Having the ability to edit a BPA or CPA approval workflow and re-order steps/insert a step in between existing steps would be helpful. Currently if I want to add an additional step in the 2nd stage of a 3 step workflow, I have to delete or edit the 3rd step, rather than being able to create a new step at the end and drag and drop it where I want it to be in the workflow. Show More

For compliance purposes, we have created and deployed via the Hub Admin Library a handful of form templates to all active projects inside our Hub, including the Project templates so they will be included when new projects are created.  Some of these forms are quick to do and done weekly.  From a management perspective, these are required to be completed for compliance purposes, and we would like to be able to see, from the Hub Administrative level, all forms that have been completed.  Additionally, it would be great to leverage this data for reporting Show More

In your "Forma for constructio Ideas" please add Proest to the categories Show More

In the assemblies formula field, using copy/paste usually results in loosing the source data and not copying properly or at the wrong place in the equation. Also, when using "." this most often results in the text following the "." to now appear at the very beginning of the equation.   Please fix these bugs as it make it very challenging to create long formulas with conditions Show More

Based on current ACC functionality and help documentation: No robust reporting capability exists to analyze correspondence that has been sent (e.g., by date, type, sender, recipient, or status). Correspondence Types are static and limited, offering minimal configuration beyond basic categorization. No ability to “Send on Behalf Of” another role (e.g., Document Control, Project Manager, or JV entity), which is a common requirement on large construction projects. No templated message content tied to correspondence types, resulting in inconsistent messaging and increased administrative effort. These limitations create real project risks and inefficiencies: Lack of auditability: Teams cannot easily demonstrate what formal correspondence was sent, when, and by whom. Inconsistent communication: Without templates, similar correspondence varies by sender, increasing contractual and claims risk. Administrative bottlenecks: Document Control teams must rely on workarounds (manual logs, exports, or parallel systems). Reduced adoption: Teams revert to email or external tools when ACC does not support required correspondence workflows. Proposed Enhancements Correspondence Reporting Enable reports and exports for: Sent correspondence Correspondence by type Sender / recipient Date ranges and status Align reporting behavior with other ACC modules (e.g., RFIs, Submittals). Enhanced Correspondence Types Allow administrators to: Configure correspondence types with required fields Assign default recipients Enforce naming or numbering standards “Send on Behalf Of” Capability Permit authorized users to send correspondence on behalf of: Project roles (e.g., Document Control) Companies or JV entities Maintain full audit history showing the actual sender and delegated role. Templated Message Content Allow message body templates tied to correspondence types. Support placeholders (project name, reference numbers, dates). Improve consistency and reduce repetitive manual entry. Show More

currently only Get requests are supported through version 1 of the Forma API. the ability to create and edit Packages would be extremely helpful for us when we are packaging hundreds of files up for CAD file delivery link to current API reference: https://aps.autodesk.com/en/docs/acc/v1/reference/http/packages-list-packages-GET/ Show More

We need an option to have the entire list of companies the message was sent to show in the display email only to our team. Instead of showing the amount of companies it was sent to.  Show More

Mandatory BREL report submissions and energy performance certificate (EPC) compliance sign-off What we need:      A simple tool (preferably inside the Forma Build mobile app) which follows the requirements of Part L which shows a good example of the photo to be taken allows the photo to be taken in app enables a sign off by the site team and the SAP assessor can export a PDF report with the required information in a sensible format Plot/Location could be added automatically            Stretch target: Use AI to assess in real time if the photo that’s been taken is appropriate giving a green light or red light (take it again) Current solution for Part L photo recording is leaving the company at regulatory risk. There is no way of efficiently managing this within Forma and it could easily be a function in the mobile app Show More

Love the fact that we can have favorites in the Forma tool chest. A couple of small tweaks / suggestions to make this a little more useful. From what I am seeing, the favorites are currently attached to the individual and stay consistent across all projects.  Not all project use the same Forma tools If the favorites could be specific to the user, but also specific to the project This would reflect the fact that a Forma project where site management is using forms but no schedule compared to another project that is more predominantly using say cots and assets. If the Project Admins could set the project prioritised tools (then the users have the ability to tailor to their own project role needs. Show More

