Sometimes you want to just place a spline to bridge some edge, but you don't need to select a plane to make the 3D sketch line. Show More

EDIT: Add the option to delete a forum post. Show More

When cutting inch+ plate I prefer to edge start rather than pierce. It would be great to be able to select an Edge Start option that would automatically find the nearest edge and/or pre-drilled start. It would be ideal if entry points could be defined with a corresponding torch start point.   At present I've been working around the issue by defining an entry point and lead-in distance but this requires each path to be setup separately.     Show More

The New Dynamic Tool Ribbon  How do I turn this feature off??? It is driving me nuts. First *Microsoft* did it with Word and Excel. The icon layout would change subtly, depending on things like window size, leaving users fumbling and wondering where Insert Column had gone. Now Fusion has a worse, more intrusive version of adaptive UI...    Why would anyone want this? Yes, Apple did it with their Touch Bar, but you'll notice things like Volume stay in one place, so when you go to use it next time, it's where you remember it was... and just because Apple does something doesn't mean Autodesk has to do it.   As we learn software we learn where things are, allowing us to become more adept and efficient. Now UI designers at Autodesk (thinking they are helping) have gone and taken that away. Now we get layout changes based on a prediction of what we are going to need next.. So you’re putting in perpendicular constraints one second and then find the item has changed location the next! You draw a circle and go to draw another.. and lo and behold - the circle tool has disappeared! Why? Because I don’t need it now?? How do you know I don’t need it now??   I have commented on UI that changes location before.   Imagine turning on the light in your new apartment and then going to turn it off, only to discover that the position of the switch has changed location - to make your life easier.   Imagine a wardrobe that changes the location of all your clothes based on what it thinks you will want to wear. You want to go down the street to quickly get some milk, but all it presents you with are suits and ties, because the next engagement in your calendar is a wedding! Helpful? Of course not. Show More

using text on cylinder volume for extruding is complex or a hell. can you create possibility to use a spline with text or use similar 'sweeps' with text and follow a path for exemple.   Show More

A file may have a number of different Derives and Inserts that are out of date. Currently either one must update them all or none at all. SUGGESTION: allow user to "update all" or "update selected" (a list with checkboxes appears) items. Show More

Currently out of date derives show in the Timeline (which may have scrolled off screen) and at the very top left of screen (which is rather too discreet).   SUGGESTION: have warning triangles appear in the left column against Components, Bodies Sketches (all derived items) that are out of date. (Just as is already the case for Inserted components.) Show More

It seems there is no easy way to flip a body or component so you have a mirrored version of it. I come from Sketchup and if you want to flip something you just used the scale command and entered -1 for the factor. Easy! I have asked on the forums and it seems the only way to do it is use the mirror command but if you don't want the original you are stuck with it or have to hide it or whatever. It shouldn't be this hard in software this sophisticated. How about using the scale function or adding flip checkbox to the copy/move dialog? Show More

I'm very happy that G71/G72 canned cycles have finally made it into Fusion 360 turning. Any word on G70 finishing?   I was able to added same tool G70 finishing to the Fanuc Turning post processor by simply storing the P and Q values and appending a G70 call following the path. It works but isn't ideal in that is assumes the same tool and feed rate as the G71/G72 roughing. I hard code a feed rate into the first block in the path (which G71/G72 ignores) and this will work for testing.   Can a finishing option be added when the canned cycle is selected? Ideally one would be able to select a second tool when using canned cycles along with the appropriate feeds and speeds.   I my mind canned roughing should be an option for a finishing path, not the other way around like it is now. 😉 Show More

Would it be possible to allow 'convert to sheet' to be used on a surface that has not been thickened, by selecting a side and a SM rule. Therefore doing the thicken and convert in one action? Would keep the timeline less cluttered. Show More

Please add support for the haas pre next gen controls post to us tool orientation while probing.  For those of us  who have a 5 axis haas with the older control , so wee can us probe geometry to measure parts  using 3+2. Show More

Right now I need to right click, cut, paste new... I would like to see ability to just drag children components out of parent and make them their own entity in the browsers Hierarchy Tree structure. This seems like a common feature among programs that have hierarchical relationships and I think it should be fusion... Also could add a right click feature promote to parent as another way to do it but I would prefer the drag it out of parent and make it its own... both features please.     Thanks! Jeff Show More

