BuildingConnected does not currently offer a setting to uncheck or exclude the bid form during that import process.  This would be extremely helpful Show More

As a General Contractor, we frequently need to track direct cell phone numbers for specific estimators that work for our subcontractors. Currently, we cannot add these to the subcontractor's profile without it being public or suggesting an edit on their account, or we have to use workaround methods like Company Tags and Internal Reviews. Please add a permanent, dedicated "Internal Phone Number" or "Internal Contact Note" field to subcontractor profiles that is 100% private to our GC firm. This will allow our estimating and project management teams to quickly call the right person without relying on external workarounds or messy spreadsheet trackers. This will help us avoid calling people who no longer work there or who do not work in the department we need.  Show More

Our company maintains a master BuildingConnected project template that includes subcontractor lists, bid packages, project bid forms, and bid package bid forms. This template is used as the starting point for all new projects to ensure consistency across our estimating and procurement teams. This makes it so we do not have to import from 3 different areas to create a new project. One limitation we have encountered is that bidder-specific Notes do not transfer when a new project is created from the template or when bid packages are imported into another project. The Notes field is not only used for project-specific information. It is also used to store important company knowledge about subcontractors that should follow the subcontractor wherever they are included in future projects. Examples include: New subcontractors that have recently reached out to our company Internal recommendations from project teams Information about who introduced the subcontractor Reference projects where the subcontractor was previously considered or used Regional office relationships and contacts Special qualifications or areas of expertise For example, a note may state: "XYZ Company reached out on 8/18/26 described the work they can do and look like a company we can consider. Send bids to test them out" If a user creates a new project from the template and XYZ Company is included in a bid package, that note should also carry over. Without the note, the team loses valuable context and may not realize the subcontractor is new to the company or understand why the subcontractor was added to the template in the first place. As employees change roles and new estimators take over projects, these notes become an important source of institutional knowledge. Today, that information is lost when projects are copied, requiring teams to maintain separate spreadsheets or manually re-enter notes. Requested Enhancement: Add an option when creating projects from templates, duplicating projects, or importing bid packages to: Copy Bidder Notes Preserve subcontractor-specific template notes Allow administrators to choose whether notes are included during duplication Business Benefits: Preserves institutional knowledge across all projects Provides visibility into new subcontractors being introduced to the company Reduces duplicate outreach and research efforts Improves consistency between estimating teams and offices Eliminates the need for external tracking spreadsheets Increases the value of BuildingConnected templates as a true company-wide knowledge base For organizations that rely heavily on templates, bidder notes are often just as valuable as the bidder list itself. Allowing these notes to transfer would help ensure important subcontractor information is available to every user and every project created from the template. Show More

On some projects, especially CM projects, bids are submitted directly to the Owner and not through the BC planroom.  A good feature would be the ability to turn off the bid form on those types of projects.  Thanks for your consideration! Show More

We recently noticed an update to the Contacts section within BuildingConnected qualification applications. Previously, we were able to manually enter Harris employees as company and prequalification contacts, regardless of whether those individuals were BuildingConnected users or associated with one of our Harris entity profiles. The new format appears to only allow us to select employees who are existing BuildingConnected users. Please see accompanying Word document with screenshots. This creates an issue because many qualification applications require multiple contacts, including Safety and QA/QC leadership. These individuals may need to be listed as prequalification contacts but are not necessarily BuildingConnected users or associated with our various Harris entity profiles. Under the previous format, we could manually enter these individuals as needed. This appears similar to the recent update BuildingConnected made within the General Section – Company Address, which also changed our ability to manually manage information. BuildingConnected Support previously advised us that they were unable to change or assist with that update. Can you please confirm whether the new Contacts format is a permanent BuildingConnected system update? If so, is there any way to manually add a contact who is not a BuildingConnected user, or revert to the previous functionality? If not, what is the recommended process for contractors who are required to provide Safety, QA/QC, or other departmental contacts who do not maintain BuildingConnected user accounts? Additionally, even if our departmental leadership held individual BuildingConnected user profiles, they can only be a user on one profile at a time and we need to list the same departmental leadership across multiple Harris entity profiles and qualification applications and cannot have these contacts be tied to only one profile.  Your Autodesk Construction Cloud Case Number is : 02312105 - Ticket Resolved, but BuildingConnected support is unable to assist with the new sections format configuration.  Show More

During our time using BuildingConnected we have found the database of subcontractors to be incredibly useful. However, even if a subcontractor has a BuildingConnected account, they sometimes do not prefer or outright refuse to use the platform, or the invitations are sent to their spam folder. As such, we have had to email them separately, which takes a significant amount of time to click through their contact card and copy their email. Additionally, we would like to be able to place the contacts in an internal spreadsheet for record keeping.   To make this process smoother, a function to export the bidders or invitee emails/contact cards on a given project as a CSV or, better yet, an excel sheet would greatly help. Show More

