It would be highly beneficial to introduce a configurable notification system that alerts Project Admins and Hub Admins as a project approaches the maximum limit of 20,000 active reviews. Currently, there is no warning mechanism in place, which can result in workflows being unexpectedly disrupted once the limit is reached. A proactive alert (for example at 70%, 85%, and 95% capacity) would allow administrators to take preventative action (such as archiving, cleaning up reviews, or adjusting processes) before hitting the cap. This enhancement would improve project continuity, reduce downtime, and support better planning and management of large or review-intensive projects. Optional Enhancements: Customizable threshold percentages for notifications In-app alerts as well as email notifications Dashboard indicator showing current review usage vs. limit Show More

Popups or Notification Dots should be added to Desktop Connector when a user has actions assigned to them such as Reviews or Issues. Email notifications seems outdated, as almost every other app has these as standard. Show More

Popup (push) notifications in the Autodesk Forma mobile app would significantly improve real‑time awareness and usability for users on the move. Currently, important updates can be missed unless the app is actively checked. Introducing timely popup notifications would ensure critical information reaches users instantly. Why this would be beneficial ✅ Instant awareness of key updates such as collaboration changes, comments, or project status updates ✅ Improved productivity by reducing the need to repeatedly open the app ✅ Better field usability for users working on-site or away from desktops ✅ Faster response times to reviews, approvals, or team communications Suggested notification types Project updates or status changes New comments or mentions Collaboration invites or permissions updates System alerts or sync issues Expected Outcome Popup notifications would make Forma Mobile more proactive, responsive, and aligned with modern mobile app standards, enhancing overall user experience and collaboration efficiency. Show More

Description Ability to have a notification audit trail for RFIs and Submittals. When you have subcontractors claiming they never received a submittal or RFI and no evidence it was sent to them, this can lead to problems. The activity log on the submittals, for example, shows that we distributed it and that it's in the sub's court, but does not specifically show that an email was generated to him AND received.   Business Case This can potentially be a big problem if we have no way to hold subs accountable in a timely manner to RFIs and submittals. We essentially need to do double-work by distributing via ACC and sending out follow up emails.   This would be a better way to hold people accountable. Show More

It would be really helpful if email templates supported document variables in the “Select e-signature signers” message. Right now, every time we send documents for signature (like cost payment applications or other recurring documents), we have to manually type or copy and paste key information such as project name, pay app number, or billing period. This takes time and increases the risk of small errors. If document variables were supported in that message, the system could automatically populate those details, making the process faster, more consistent, and more efficient. This would be especially valuable for teams that send a high volume of documents on a regular basis.   Thank you!! Show More

We need better email notification settings for Submittals, RFI's and Issues. At a minimum there should be the option to send an instant email on assignment, (we have this already) then a frequency email, (admin / user defined) e.g. weekly, followed by X days (admin / user defined) before due date.  Almost anything would be better than the current options. We thought the daily digest may help, but turns out you only get a daily email when there is a new assignment. There is no daily notification for already assigned or upcoming items due. (although this would really be overkill) I understand the user homepage dashboard can be used but reality is we cannot expect all folks to be in there every day. Some are reliant on email reminders.  Show More

The current Autodesk Construction Cloud notification engine is limited to event-based triggers (status changes, assignments, responses). It does not support time-based notifications for overdue or late items, nor does it provide a way to aggregate multiple related notifications into a single, actionable message.   As a result, users are not alerted when deliverables are missed, and when notifications do occur, they are often fragmented across multiple emails for related items.   Business Impact Late or overdue actions are easily missed without manual monitoring Excessive notification volume leads to alert fatigue Users receive multiple emails for related open items instead of a consolidated summary Weakens accountability and follow-up across RFIs, submittals, issues, and tasks Undermines ACC’s role as a proactive controls and execution platform Requested Enhancement Enhance the notification engine to support time-based logic and notification aggregation. This includes: Notifications when items become overdue Optional reminders prior to due dates Aggregated notifications that summarize multiple open or overdue items in a single email (e.g., “3 RFIs and 2 submittals overdue”) Configurable frequency and thresholds (daily, weekly, X days overdue) Applicability across RFIs, submittals, issues, and other assigned records Desired Outcome Users receive concise, actionable notifications that highlight execution gaps without creating noise—enabling timely follow-up, improved accountability, and reduced reliance on manual tracking. Show More

I have made a custom drop down field for an area of folders share with internal and external stakeholders. I have to set the status of an complete folder or folder structure to prevent unnecessary clicking into the folder or folderstructure. The status shows the grade / progress of internal and furthermore external processing of the information contained in a set of files. Unfortunately the status field works only for files but not for folders. An external used MS sharepoint gives the option to flg the status of an folder by a agreed scheme of colors indicating several steps in the work flow. What can be done to allow tho implement a feature which shows or allows to set a custom status for folders? Show More

Hello, I would like to share a suggestion regarding notification capabilities within Autodesk Construction Cloud (ACC), based on user feedback and day-to-day usage. Currently, email notifications are quite generic in both structure and content. While they effectively inform users of events, they offer limited flexibility in terms of customization. In many real-world workflows—especially in larger projects or multi-stakeholder environments—there is a growing need for more tailored communication. I would like to propose the introduction of customizable notification features, such as: The ability to personalize email content (e.g., project-specific messaging, contextual information, branding elements) Configurable notification templates depending on event types (issues, RFIs, model updates, etc.) User or admin-level control over notification formatting and level of detail Optional inclusion of key metadata to improve clarity and decision-making directly from the email Such enhancements would significantly improve user experience, reduce friction in communication, and better support coordination across disciplines and stakeholders. It would also reinforce ACC as a central and adaptable collaboration platform. From a field perspective, this kind of flexibility is increasingly expected and can make a real difference in adoption and efficiency. I would be happy to discuss this further or provide additional use cases if helpful. Best regards, Olivier Show More