When creating joints or using the move (point-to-Point) command I have to go left/right with the mouse very often. It would be nice to have some shortcut like Shift+Enter to accept the current selection and advance the menu to the next required selection. This would save a few seconds at many occasions. this is already standard in other CAD Software like Nx or Solidworks   So for moving point-to-point instead of selecting all the bodies to move (in the middle of the screen) -> go with the mouse to the menu (right) -> click Origin Point-> go with the mouse to the middle of the screen -> go with the mouse to the menu (right) -> click Target Point-> Enter   it would be nice to be able to keep the mouse in the middle of the screen and select all bodies -> shift+enter -> select Origin -> shift+enter -> select Target -> enter   It is so much more convenient Show More

It would be a grate addition to start using and making form tools for the turning side of fusion like we can in milling now, so would be nice to turning getting some long lost love and improvements.   like to see it added to ID and OD turning operations, for  Rough and Finish operations. sure there are other useful areas too like grooving etc this would open up a whole new world for turning as not everything can be machined with ISO shape tooling     Show More

When zoomed in on an extrude or section analysis sometimes the drag-arrow ends up off-screen. This can be problematic if simultaneously trying to check something whilst adjusting the arrow.   SUGGESTION: have the arrow move automatically such that remains on-screen. Show More

Please give us the ability to have the same three infeed modes for thread milling that are currently present in turning.  Currently both Fusion 360 and HSMWorks only support the first mode of a constant infeed.  This will significantly improve thread mill tool life.  It would be great to have that same functionality in HSMWorks as well.   The attached pictures show a constant .012" infeed.  The first pass barely scratches the bore.  The second pass removes almost all of the material and completes the M8 x 1.25 thread.  The first pass should be taking about 75% of the total radial depth of cut, while the second pass should be taking the remaining 25%. Show More

As the view approaches a direction perpendicular to a Section Analysis so it becomes progressively impossible to make adjustments to the depth of the section by sliding the arrow provided for the purpose.   Suggestion: provide a slider in the Section Analysis Dialog Box that the user can switch to when the on-screen arrow becomes inaccessible due to the viewpoint being close to perpendicular to the section itself. Show More

Hi I use allot of necked endmills. For example a flute length of 22mm but with a neck of 36mm. So you can go 36mm deep without rubbing the endmill against the part.   You can specify the "Shoulder length" in the tool setup. But when you're in the tool library you can't sort on "shoulder length" or have a column that specifies this. So you really need to know which tools are necked. Or keep a separate Excel sheet which specifies all tools and lengths.    Show More

Maybe a checkbox somewhere: Show More

I would like to import and use extended libraries from within the Python API.   Specifically xlrd and openpyxl   xlrd would allow us to populate parameter expressions from a familiar file format and not pose a huge security risk...   Thank you Show More

User selected feature colors would be a great help for the colorblind.  7-10% of the male population suffer from this.  Construction lines are almost invisible to me, therefore almost useless.  There may be other features that I am missing that I am not even aware of.  Another option would be to differentiate feature type by using another type of indicator to show the properties of the feature.   This has been mentioned before but has not received any attention from Autodesk.   Thanks for any help.    (Without the constraint indicators I cannot see the construction lines in the attached sketch.) Show More

We would like to see aggregate tooling options in the manufacture workspace.   Basic options for aggregates that would handle the translations without modifying the post. 1) Fixed 90degree aggregates 2) Dual-Fixed 90degree aggregates 3) Adjustable Angle Aggregates   Perhaps an aggregate section in the tool holders database could provide translation data to the dump file   Thank you for considering. Show More

We would like very much to be able to  create a body from remaining stock! Show More

I'm working in a design of a pallet and I'm having a difficult time aligning the stock of material to the stops in the pallet. What do you guys think about having an alignment option in the Setup. Thanks     Show More

Hi! I suggest that you can change the dimension lines to another color, and another linetype. I also like the idea to place balloons in the middle of components without a arrow. and maybe a BOM list with dimensions. Show More

