Revit Ideas - Page 2

pcoelhoC5MAH · ‎05-08-2026

Hello I usually work with various software from different vendors. Besides receiving RVT files, I receive many STEPs and IFCs, but the problem is when I receive SKP (Sketchup files). They are usually lighter, but the problem is that when I put them inside Revit, the model becomes full of lines. I propose creating a soften edges command to "clean up" the lines and make the drawing look better.

ethant754AT · ‎05-06-2026

SO, you know when you're detailing a section (for a wood deck, for ex.), and you're going around and placing the detail item all over the place? Why not be able to set that detail item to appear on each of those elements automatically when cutting a section? I added a picture that probably makes more sense. I'd say set a specific detail item for a section of an element, mostly for the instances (such as lumber) where you can have a continuous or non-continuous member.

Mr.Borges · ‎05-04-2026

Some parameters, are not shown in Properties Panel even though it is a valid value for the specified element. Ex.: Structural Foundations does not show built in Volume parameter in Properties Panel. So for a rapid value check you need to create a entire schedule, just to see an element Volume value. Structural Columns does not show built in Length parameter in Properties Panel. So for a rapid value check you need again to create a entire schedule, just to see an element Length value. Every existing parameter should be available in Properties Panel, and if there are too much of them, allow user to select which ones will appear.

jfmillerWNCFB · ‎05-01-2026

Our workflow requires the up-to-date use of the "Model Coordination" module. "Model Coordination" only regenerates when a Revit model is published. Our designers have to remember to publish their model every night or the "Model Coordination" view doesn't update. In "Design Collaboration" there is a way to schedule publishing the model but only on a weekly basis. There should be a DAILY option that takes the requirement out of the designers hands.

wr.marshall · ‎04-16-2026

In Autodesk Revit, filled regions are currently view-specific, which leads to repeated drafting, inconsistencies, and extra coordination effort when the same graphic is required in multiple views. This idea proposes a new element type: Model Filled Regions. Model Filled Regions would behave like standard filled regions (sketch-based, using drafting patterns), but instead of being limited to a single view, they would be visible across multiple views, similar to how model lines differ from detail lines. Key Features Multi-view visibility A single filled region is visible in all views that intersect its host plane. Edit anywhere = update everywhere Changes made in any view update the element globally across all views. Sketch-based workflow Created and edited like standard filled regions (no new tools required). Plane-based hosting Hosted to: Levels Work planes Reference planes Optional visibility override Parameter: “Ignore host level for visibility” Allows the region to be shown across multiple levels regardless of view range. Uses drafting fill patterns Maintains current behavior with view-dependent scaling. Dedicated category Controlled via Visibility/Graphics under a new category: Model Filled Regions Non-rendering These elements are purely for documentation and are never visible in rendered views. Conversion tools Ability to convert: Detail Filled Region → Model Filled Region Model Filled Region → Detail Filled Region Problem This Solves Currently, repeating filled regions across views requires: Copying and pasting Grouping Redrawing This leads to: Inconsistencies between views Increased drafting time Coordination errors Why This Fits Revit This follows an existing and familiar pattern in Revit: Detail Lines → Model Lines Detail Components → Model Components Filled Regions → Model Filled Regions (proposed) It introduces no new paradigm, only extends existing behavior to improve efficiency. Summary Model Filled Regions would provide a simple, lightweight way to create consistent 2D graphics across multiple views, reducing duplication while keeping the flexibility of filled regions.

ViviNyehuusAndersen · ‎04-16-2026

Make it possible to add color fill legends in locked 3D views It is actually quite unreasonable that color fill is not available for all disciplines and components.

Ahmedshehata26112000 · ‎04-09-2026

I am writing to provide feedback regarding a basic functionality that seems to be missing, which is causing significant inconvenience in my daily workflow. Currently, there is no straightforward way to change the Leader color and line weight independently from the Text color directly through the "Properties" palette, a feature that has been fundamental and intuitive in AutoCAD for years. In many professional drafting scenarios, we need the leader to have a different color or line weight than the text for better visual hierarchy and clarity. Having these two elements linked to the same color property feels like an unnecessary limitation for such a sophisticated software. I strongly suggest implementing a dedicated "Leader Color" property in the upcoming updates. This small but essential change would greatly improve the user experience and drafting flexibility. Looking forward to seeing this improvement in future releases.

YuChengChung · ‎04-09-2026

Currently, Spot Elevation cannot snap to core faces of elements such as walls and floors in 3D, Plan and elevation view. It would be very helpful if Spot Elevation could: Snap directly to core faces Provide a computed / formula-based field that allows users to calculate the elevation beneath finish materials.