Hello, A lot of customers use MS Teams (more and more) to manage some project. It will be great to better integrate ACC to MS Steams. For instance, instead of sending emails when something changes or issues arise, prefer sending messages via Microsoft Teams. The benefit is faster visibility, better collaboration, and reduced inbox clutter. Voila Olivier Show More

It would be helpful if the UI will give an exclamation mark or notification when a document already is in Review or already was part of a review. At the moment it is visible in the metadata of a document, but more UI information would be helpftul (also maybe a notification button in the right top interface overall).  Show More

When I receive an email notification that an RFI has been responded to, it would be incredibly helpful if that automated email notification included the reviewer's response in the email.  Show More

Within the Project Template in our account, we want to apply people to the project template so they get added to each project that is created. By doing that, we are also adding them to the Opt Out notification group list so they don't get bombarded with emails for each project. What we found is when you go to add those individuals to the notification group, the drop down list is pulling from the ACCOUNT member list rather than the project member list. By pulling from the account, as the list grows the wait time/search for the individuals becomes harder. This feels to me like selling tickets to a concert and then emailing everyone (the account) the backstage instructions. If someone doesn’t have a backstage pass (project template access), they shouldn’t be getting directions to the green room. Show More

Build out a page to "watch" or "follow" requests from start to finish so we know when that request goes live.  Would also be nice to add my own comments, such as ID number,  to match it up with some list I might be managing for a large company. There is no "follow through" with this platform. My requests or requests I up-vote cannot easily be recalled/viewed to check the status; they just go into the abyss.   My request/Request I choose to follow -> I become a watcher -> See it get however many votes -> Product accepts it (or doesn't) -> ADSK communicates where it is on the journey to becoming "live"   Start to finish; cradle to grave. Show More

We would like to be able to customize the layout from emails received from ACC Show More

We would like the project invite email notification to be manageable through Project Notification Settings.   Our company supports multiple portfolio clients with many smaller projects. We have internal operations support team members who need to be added to every project by default. However, whenever a new project is created from a template, or when users are added manually, those team members receive an invite email notification.   Because we often open 10–20 new projects per week, this creates excessive notifications and adds unnecessary noise for internal teams, customers, and suppliers.   Current Behavior When users are added from a template, or the project members screen, the system automatically sends an invite email notification. There are currently ways to add members without an invite through certain project tool menus (example: Contracts), but this functionality is not available through the Project Members screen, which is the primary member management area.   Business Impact High-volume project creation and member assignment generates repeated invite emails that: overwhelm internal teams who are added to every project cause customers to receive more notifications than necessary create confusion or frustration for suppliers receiving repeated invites increase the chance that important emails are missed due to “notification fatigue” Use Case Scenarios Operations team members added to every project Our Safety, Insurance, Finance, and Labor Compliance users need visibility on all projects for setup, administration, troubleshooting, reporting, and ongoing coordination and cannot be left waiting for access. No opt outs available There is no current opt out for our teams or our clients to manage the email notifiers they are receiving and can create perceived annoyance and ongoing frustrations while trying to maintain portfolio visibility. Bulk onboarding or transitions During onboarding or team member transitions, we may add a user to many projects they are newly joining. The invite emails create clutter and distract from real action-required notifications, and depending on the team members role could result in hundreds of notifications in the case of a new operations support team member.  Adding members for recordkeeping rather than collaboration Sometimes external users are added to projects to support internal documentation, centralizing project contacts, optional project document access, or reporting purposes, not because they need to actively log in or participate. Sending an invite in these cases provides no value and contributes to unnecessary communication and confusion.   Show More

Hi ACC,   Context: I have brought this up to "Contact Support" page last year and the response I got was "this is working as intended".   Current Issue Project administrators currently receive email notifications with an "Your action is required" heading whenever a form is submitted for review. This is misleading because: In many cases, no action is actually required from the project admin The review responsibility belongs specifically to users/roles/companies designated in the "Review" step of the form template   Proposed Solution I recommend implementing one of the following improvements: Targeted notifications only: Send "Action Required" emails exclusively to those designated in the Review step configuration Differentiated notifications: If project admins must be notified, create a separate "For Your Information" email template that clearly indicates no action is needed This change would significantly improve user experience by reducing confusion and preventing unnecessary actions by project administrators who may believe they need to respond when they don't. Show More

Hi team, As our Build usage continues to grow, our team is communicating more efficiently within the platform. However, we’re running into challenges with how notifications are delivered. When someone assigns a task or tags you in a comment, the only alert comes through email, which often gets lost in the noise—or worse, we only find out through someone asking in person, “Did you see it?” To improve responsiveness and reduce missed communication, we’d like to request in‑app, Meta‑style notifications that clearly alert users when they’ve been tagged, assigned, or mentioned. This could include: Notification badges within the app Push notifications, such as banners or alerts outside the app A centralized notification panel showing all mentions, comments, and assignments These enhancements would make it much easier for teams to stay updated and prevent important communications from slipping through the cracks. Thanks for considering this—happy to provide more context if needed. Show More

Users are overwhelmed by the volume of email notifications generated by the system, and managing notification settings requires detailed configuration by user group. There is no centralized in-platform notification center within ADSK Build to view all alerts (comments, assignments, status changes, etc.), so teams must rely primarily on email. Creating a notification center within the platform would reduce inbox clutter, improve visibility, and streamline communication management. Show More