I suggest that the Combine feature allow for the selection of Components as Tool Bodies.     I have numerous situations where my objective is the Combining of ALL the Bodies within a particular Component. Now, the Target clearly has to be a single Body. But in order to specify ALL of the Bodies within the Component that I'm dealing with as being Tool Bodies I need to either individually select each and every Body via the Browser OR I can make sure that only the selected Component is visible on the screen and use a Bounding Selection Rectangle to implicitly select all of the Bodies. That certainly works and I will  indeed get the combined Body that I desire. BUT, later on, some days or weeks later I, or someone else, makes a change to that Component. The change might result in some of those prior Bodies no longer existing or it might result in new Bodies being created as part of the Component, or both of those kinds of changes.  The problem then becomes that the Combine operation will NOT in fact do a combine of all the CURRENT Bodies in that Component. In the case of JUST new Bodies being created the combined Body will be missing those newly created Bodies, but NO WARNING will be generated for the Combine feature. In the case of one or more of the previously existing Bodies now (after the Component edit) no longer existing, the Combined Body MIGHT rely on cache to create those missing bodies, making it LOOK like it's all OK, but a WARNING will be created for the Combine feature in the timeline. In EITHER CASE the combined Body will NOT be what was intended, namely the combination of ALL of the Bodies of the Component. And the reason why that is true is because the Combine Feature remembers only the list of Bodies that were chosen. ALLOW BOTH BODIES AND COMPONENTS to be chosen If, on the other hand, the Combine Dialog allowed for the selection of not just specified Bodies but ALSO the selection of Components, this problem would disappear. The Combine Feature would remember the set of specifically selected Bodies (either via the Browser or via a Bounding Selection Rectangle) AND the set of selected Components. It would NOT remember the list of Bodies IMPLICITLY selected via the selected Components. Rather, each time that the Combine Feature is processed it would look at each selected Component and gather up the entire set of Bodies for that Component (and likewise for all its sub-components). The combined Body would always be what is desired regardless of any changes that might have been made to the related Components By taking that approach, of allowing BOTH Bodies AND Components to be selected as Tools, the Combine Feature would work no matter what changes may have been made to the associated Components. Show More

When you close a design it saves the current image that was on the screen at the time of closing. What it does NOT save is the status of what you were doing, where you were in your work flow, what the timeline looked like, where the history marker was in the timeline, what the active component was.   All of that would be incredibly helpful. I often get to a point in my work where it's time to call it a day and I fully intend to pick up right where I left off, but when I close the design and then come back to Fusion the next day, re-opening that same design, it's not where I left off. I have to basically recreate the status of where I left off, clicking through the browser to get to the correct component, activating the component, scrolling around the timeline to get where I was ... etc. If you could make it so that saving a design also saved the current work status, and opening a design would restore it to that status, that would be great. Show More

Granted, there are numerous ways one can make a tube.  But, from a creative workflow perspective, it's a bottleneck.  The tube is surely one of the most common primitives every designer needs at their fingertips, which shouldn't be any kind of burden to produce.  At the very least, you might consider adding a Thru Hole option to the Cylinder primitive dialogue.   Show More

When you're doing a Combine Join operation and you do NOT select to create a New Component from the combined bodies it makes sense to provide a Keep Tools option. The Target Body will itself get combined with the Tool Bodies, so that Target Body will of course get kept. The only question is whether or not you also want those Tool Bodies to be kept as is. So, "Keep Tools" is a sensible label for the keeping option. But when you're doing a Combine Join operation and you do indeed select to create a New Component from the combined bodies  the "Keep" option not only applies to the Tool Bodies but ALSO to the TARGET Body. So, my suggestion, for the purposes of complete clarity as to what will indeed happen: When the user selects the New Component option, the label for the Keep option should CHANGE from simply "Keep Tools" to "Keep Target & Tools".   As it stands it not exactly clear what will happen to the Target Body. If you just "Keep Tools" will the Target Body disappear or will it also be kept as is? Show More

Is there a way to create a chamfer on a modeled thread that would blend/match the lead in and out of the thread instead of staying a complete chamfer? (see picture) Show More

