terrain are always needed. Why is that Gis import not standard in Revit? Show More

In addition to allowing us to search for the Issue directly in Revit using its number (#404 — which is not feasible in version 2023), it would be extremely useful to be able to select the related Issue and automatically generate a Section Box around the element. (Obviously, if the element belongs to a linked model, notify me, but still allow the Section Box to be created—possibly also correctly oriented.) A second feature could display, for the element in the host file, the views where it can be found, and possibly also the sheets where it appears, so that those views can be opened and worked on efficiently. I’m aware that similar commands exist, but none truly accomplish what I’m describing, which I believe would be highly beneficial in workflows where we are not the authors of the models but need to coordinate, update, or perform clash detection. Currently, I have implemented these functionalities using Dynamo and I am able to perform these tasks, so I believe there are no real limitations to making this workflow a standard feature within the plugin. I hope this can be useful. Best regards. Show More

In Manage Links, the current status for linked models only shows “In Closed Workset”, without indicating which workset the link belongs to. It would be extremely helpful if Manage Links displayed the actual Workset name that each linked model is assigned to. This improvement would: Help users—especially new or less experienced users—quickly understand where the linked model is located. Reduce confusion and troubleshooting time when a link is not visible. Allow users to open only the specific required workset, instead of turning on all worksets or guessing. Improve overall workflow clarity and project management efficiency in workshared models. Providing the Workset name alongside the current status would make link management far more intuitive and user-friendly   Show More

Hello Autodesk Team,   Linking coordination models from Autodesk Construction Cloud (ACC) into Revit 2025 and above is very slow. It appears that Revit continuously downloads the Navisworks file at a very low speed, causing long delays and reduced productivity.   This also results in very slow navigation in views (panning, zooming, and orbiting).   It does not feel like a one-time sync. Instead, the Navisworks model seems to keep downloading in the background. Show More

Please allow the revit template to hold predefined worksets. We use worksets in 100% of our projects and everytime we have to recreate them manualy (we don like the method to create project with worksets and use/copy that as it is prone for mistakes) Worksets are invaluable part of our workflow.   Show More

Implement a feature in Revit that allows users to define and apply custom naming rules for DWG exports Show More