Description When using Save as Template from an existing project, it would be very useful to choose exactly what should be included in the new Project Template. For example: ☑ Folder structure ☑ Folder permissions ☑ Attributes ☑ Naming standards ☑ Files ☑ Issue configuration ☑ Review workflows ☑ Other supported settings This would make Save as Template much more flexible and useful, especially when recreating or migrating Project Templates between different hubs or data regions, for example US to EU. For Files, there should be a separate Include files on/off option. In many cases you want to include standard documents, checklists, CAD/BIM standards and other startup files, but you may not want to copy 40 GB of project data into a template. The user should therefore be able to choose between: ☑ Include folder structure ☐ Include files . . . This would make Save as Template a much more complete and efficient tool for creating and maintaining company Project Templates.   \\Pierre Show More

When doing markups, it automatically keeps them in Private. Add a way to publish all markups at once, not just individual ones.  Show More

We need a better way to manage project correspondence. Newforma already supports automated email filing. Ideally, Outlook emails sent or received for a project would automatically file to that project’s correspondence in Autodesk Construction Cloud, either through a native Autodesk solution or a custom hook if an open search is available. Show More

In Autodesk Forma, I really like the ability to create assets by drawing polygons or polylines directly on the drawings. This is a very powerful feature, especially for tracking field progress. One enhancement that would make this even more useful would be the ability to associate multiple polygons or polylines with a single asset. Currently, it appears to be limited to one polygon or polyline per asset. For example, I use assets to track ductwork releases on a project. When our foremen review the drawings, they can quickly see the status of each ductwork release, whether it has not started, is being processed in the shop, has shipped to the site, is currently being installed, or has been completed. I use this same asset-tracking approach for equipment as well, and it has been extremely valuable. However, ductwork releases do not always fit into one continuous polygon area. A single ductwork release may cover multiple separated areas on a drawing. Being able to assign multiple polygons or polylines to one asset would allow the asset to more accurately represent the actual scope of that release while still maintaining one status, one record, and one source of tracking. This would make asset tracking much more practical for trade contractors and field teams using Autodesk Forma to manage installation progress. Show More

Many organizations manage multiple cost contracts, each requiring different approval routes. Adding Cost Contract Name as a workflow condition would enable more flexible approval configurations and ensure payment applications are routed to the correct approvers based on the associated cost contract. Show More

It would be great if we had an add-in for Outlook where we could file emails directly from email to our projects on ACC. Sending an email to a ACC generated 'too many characters' email is not efficient. This will push Autodesk ahead of Newforma auto filing and maybe more users will decided to switch. It will benefit the users to have a filing system as robust as Newforma and bring more money to Autodesk by adding new license holders and teams. Many architecture firms will not make the move without it.  Show More

Why Autodesk allows us to add user to only a single project at a time? We are managing hundreds of project and when create a new member we need to keep on adding member project by project. If they are member on lets say 20 projects this mean to do this 20x   If you can add multiple members to a single project why we can not add a single member to multiple projects? Show More

Currently ACC is only recording date for closing issue, however, regular members cannot close issue, just complete. Would be useful to capture that date as well and show when exporting excel report. Show More

Its good to enhance the compare tool with few additional options.  1. Enable scale option while bring the comparing documents or drawings 2. Rotatable 3. Export as combined view as PDF.  Show More

Allow deleting the old outgoing and incoming Bridge automations items in the tracking logs. When new Bridge automations are created, it would be great to be able to delete the old ones that are not used to clean up the tracking log. Currently that is not possible for the incoming and outgoing items.  Show More

In our projects we have a lot of Customised Attributes in DOCS ( Documents folder ) with long list of Values. We need to be able to select multiple options under one column in some cases, but this is not an option in Autodesk. Is this something which could be added, enabled ? If we can have a multiple selection under one column in SEARCH why Autodesk does not have the same in Attributes drop-down?  Screenshots attached Show More

We would benefit from customised body of Transmittal to meet out business requirement. Our company`s Document Management Standard says "the reason for the issue shall be provided on each Transmittal" using the following  - for consent / approval / acceptance - for review / comments - for information - for tender - for construction / implementation - as built - other The recipient of Transmittal shall check that received documents from outside parties adhere to basic requirements of controlled documents and if that fail criteria Transmittal should be "rejected". There is not an option to  - accept / reject Transmittal from outside parties As a minimum each Transmittal shall contain following - transmittal number - date of issue - name of recipient - reason for issue - for each document listed on Transmittal we should have at least ( document number, revision, document title )    What is missing in Autodesk Transmittal but its required by us: - the reason for the issue - option to accept / reject Transmittal - revision / title ( we don't use Description on our documents as we have customised attribute called Title )   Show More

In our instance of ACC, we have a variety of customised drop-down attributes. Some drop-down lists can have up to max 300 values. Unfortunately, when we want to create a search or just search using some customised attributes, there is not an option to select “All” only “Empty” or option to "select existing values".  This is very inconvenient as if we had for example 100 values in a drop-down, we would need to tick every single one to get full search. Why there is not an option to select ( All ), only ( Empty ) ? Search by “All” in the drop-down menu is really needed.   Show More

DOCS/ FOLDERS / DOCUMENTS   We have customised attribute called `Title` which is part of our Naming Standard. There are over 70 projects using this attribute already therefor we are after script which would copy parameter from customised attribute "Title" into build-in attribute "Description".   We were never told Description is a Title hence we created customised attribute for Title. Now we can not see Titles when we create Transmittals as there is Description attribute showing in a body of Transmittal which is empty in our documents. Show More

There needs to be an area within ACC where one can access messages, issue alerts or when they are notified through the comments field of an issue. Just relying on emails to notify people isn't a viable options as people can turn those off or just get lost amongst other emails. It would also be nice to have a filter option for Issues to be able to filter by mentions in the comments field. Show More

Enable the reading and import of additional fields when importing a schedule into the Schedule module, such as % Units Complete. Currently, our project progress is tracked using this field, but the module only supports % Duration Complete, which prevents us from using the Schedule feature in Build to properly monitor and compare planned versus actual progress. It would be highly valuable to allow the import of additional fields beyond those conventionally available, expanding the flexibility and accuracy of schedule-based progress tracking. Show More

When performing checks for ventilation or other pressure checks it is needed to mark up some figures or point on top of a diagram. This is about the air flow, or multiple test in a single environment. For this particulair checking it is needed to have this diagram.     Show More

As in BIM360, it would be good if we could also define and specify business areas in ACC. Show More

Limiting the photo management to ACC Build limits the use of 360-degree photos in normal work flow for existing conditions. It would make more sense to include that with the base Autodesk Construction Cloud subscription. It would also be useful in BIM360, other products from outside Autodesk already allow their use. Show More