The combine tool lets you select a target body and then multiple tool bodies: I've recently done some CUT type combines, expecting that the result would be a single body but it actually generated a number of bodies. One of the bodies represented what I was expecting. The remaining bodies barely seemed to even exist. I had to use Show In Window and then zoom, zoom, zoom IN in order to even see them. Each one consisted of just incredibly tiny bits of material. Obviously there were itty-bitty gaps between some of the bodies that I had selected as the cutting tools, or maybe some of the tool bodies themselves had portions of their bodies that were extremely close to other portions of their bodies. And the result was these incredibly small "crumbs", each one being a separate (in my mind, extraneous) Body object. So, I'm thinking it might be helpful to include some kind of "Accuracy" or "Resolution" (or some better word) on the Combine dialog that lets the user specify a minimum size for Bodies created by the Combine CUT operation. If there were some default like, say, "Not smaller then 0.001 millimeter" then those extraneous, way-too-small to be significant, Bodies just wouldn't have been created. As it was, I went back and adjusted some things in my design so that those tiny crumb-sized Bodies won't get generated when I do the Combine/CUT. Show More

Is it possible to get the Desktop Connector for Fusion Team cloud storage running in Mac?   it’s really a must to be able to open and save ocrent in the team storage directly from apps without saving somewhere locally and uploading next through the web browser.   Thanks Show More

After a F360 software update is installed and F360 relaunches typically it appears as a new icon in the dock. The "old" icon being the alias that one has saved in dock to the F360 app instance in the Applications folder. It's already annoying to have 2 icons simultaneously and then at some point one will inevitably click on the "old" icon which will the attempt to launch the new software update which is already running. Further confusion and things go from bad to worse.     This problem has existed since as long as I can remember and it would be great to address it so that we don't have to quit the F360 instance that launches after installation-restart in order to launch it cleanly from the "old" icon permanently in the dock.     Show More

Hey Guys, I was really disappointed to see that Live Review didn't make it after the preview version ... When I was working for a reseller back in India , Live Review was a very good convincing and a selling point to make the customers understand the necessity of a cloud platform - such a strong feature proving collaboration .. Please support this idea to bring back this feature ...  Show More

In the online Help platform website code or template, in the page title, swap the order of the site + page topic elements in the page title, so the page-specific topic appears first. This would allow the web browser tabs to become useful for selecting the desired page, when more than one such Help page is open. Since it's often that case that users would have multiple Fusion help tabs open, this would increase usability for virtually all users on a frequent basis. It's extremely easy to do this right: The attached image shows an example, with two tabs each from Fusion 360 Help, Python docs, and Microsoft. The latter tabs show the topics and are useful for selecting the desired page. The current Fusion tabs are useless for this purpose. Show More

I love Fusion360, I am a die hard fan of it... and I recommend it to all of the Machine Shop owners, Engineers, MakerSpaces, and CNC people I meet. I use and recommend this program so much I should probably have a job for you guys finding all the problems / adding features. But there are some things that it lacks that are so basic / ridiculous I can not believe it... I search around for plugins / workarounds but it should be stuff that is just inside Fusion360 that shouldn't need all that   1. Unite Lines - Why on earth do we not have a unite lines feature???? It is a necessity. I highly encourage your development team to put everything else on the road map on the back burner and add this feature ASAP...   I should be able to click lines... and then hit Unite Lines with a tolerance option... so it closes loops / gaps   Please don't recommend me some workaround or plugin... I don't want that... this needs to be a built in feature in Fusion360.   It is such a basic tool / function...   Show More

It will be very convenient to have the bounding box dimension that we are in the proprieties of a component  to be seen in the table when we create a drawing, probably the more useful feature in the table. Show More

Please fix a maximun size of the tag with the name of the file, and only reduce the size when many tags. What annoys me is, every time I need to close a few tags I need to move the mouse looking for the "x" icon to close the next tag.  Suggestion: use the same system as current Chrome tags browser, for example.   Thank you. Show More

Currently, activating a component requires: (a) Visually identifying which items in the browser are actual components and thus possible targets. This requires visually searching left (irregularly indented) side of the tree. (b) Hovering the mouse over the component name until the radio button appears. (c) Moving the mouse the the right side of the item, over the radio button. (d) Clicking on the radio button   This operation requires far more visual effort and fine motor operations than necessary.   My preference would be not to hide the non-selected radio buttons. This would visually identify components (more positively than the indistinct and multiple different "component" and "assembly" icons), and give the eye and hand an available visual target to move the mouse towards (instead of requiring hover then jog-to-the-right).   However, I realize that the visual designers may have an insurmountable fetish for suppressing anything perceived by a lay person as visual clutter -- such as the disappearing unselected radio buttons.   So, as a fallback, at least expand the hit region for browser tree items that are components so that it encompasses the area where the radio button will appear.  This way, users can move the mouse directly to that location, prompting the button to appear, and then click on it.   This is an ergonomic issue as well as a speed and productivity issue, as it reduces two mouse movements requiring fine positioning each time down to a single move and fine position. Show More

