Currently, the setup of the default setting for open Worksets is possible only when saving a new central file. The alternative is to use the Options while opening the file, which must be adjusted each time.     The suggested functionality will be to have the opportunity to change the default settings for open Workset for an active central file without creating a new central. This would avoid the creation of a new central file and thus maintain the version history and the link connection between the files.   Show More

Hi Autodesk, We need this API to help developers able to update data in models using Revit Design Automation, if not I belive it's is really hard to use Revit Design Automation on cloud. What I'm expecting : - One API input the urn model to force Relinquish of all users owner that model, not only my self.   What is current now : There are APIs available to check the checkout status of elements—for example,  WorksharingUtils.GetCheckoutStatus() . However, there are currently no APIs that allow relinquishing ownership of elements not checked out by the current Revit user. The  RelinquishOwnership()  method only works for elements that are checked out by the current user. Show More

In my daily workflow, I work with multiple Revit models. After completing my tasks in a model, I need to synchronize it with the central model and then manually close it as a separate step. This becomes time-consuming and interrupts the flow, especially when dealing with several models throughout the day. I would like to suggest a feature that allows users to synchronize and close a model in a single action. This could be implemented as an additional button or checkbox in the Synchronize with Central dialog, such as "Synchronize and Close." This small improvement would streamline workflows, save time, and reduce repetitive steps—particularly beneficial for users managing multiple models. Show More

Add the ability to filter elements based on the Revit link file that they are located in. For example, this could be used to filter out any levels or grid lines from linked models. This can currently be achieved by editing view properties for Revit links, but this needs to be done for each link, which can be time consuming for large projects and needs to be maintained as new models are added to the project, while the ability to filter would be applied universally. Show More

It would be nice if links could have a timestamp to know when the link was last updated.  Currently, when we have changes in a linked model, we don't know if revit automatically updated things or if we need to manually reload so we do a manual reload to ensure the latest is loaded. If there were a timestamp, it would help reduce these load times, especially on larger projects.  Show More

I think Revit should automatically relinquish all elements when a user closes a workshared model. A user has to synchronize periodically and when closing anyway. If a user works for long without synchronizing and then closes the file, any changes lost will be problematic for that person. When elements are reserved by someone who forgot to relinquish and then left on holiday, it stops everybody else from doing their job, potentially for several days. I am working on a big project, and we are having issues with this on a weekly, if not daily basis. Show More

If you save an updated cloud model, this is initially only saved in the local cache, if the model needs to be published to the ACC, this must be triggered manually as shown below. It would be nice to have a save button that updates and saves the model directly in the acc Show More

On behalf of a customer from German let me register the following wish. It can occur that the VG dialog/ Revit links/ Visibility settings will be edited accidentally , eg from linked view to custom and this way the set views will get lost. The request would be to be able to transfer these Revit Link Visibility settings or views between projects (in this case practically between an earlier stage of the model and the current model).   Show More

Please make it possible to have Workshared Models saved on ACC template files remain workshared when a new project is created using the template. The way ACC templates works currently is that it will just make a NON-workshared copy of the workshared files saved to the ACC template. This is completely pointless since the non-workshared copy can not even be opened in Revit. I would LOVE to use a feature like this to use on ACC projects for training that I often need to recreate for each training session. The option to quickly make a copied file workshared would also be a nice alterative. (eg a button on the ACC web interface for "initiate worksharing") At the moment the only way to make an ACC copied model workedshared is to download a copy from ACC, open it in Revit, and initiate cloud worksharing. Show More

In software development circles the concept of source control is crucial to the development of any application, but even more so far large extensive applications that could have hundreds or even thousands of developers interact with the source code over many years.   It is well established that a number of owner operators of buildings have elected to maintain "up-to-date" Revit models (or their long term design partners choose to) in order to facilitate constant changes, upgrades and renovations to their properties. A variety of creative solutions have and continue to be employed to allow the "owners" of these "source" models to keep these models up-to-date. Sometimes it is a selective copy/paste (or the equivalent using an API based tool) other times it may be a common model that "everyone" works in while making use of the Phasing features in Revit, there are likely other approaches or variations to these common themes.   With the advent of Revit Cloud Worksharing it became easier to share access to these "common" models, however for a variety of reasons, common access to a single model is problematic particularly when there are multiple active projects with different timelines and multiple design and construction partners all accessing the data.   Arguably, in these cases Revit and RCW would benefit from a source control methodology more akin to what is used in software development. Where a "building" can be downloaded and branched according to the needs of each design (development team). Each team can then execute their changes following the normal course of events used today. Eventually that particular Team would need to submit a "Pull" request to merge their design into the master source. Just like software development depending on the configuration of the environment such a pull request might automatically trigger reviews prior to being accepted, or it could go through as what amounts to a "master Sync With Central". BIM 360 today by in large has the tools available that such a workflow could be imagined to be feasible, the biggest issue to overcome would be the automated "Master Sync With Central" and the user interface and experience for review and merging the changes. Show More

The Version History only displays the username of the user who synchronized or upgraded the Revit model username. It would be greatly appreciated if you could give us the username that was given up forcefully in the version history. This is advantageous when multiple users have worked on the model and discover that they cannot synchronize it. Show More

So many times we experience a linked REVIT model gets unpinned and accidentally moved. It would be great to add an option to lock the linked REVIT model after it is pinned.   Moved models often creates a substantial amount of rework due to model content that was modelled incorrectly based on wrong information. As one example, for architecture links inside an MEP model, this could be piping modelled inside walls that needs to shift. Show More

Shared parameters in the Revit link need to be added as project parameters to be taken into consideration by filters in the host model. If the shared parameters are only inside the family in the link model and are not added as project parameters in the link, filters can't see them.  Adding a shared parameter as a project parameter assigns this parameter to all families of the selected category. Making the family shared parameters visible for filters can help with keeping a clear model if each family has a different set of parameters. Show More

Dear all,   Please add the function for Save As previous version of BIM360 Design (cloud model), instead of just only Restore At this moment if we want to save as previous model, we have to save as current model for backup, after that restore the previous version and save as this version, delete the restored model and re-upload the previous backup model. And now we lost all the previous versions, just to get a version. So the version history function has no meaning. I hope Autodesk improved this feature in an upcoming update, thinking this flaw has been there for a long time, but still you are not interested in fixing the problem. Thanks Show More

Have Workshare monitoring for cloud models, been years, and still no real solutions, just some workarounds that do not really do the job.   Show More

it would be great if we could select all of a bank of view templates or filters to delete them or copy them instead of having to select them individually and press delete and then say yes delete that and yes I'm sure just to delete all of a set of 10.  Show More

When we create a group with multipole element from different work-sets it change the work-sets of the element to the Group work-set, it will be helpful if we can create a group from different element with different work-set and the Element will keep the work-set it had before and we will have the ability to change the element work-set inside the Group.  Show More

Hello all,  The visibility of worksets per view would be much more easy to change if there were tickboxes rather than the current drop down menu per workset. Even more, if we could select several worksets at once and apply the same visibility settings to several at the same time, that would be a timesaver. Thanks   Show More

On behalf of a customer from Germany let me post the following wish: Make more flexible the work with revisions in worksharing files and this way allowing that multiple use can work on revisions at the same time. Currently only one person can works on revisions and the next one have to wait until the model is synced.   Show More