YuChengChung · ‎04-09-2026

Currently, there is no way to independently control the visibility of non-core material layers. Please consider adding functionality that allows users to control the visibility of non-core layers (finishes, structural layers, etc.) for walls and floors independently in different view types.

libengan · ‎04-04-2026

Revit could (and should) be a lot smarter when it comes to lineweights on elevations. Elevations are so flat looking, and we need to be able to automatically place thicker lines on silhouettes. Revit tries to do this with the "Silhouette" feature in the Model Display, but it's a super limited feature because it doesn't look at the distance to the surface behind it. Depth Cueing starts to show depth on an elevation, but doesn't change the lineweights. We need a "Silhouette Depth Cueing" feature that thickens lineweights by looking at the distance between surfaces. The farther the distance, the thicker the lineweight, and we should be able to control how drastic it applies this. The only way to currently accomplish this is to manually pick lines with the lineweight tool or sure annotation lines, which is quite frankly a waste of time when the model changes and you have to redo it all again.

victor_vijeuKD42L · ‎03-31-2026

We all know that Autocad and Revit Dimensioning commands don't work the same way, not the same behaviour. This situation is quite unfortunate , as we use both Autocad and Revit on daily bases, switching between them multiple times during the day. Revit dimensioning tools should be as option-rich and as precise in snap options previews as Autocad is. In Revit, there should be a snap option keyboard toggle for snaping on points and snaping on edges.

victor_vijeuKD42L · ‎03-30-2026

Isolate Workset option should be right next to Isolate Category and Isolate Element. It is easier to Isolate an entire Workset and edit elements in bulk, like change families, change level offsets, assign new levels, etc. Isolate Element is kinda useless because it doesn't show context (a.k.a. neighbouring parts). I always use Select element and Section Box it to see it in context.

dfoth · ‎03-30-2026

I'd like to be able to toggle between Preview Visibility On and Preview Visibility Off using a keyboard shortcut. Right now the Preview Visibility command is not able to be assigned a keyboard shortcut. This seems like an easy thing to fix. Imagine if Autodesk fixed a bunch of little things every year rather than pressing the use of AI every year. Its getting old. Your products aren't getting better by ignoring us.

VKes · ‎03-19-2026

Currently nested annotations do not export as a block when exported to CAD. I used to be able to do this in Revit a long time ago, but with the last few releases it does not work anymore. All nested generic annotations export as exploded lines. For example, it is very helpful to have a nested annotation symbol in an electrical fixture family. That way you can place a 3d fixture family and have the symbol at the same time in plan. Then when exporting to CAD the fixtures and/or symbols can be on their own layer making consultant coordination much easier. Right now the nested annotation family can be created using lines that can be put on a different layer in CAD; however, they're exploded rather than as a block. Currently it is necessary to either draw the symbol in the electrical fixture family, which is then non-annotative. Or, place the annotation symbol directly in the model, which would create additional work if fixtures are placed in 3d. This also complicates scheduling. Having a family with nested annotations that export as blocks would make it easier to coordinate, schedule, and easier when demolishing walls or removing walls in design (which would then demolish fixtures, etc). Either provide annotation families for every type of family that export as blocks. Or provide an option in the generic annotation to keep as a block when exported.

hwatsonKTPEA · ‎03-19-2026

InDesign has a view function called Overprint Preview, with the click of a button you can view the document as it would print. This would be immensely helpful to have in Revit. I know it can be done by using "preview" from the print dialogue or by management in view templates. Those are too many extra steps, we need a way to quickly view it as it would print and then quickly turn that function off again to continue working. Ideally you could customize the settings on that button as well to say what you don't want to see such as reference planes, unplaced sections, etc.

vdkrisie · ‎03-18-2026

Hi, When there are schedules placed on Sheets. They don't update automatically on the sheets. Maybe it would be convinient to have an option/ Button to refresh all schedules that are placed on sheets. When there are a lot of different sheets, we don't have to change the size of every schedule on every sheet so that it updates. somewhere in the top button or an option with a right click on a placed schedule. right click on schedule on sheet; - Update this schedule. - Update all placed schedules.

jmartucci2 · ‎03-17-2026

Revit needs to have a SketchFab integration where you can quickly and easily publish 3D views to their web viewer, sharable with a web link with permission settings. Sharing 3D views with clients and even contractors should be made as easy as possible. One side note is that it is baffling to me how I can view interactive photoreal 3D rendered views (even with animations) running in a web browser on SketchFab with substantially better quality and speed than inside the Revit program that is installed on any PC. A Few Examples: https://sketchfab.com/3d-models/architectural-visualisation-nordic-house-bfaeaaa0fb724327a642ee7e435671a5 https://sketchfab.com/3d-models/scandinavian-apartment-baked-scene-9d815881f59744758f44f4d25616af46 https://sketchfab.com/3d-models/st-pauls-cathedral-dome-london-a4f76d887d174a4392df04ab49230742 https://sketchfab.com/3d-models/tecnica-de-presentacion-by-laev-e8ecc0e026d345548f48ce2950f31fdc https://sketchfab.com/3d-models/dus150-f519222ad393470c8eb24a2f1f6d4e99

victor_vijeuKD42L · ‎03-17-2026

Most users that have been using the Stairs tool found it to be the one most horrible tool in Revit. It is totally non-intuitive, non-native English speakers are having troubles with all the parts' names and their dedicated families. You have to open several windows to set various options and sometimes you are wasting a LOT of time just to find the right setting. Autodesk Library contains no Metric Balusters , Posts, Railings, and other profile families for Stairs, which is quite sad situation. I have to change all such families to metric, creating multiple metric types and testing each one of them. Stairs tool should have a tabbed interface, something intuitive like Steel Connections have. And MOST IMPORTANT, the stairs should automatically update/reset when changing the calculating rules. You change the calculation rule, you delete the existing stair and recreate it again just to find out that the new rule still doesn't do the job right . Come on , Autodesk, the preview window should highlight each part , just like the Steel Connections preview does. And final consideration: Stairs are ALWAYS a structural element (load-bearing element). Please create separate commands for Structural Stairs and Architectural Stairs, just like the Walls commands are (WA / WS).