Add function "Save Linked copy as" to save a component with "Design history" and synchronization with root design. This is necessary to make a new design and then add a component from another design (within the same project) to that new design as a linked component. Lack of this feature breaks Top-down design. Forum thread. Show More

A direct export a Fusion 360 assembly with linked components as an F3Z archive onto the local drive is already possible. It is still not possible to export a 2D Drawing this way.   Show More

Why oh why oh why after all this time can I not simply double click on a feature (on the screen not the timeline) and have its dimensions pop up on the screen for me to select to modify?  Seriously guy?  This is basic 101 CAD modification!  You guys are driving me crazy.  I thought after taking a year break from this software and coming back to it you'd have something so basic figure out.  Please allow one to simply double click on a feature and have its dimension pop up on the screen allowing to double click on the dimension and change it value. Show More

Would be nice to chose in the patch command window if I directly want my patch to be stitched to neighboring surfaces. Makes work faster and keeps timeline shorter. Should remember last choice (stitch or not stitch). Show More

When you do a Compute All you can get a small red Icon in the lower right corner of the window that indicates that the design contains some warnings and/or errors. Hovering over that icon pops up a brief overview of the problems, including a count total for warnings and errors. CLICKING on the icon brings up a comprehensive LIST of all the problems.   Double-clicking on any of the items in the list causes the Timeline to adjust itself so that the related item in the timeline is visible and highlighted. That is VERY helpful in getting right to the item that needs addressing. HOWEVER, in order to actually DEAL with the issue, like editing a sketch or fixing a Revolve, you have to CLOSE that dialog. And that means that, even though you might fix the first problem you double-clicked on in the list, the list is no longer accessible for clicking on, and thereby getting directly TO, the next problem you want to address. You CAN, while the list dialog is visible, click the COPY icon on the dialog and grab a copy of the text of the list in the dialog. And of course you could then bring up something like Notepad and PASTE that text into it, so that you can see the list. But that text, of course, does not provide "click-to-get-to" functionality like the dialog itself does. In fact, that list doesn't even contain enough information (like which Component the error or warning is in) for you to know where in the design it actually resides. SO, could it be possible to make that Error dialog REMAIN UP (until you explicitly close it) while you address the problems it lists, like editing referenced sketches and other features in the timeline? Doing so would make it so much easier to actually get to the related items in the timeline. Or perhaps provide some means up BRINGING IT BACK UP after you've dealt with the current item in the list? As it stands now, you have to do a complete new Compute All in order to bring it back up. For large projects that can take an inordinate amount of time. Show More

I had posted a question in one of the Fusion 360 forums asking what the red lock image on some of my Sketch icons meant.   Several people very kindly responded and pointed out that the addition of the small red lock image on a sketch icon meant that the related sketch is "fully constrained".  Several people also pointed out that using RED for that image wasn't really in conformance with general uses of the color, which is usually intended to indicate a BAD situation, when in fact a sketch being fully constrained is a very DESIRABLE situation. Also, using an image of a lock generally implies that the object is somehow locked. The normal (non-fully-constrained) image for a sketch has a little pencil in the lower right corner. That makes sense since it, along with the dots and lines on the image, reasonably indicate a sketching operation. REPLACING the pencil with a lock image would seem to imply that the sketch is DONE and cannot be subsequently edited. But that's not the case. The sketch can STILL be edited. It SHOULD still be editable, even though the current status of the sketch might now be fully constrained. SO, A SUGGESTION: Always keep the pencil in the lower right corner, so that it is very clear that it is a sketch object. When the sketch is NOT fully constrained, put a small YELLOW square in the UPPER RIGHT corner of the sketch icon, to let the user know that it is not yet fully constrained.  Yellow is used throughout Fusion 360 to indicate a warning, and this use of yellow for the sketch icon would conform to that standard. When the sketch IS fully constrained, replace that yellow square with a GREEN CHECKMARK. The color and the checkmark will both indicate that the sketch is "OK", that it is now fully constrained, and there will be no implication that it is somehow locked from further editing.   Show More