We noticed that if project members are located in a different time zone than the Forma project itself, when they fill in the date custom attributes in Cost Management, whether it's for contract or for change order or for payment application, the value that show up in the generated template can be different (+ or - 1 day) from the value that we entered in Forma Cost Management. I've already discussed this matter with technical support team and they have understood and realized the problem, but have no roadmap on fixing it yet. Having this bug, is a major downside when it comes to international companies who operate and work in multiple regions. Even within one country we could have multiple time zones, and not everyone exactly work on the same area as the project is located at. So I would like to ask you to please fix this bug. Many thanks. Show More

This suggestion concerns the use of forms in forma Build. When exporting a form to PDF, text is added to the header and footer of the exported form, and we would like to remove this text. We are requesting a feature update that allows us to export the form without including this text. This request is based on the   fact that clients have asked us to remove this text when we submit documents to them. Show More

When exporting files you only see the Issue Pin and not the data that is in the issue. This is not helpful when someone who does not have Forma wants to the view the issue. There is no way to actually export the issues associated with that file!  Show More

We need the ability for a single correspondence thread to contain multiple correspondence types as the discussion evolves.   In real project workflows, a conversation often starts as general correspondence, then progresses into a change request, and may ultimately result in a contract variation. At the moment, these stages can require separate records, which breaks the context and makes it harder to follow the full decision trail.   Example workflow within the same thread: Correspondence 1 - General Correspondence - asking question to contractor Correspondence 2 - General Correspondence - response from contractor Correspondence 3 - Change Request - requesting formal confirmation of contract variation Correspondence 4 - Contract Variation - confirmation of contract variation   Ideally, each item in a thread could have its own correspondence type, while still remaining part of the same conversation history. Show More

Enhance Review Workflow Templates by adding a "Default Watchers" field (auto-included observers), as a way to add roles for transparency ("Info-Only” -visibility without approval responsibility). This would align with existing RFI and Submittal templates.          This enhancement would significantly improve transparency, governance, and usability of review workflows. Today, Review Workflows require watchers to be either: Explicitly added as approvers to gain visibility, or Manually included by the submitter in the "Notify other project members" filed when creating a review.   This creates several challenges: Limited visibility for key stakeholders (e.g., PMs, leads, cross-functional teams) who need awareness but are not decision-makers Manual effort and user error — relying on submitters to consistently remember to add the same stakeholders to the “Notify other project members” field for every review Incorrect workflow selection often going unnoticed until late in the process, increasing rework and delays Overuse of approver roles simply to provide visibility, which weakens governance and blurs accountability   This gap has been raised multiple times across teams and user groups. @coreda.ehrhart Show More

Page Shift Improvements For Takeoff   One of the most important portions of the AutoDesk suite for my role as an Estimator is the Takeoff system.  Shortcuts and workflows that change the time spent utilizing Takeoffs create big impacts on my workflow.    A small but largely helpful improvement would be the creation of either a toolkit or even "CTRL" functions to allow users to quickly tab backward and forwards through different pages of the drawing.    This, in concert with better preprocessing, would allow me to pick up a significant portion of my time. It does this be reducing the amount of time I spend looking off of the drawings and into the index, and by reducing the amount of hand motion required to select and create the takeoff.  Show More

When you share drawings via link, only the drawing number and version are viewable. The drawing title is needed since someone may want to find specific drawings and not download all at one time. There are AHJ, utility providers and others that will not use ACC and require the drawings be sent to them that need this functionality. Show More

When a comment is added to an issue, only the users name is displayed/recorded. Our users would like the users Company and discipline to be displayed/recorded as well, as this is what is needed for their records. Could this please be enabled? Show More

There needs to be a way to set up our company profile so that ALL invitations from clients get routed to a specific person/people. We have an ongoing issue with clients choosing the wrong contact person, invite is ignored, opportunity to bid is missed. Show More

Need to use multi select type when creating a custom attribute in Docs in Forma. Show More