arshadshaikh997518 · ‎03-16-2026

Dear Autodesk Team, I am an MEP BIM Modeler working with Autodesk Revit for plumbing, drainage, HVAC, and fire fighting systems. I would like to suggest a feature that could significantly improve system understanding and BIM presentations. Idea: MEP Flow Visualization Currently in Revit, we can model complete MEP systems such as drainage pipes, water supply lines, HVAC ducts, and fire fighting networks. However, it would be very useful if Revit could also visualize the actual flow inside these systems. For example: 1. Drainage System Water flow visualization inside pipes according to the pipe slope. 2. Water Supply System Animated water flow direction inside supply pipes to help understand system behavior. 3. HVAC Duct System Airflow visualization inside ducts using moving arrows or particles. 4. Fire Fighting System Sprinkler water spray or water flow visualization for fire fighting systems. Integration with Navisworks In many BIM workflows, MEP models created in Autodesk Revit are exported to Autodesk Navisworks for coordination, review, and presentations. It would be very beneficial if this MEP Flow Visualization could also work after exporting the model to Navisworks. This would allow teams to: Visualize water flow in drainage systems Show airflow direction in HVAC ducts Demonstrate fire fighting water flow and sprinkler operation Use flow animations for client presentations and training This feature could also work together with Navisworks Timeliner to simulate system flow over time. Benefits Better understanding of MEP systems Improved BIM presentations and coordination meetings Easier training for new engineers and BIM modelers More interactive and intelligent BIM models This feature would help engineers, BIM professionals, and clients better understand how building systems actually function inside the model. Thank you for continuously improving Autodesk tools. Best regards MEP BIM Modeler

ks2_wmb · ‎03-16-2026

Raster printing is Not Great. I think most of us want the following upgrades to raster printing: 1) Vector printing should handle more features. Depth cueing and shadows are the two biggest pain points for most users. 2) When raster printing must be used, the embedded image should be higher quality. Revit internal PDF export is the worst, creating fuzzy JPG embeds. Printing to PDF through Bluebeam creates higher quality embedded images, but it's still a fuzzy mess. 3) Hybrid raster-vector printing. Render as much as possible through vector graphics, then use a raster underlay for what cannot be done through vector. 4) Raster printing always prints WYSIWYG, but vector printing has quirky behavior occasionally. Perhaps this will all be fixed (wiped away like a bad dream) when the new rendering engine is stable, mature, and ships to replace the current rendering engine. --- The below links are all threads about raster printing. While these threads are not necessarily all about identical issues, and some threads contain nuances not captured in my summary above, these are all threads complaining about raster printing. This thread exists to rally together all past votes and make the complaints easier to see. https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/exporting-elevation-with-depth-cueing-enabled-as-vector-during/idi-p/14055525 https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/vector-printing-with-raster-underlay/idi-p/7565402 https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/vector-shadows-in-hidden-line-prints/idi-p/6330690 https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/raster-printing-change-embedded-jpg-images-to-png-format/idi-p/11389094 https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/add-to-raster-printing-message-information-on-the-use-of/idi-p/9207269 https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/wysiwyg-amp-vector-printing/idi-p/7085229 https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/vector-option-for-export-to-pdf/idi-p/12764115 https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/print-nwd-nwc-links-on-revit-sheets-as-vectors-pdf/idi-p/7908186 https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/vector-atop-raster-when-printing-with-coordination-model/idi-p/12084197 https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/enable-pdf-export-with-black-lines-and-color-patterns-and-raster/idi-p/11762199

Community

SOFTEN EDGES

When cutting sections, be able to set/display material automatically

Properties Panel to show every available Parameter (including built in)

Allow Daily Publishing of Revit Models

Model Filled Regions (Multi-View Filled Regions)

Make it possible to add color fill legends in 3D views

Feature Request: Independent Leader Color Control in Properties (Similar to AutoCAD)

Allow Spot Elevation snap to Core layer or Calculated Finish Offsets

Control Visibility of Non-Core Layers for Walls and Floors

Silhouette lineweights should account for depth between elements in elevation views

Reconcile Dimensioning tools in Revit and Autocad

Isolate Workset and Hide Workset option

Preview Visibility Keyboard Shortcut

Nested Annotation As Block When Exported To CAD

Overprint Preview Toggle

Refresh button for Schedules on Sheets

SketchFab Integration

Intuitive interface for the Stairs Tool

MEP Flow Visualization in Revit and Navisworks

Raster printing is horrible [megathread]

Forums Links