If the model is complex placing a Base feature in a drawing can be slow, involve lots of spinning disks and may even crash. Typically the first step after that is to "Suppress all except selected" components. At which point the drawing becomes quite responsive!   SUGGESTION: speed up by simplifying the placing of a complex Base feature. Perhaps by showing only an approximate outline until the likely and necessary component selection has been made. Show More

Hi As Fusion has already a very capable analytical capability - would it not be logical to add a CFD capability.  I am sure there are people who may prefer to use Fusion but may have to use alternative packages because of no CFD.   Even if it is an expensive addition could it not be covered by cloud credits like shape optimization is?   Thanks   Richard Show More

Its very annoing to make a chamfer to a 3d modeled thread hole or shaft. Please include a tool that simplifys that.   Right now I only can draw a triangle and revolve this as cut away to the thread, but this takes a lot of time compared to the champfer tool. If I use the chamfer tool it has no valid edge to use it on the thread.   Show More

When select an opacity from standard list (10%, 20%....) then next time one consults same menu for same part that opacity should show with a Tick next to it.   Relatedly, if a custom opacity has been previously selected then there should be a Tick (or some other visual change) next to the "Custom..." option in the dropdown.       As per this thread:   https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-360-support/selected-opacity-does-not-remain-checked-in-dropdown-menu/td-p/9124152 Show More

Hi   I know I am not the first to have this idea, but I find some posts dating back to 2015 and still seemingly nothing has happened: Even if all All Work Features visibility is turned off, I want to immediately see my sketch when chosing to edit it. This is a basic function in Solidworks and Creo for instance and just simply a necessity. Nobody can edit an invisible sketch. Turning visibility on and off all the time manually is time consuming, painful and not up to date. Please add Thanks Mani   Show More

Are there any plans to integrate the API so that we can string together simulations and pull out key values? Show More

Hey guys,   The Project commands (5 in total) are a very essential and basic set of tools in our daily design process. Even thou some Project commands are used more often than others, I think they all should be under a Single dialog box and inside the dialog box, the first option would be to choose the Type of Project command is needed. We save space in the Sketch menu. Easier to reach and click one command and eliminating another sub-menu. One shortkey ("P") to open the main dialog box and separate shortkeys for each Project command, which will open the main Project dialog box with the Project command type radio button selected.   I hope it makes sense. Please let me know what you think.   Cheers / Ben --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Did you find this reply helpful? If so please use the Accept as Solution or Kudos button below. Need a new computer? Fusion 360 Hardware Benchmark: TESREG.com Check out my YouTube channel: Fusion 360: NewbiesPlus Show More

Hello,   I was wondering how it could be possible to save the 3D rendered mesh display by Fusion360. In Fusion, when applying a Decal on a 3D solid the UV's are amazingly well generated and the image displayed continuisly from face to face. But when exported as FBX you get a regalar basic UV's completely unusable....   Find in attachment, a screenshot with the 2D image applied on a surface as it could be for a packaging. the image smoothly applied on the top follow on the front and the sides...   But the Fusion360 file exported in FBX and imported in AdobeDimension as completely lost it's UV's and you see taht the image placed as texture is placed completely randomly. (or at least using the respective Uv of each patch of the box)... but not the UV's of the interactive displayed mesh. You may see that it's corect too in the 3D view of the WebBrowser.... Show More

Could it be possible to extend the list of file suported by anycad?   It's great to be able to open without converting a step, or Creo file, but it could be cool to do the same with 3DM(rhino) files.   It could also be mandatory to to this with .wire (Alias)files. It's a pity that it's not piossible within all the Autodesk 3D apps. Even if it don't make a lot of sense for 3DS or MAya, As Alias is one of the best for Styling and Design it should really be valuable to link the Styling and the Mechanical part of a project in a single file keeping references live.   Many Thanks Show More