We would like to have a way to restore deleted approvals in the future through TradeTapp. @skerschieter @bbeverlin  Show More

Would be great to get hourly or daily summary of bids submitted etc in Building Connected. or at least have the option Show More

Right now if we create a proposal/submit a bid for a subcontractor the system does not send notifications which is concerning because the whole team isn't aware a bid has been uploaded. Show More

A good feature would be to select which state you are searching for subs in.  Example, we border NYC, so when searching by radius we get flooded with NY subs, but we only want to invite subs from NJ. Show More

There is currently the option to bulk download the Bid Archive report but that is only bid forms and proposal attachments submitted by the original companies. It does not include bid leveling (Private) attachments. Is there a way to add a toggle button to "Include Private Attachments" that can download all of the private attachments into the .ZIP bid Archive download? Show More

For some public bidding we have to disclose the estimate cost of a scope or work – is it possible to make the estimated cost visible to sub contractors? Show More

Hello,   Our trade of "Automated Layout" and "AutoCAD Drawing" is not listed as a trade and we're hoping you could add that to better assist us.   Thank you,   Samir Show More

Operating as a global company requires access to multiple currency types within a Bidding and Sourcing Platform.  The following currency types are missing from Building Connected which is limiting our ability to successfully utilize the application.   Missing Currencies Needed in BC CRC ₡ – Costa Rican Colón CHF Fr – Swiss Franc GBP £ – Great British Pound JPY ¥ – Japanese Yen CNY ¥ – Chinese Yuan KRW ₩ – South Korean Won TWD NT$ – New Taiwan Dollar THB ฿ – Thai Baht VND ₫ – Vietnamese Dong SGD $ – Singapore Dollar IDR Rp – Indonesian Rupiah MYR RM – Malaysian Ringgit RUB ₽ – Russian Ruble PHP ₱ – Philippine Peso     Show More

When initiating a renewal request in TradeTapp, we would like the ability to select which contact receives the renewal from the contractor's full list of approved contacts — not just the Primary Contact. Current Behavior: When requesting a renewal, the only editable field is "Questionnaire Sent." There is currently no way to choose or change which contact the renewal is sent to; it defaults to the Primary Contact regardless of who actually manages or completes the prequalification application on the contractor's side. The Problem: In practice, the Primary Contact listed for a contractor is not always the person who fills out or manages the prequalification/renewal application. Contractors often designate other approved contacts (e.g., a safety manager, office administrator, or dedicated prequalification contact) to handle this task. Because the renewal request can only go to the Primary Contact, it frequently reaches someone who isn't expecting it, isn't equipped to complete it, or has to manually forward it — creating delays, missed renewals, and unnecessary back-and-forth. Requested Change: Add a dropdown field on the renewal request screen that allows the user to select from the contractor's full list of approved contacts (as maintained in BuildingConnected), rather than defaulting to the Primary Contact only. Why This Matters: This would significantly reduce delays in the renewal process, ensure requests reach the correct point of contact the first time, and better reflect how contractors actually manage prequalification internally. It's a small addition to the existing renewal workflow but would meaningfully improve accuracy and turnaround time for both our team and the contractors we work with. We'd welcome the opportunity to discuss this further if helpful, and appreciate your consideration of this enhancement.   @skerschieter @bbeverlin Show More

Construction companies utilize medical services to take care of their workers during projects.  They request nurses, paramedics and other medical professionals to be onsite on many project and also have telemedicine capabilities.  We provide these services, however, there is no medical services category, so it is difficult to categorize our work and we get many bid invites that are not remotely close to the services we provide.  It would be great to add a medical services category or "onsite medical services" category to BuildingConnected to make the platform more accurate and efficient. Show More

BuildingConnected should reconsider how the "Send message" option is structured.  It would be helpful to be able to include the subs that are noted on a project as "Not Bidding" when sending messages.  This would be especially helpful when the GC has been awarded a project and the subs may have chosen "Not Bidding" for various reasons at the time the ITB was sent and may want to be able to bid or send a BAFO now that the GC has been awarded.  For example:  The sub didn't have time to prepare a bid upon the ITB and may have time now.  The sub may have missed the initial ITB and would be interested now. The sub now has added services that they can perform and are applicable to this project. The sub has new employees that would be interested in this type of project. The sub prefers to only bid when they know the GC has an award. Show More

BuildingConnected Pro currently supports only a limited number of currencies. Please add more currency options to better serve customers, particularly those in Asia. Show More

BuildingConnected GCs occasionally make mistakes when setting up invitations or bid packages. Currently, there is no way to delete a published bid package — so when a mistake occurs, the only option is to manually remove bidders one at a time to revoke their access. This requires multiple clicks per subcontractor contact and becomes extremely time-consuming when hundreds of bidders have been invited. Please consider adding a bulk-remove option that allows GCs to remove all bidders from a bid package at once. This would significantly reduce the manual effort required to correct mistakes and help GCs maintain better control over bid package access without compounding an already frustrating situation. Show More