Hi I use parting tools with the offset probed on the job side of the tip. When programed the parting z value is the actual job length instead of a value inclusive of the tip. This is also useful when changing the part tool width so the program doesn't need re-posting. I can fudge the back offset in the geometry tab inside the parting window but the simulation cuts the part.   Show More

The Data Panel shows all the projects that you're working on and you can Pin Projects so that they appear at the top of that list. It's not at all clear to me WHERE a newly pinned Project gets put in that list. The most recent Pin I did (of a newly created folder named Friendship 7 Mercury Capsule) ended up somewhere in the middle of the list. It would be really nice if there was a way to drag-and-drop items in the list in order to re-order them, such as putting the most important ones near the top, even if they may not be the ones you work on the most or most recently.     Show More

It would be nice to have the option when selecting diminsions when setting up tool holder geometries to be able to indicate height based on a reference line rather than the last feature. In other holds, I place my tool holder in a test stand and check heights with a height gauge. These are absolute coordinates and it would be nice to have this option in the software. Thanks for the consideration Show More

cutting tools for tut metric do not have any decent cutting tools for engraving. engraving side of fusion 360 seems to be lacking in substance. Show More

Hi Guys, Can we have a notes filed added to the tool library? It would be useful for conveying information Show More

Currently, the "Used in" tab only displays the models the current version of the design is referenced in. To track which design version has been used elsewhere, one needs to browse through the versions one by one. The lack of overview of "Used In" for all the versions may also cause confusion when attempting - and failing - to remove a design that is seemingly not referenced anywhere (but its previous version is). Show More

Sometimes there is too much on the page of a drawing. Perhaps too much in a base view or too many base views.   It would be great to be able to select items in a Drawing and Paste them onto a new Sheet. Obviously this would not just move the objects with their associated dimensions and so forth but the appropriate component and body selections. Show More

Can we get a midplane between two parallel axis? (there is only one plane between two parallel axis) Show More

I've got a HUGE design. It's got errors and warnings. I really do want to address them all, get them all corrected so that eventually I have a really beautiful clean design. Fusion 360 knows where they all are and, sure, I can scroll, scroll, scroll through the timeline to find them. BUT, how cool would it be if some indication would show up in the BROWSER indicating which components have errors and/or warnings, so that I could quickly zero in on the problem components, activate each one in turn, scroll through it and get quickly to the bad spots? Maybe a simple red and/or yellow bar in the Browser. Something like this...   Show More

When applying a dimension in a sketch it may already be specified and thence become a "driven dimension".   However at a later moment that dimension may cease to be specified or constrained by other elements. At that point it would be GREAT if it would be possible to edit the "no longer driven dimension" and assign it a value in the normal way. Show More

When one is parting off, almost every single time, you have to slow down rpm unless you want your part to fly and damage itself, lathe or worse...we have to manually adjust the g-code; then you go and adjust program in fusion and forget to manually adjust g-code  again, and BOOM! Bigger the  parts, bigger the problems and risks.   Just adding an option (when programming part off) to set max rpm when certain diameter is reached, and lathe guys would be jumping in joy.   Simple update, but very important. This should ld be implemented from the beginning....     Show More

When dimensioning or making notes on a drawing it would be very helpful to change from the default arrow to other styles.  The "tick" in the figure attached is my favorite personally.   Show More

When prototyping one might set two items to be 5mm apart, then later try 2mm and then later want to try them co-linear. These modifications might be made by adjusting a linear dimension in a sketch. Currently the co-linearity case requires either that one deletes the dimension and uses the colinear constraint.... OR that one sets the dimension to a small number such as "0.001mm". I do the latter. It would be nice to be able to set the dimension to ZERO. Not least because if one decides to increase it again to do so from a colinear constraint required a) delete the constraint; b) manually drag apart the items; c) add the linear dimension; Show More

Current drawing dxf and svg exports create 3D files with positions in the z direction. It would be great to have an option to export the drawing as a 2D file with everything flattened into the z0 plane since there is no other way to do this if you want annotations and sections shown alongside projected geometry.   It would be great for producing files to send to vendors who need a 2D file for their CAM workflow, and would save me having to open the exported file in another CAD package to flatten the dxf before sending it on!   See here for a screencast of the issue: https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-360-design-validate/export-drawing-as-flattened-dxf/m-p/9123588#M200647   Thanks,   Ed Show More