Please make the direction of the dynamic/parametric symbol for column+beam bracing/kickers able to switch directions. We want the symbols to show starting from the column, but sometimes the symbol shows starting from the beam instead. I had trouble figuring out the logic behind when and why Revit chooses one or the other. This would help immensely - right now my workaround is to hide the kicker symbol in plan and place a kicker symbol I created instead.   Kicker symbol from column:   Kicker symbol from beam:   Show More

The AISC added steel shape sizes with its release of the 16th edition that was issued in 2023.  Those sizes are not available when you use the "Load Autodesk Family".     Could we get the families updated to have all the current sizes added to Revit?    The database is available on the AISC website.  Show More

Il serait utile de pouvoir créer un groupe de pièces qui calcule automatiquement la surface totale à partir des pièces qui le composent. L'objectif serait de pouvoir étiqueter ce groupe directement sur les plans, à l'image du fonctionnement des zones CVC qui regroupent des espaces. La surface totale serait mise à jour automatiquement dès qu'une pièce est ajoutée, supprimée ou que sa surface évolue. Ce besoin est particulièrement présent dans les projets de logements, où il serait très utile de pouvoir afficher, avec une seule étiquette, le numéro du logement, son type (T2, T3, etc.) et sa surface totale, sans avoir recours à Areabook, à Dynamo ou d'autres extensions, qui alourdissent considérablement le workflow pour une fonctionnalité qui pourrait être gérée nativement dans Revit. Show More

Hello, Revit has recently given a little more control over the layers within the wall assemblies, but I feel that there is more that can be done to better allow for elements such as continuity of a fire separation. Some ideas that might help are:  Give wall assemblies a priority ranking and maybe a drop-down menu on how other wall types should interact with it. Example: Allowing walls with a lower fire-resistance rating(FRR) to terminate at the wall assembly rather than traditionally "joining" into the wall; allowing for walls with a greater FRR to overrule and essentially run right through the wall. Give more operable "wrapping" options/settings, perhaps at an instance level (right click on wall end) or maybe through a series of set conditions (such as open ended wall vs a T-intersection, and so on), for the finish/wrapping (non-core areas) of the finish layers. I know Revit already has the "Wrapping at Ends/Inserts" feature, however I find it inconsistant and provides next to no control. Create a modified/customized wall join function that blends the wall join tool with features similar to the Cut Profile tool. Have this be a 3D property that affects the entire height of the assembly. This would allow for custom wall interaction which is important when you have different wall types intersecting one another where you need certain spaces for materials and properties such as acoustic control and fire-resistance continuity. Also useful for non-typical angle joins, where you may not want a pointed end. Give an option for a wall to join with another wall without physically affecting the wall. Such cases arise where walls adjoin but then one wall is dragged over and out of its originally placing. Currently, I handle situations like this by Disallowing Join then aligning the walls as needed (especially needed when working with Curtain Wall). While I know most of the options have drafting work-arounds, it would be nice to be able to more simply model these with behavioral wall properties. By doing so, it could also allow Revit the possibility to better analyze wall functions such as fire-resistance continuity or even area/room floor-area counts. Show More

Seria ótimo se no conjunto de deslocamento do Revit pudesse além de deslocar os elementos nos eixos também ter a opção de rotacionar a peça deslocada, assim daria mais opção de visualização da peça ou da modelagem. Show More

Do not include Filter Override for Analytical Members and Panels Local axis, beacause can't see orientation. See attached picture. Show More

when designing a building you're often considering the open space a person needs to move freely (for example the space you need in a hallway, the space someone in a wheelchair needs to move in a building, ...) It would be more beneficial if the people content elements would not be considered as an obstacle in a route analysis but would have an analysis funtction that checks if there are any obstacles in between the circle.   It could be pretty much the same function as the path of travel where you can choose what categories are considered obstacles. It would also be usefull to run this analysis on all "people content" elements of the same type so you could analyse if a building is compatible for people with a disability.   If these families would get their own category you could still use the previous functionality to analyse social distancing but you can also choose to only check against other categories with the same options as the route analysis options.   Show More

Many engineers are not using RSA because of its' old and weird interface. Although RSA is very capable and full of very advanced features, people won't use it because the interface is a hassle. Advanced features require opening cascading windows, the closing them up. I mean, it's worse than V/G in Revit.  It is a no brainer to have a common interface. It would save a lot of time for both engineers and software maintainers. I prefer a big window with many tabs (like V/G) instead of many small cascading windows. Everybody would be using a large screen these days, we ain't working in Windows XP anymore.  Show More

The current "Orient to View" function in Revit's 3D view right-click menu can be time-consuming, especially on large projects with dozens or even hundreds of views. Users must manually scroll through a nested list of Floor Plans, Sections, Elevations, etc., to find the desired view. This proposal suggests adding a search bar at the top of the "Orient to View" menu, allowing users to quickly locate and select a specific view by name. Benefits: Saves time during coordination and modeling. Improves usability in large projects. Reduces user error and frustration when trying to orient a 3D view. Makes the feature more accessible to new users. Example Functionality: Right-click in a 3D view → Orient to View → A searchable dialog box appears. User types part of the view name (e.g., "Level 2" or "SEC-A"), and matching options filter live. Clicking the result instantly orients the 3D view to the selected view. Show More

Revit can color 3D elements by workset. It should be able to color all 3D elements by any common parameter of those elements, like DiRoots does. E.g. Color steel elements by material: S235, S275, S355. Color concrete elements by concrete strength class: C20/25, C25/30, C30/37, etc .This should be very useful for the analytical model as well: differentiating materials' strength at a glance. Automatic coloring by fire rating would be amazing also. Show More

hello I think we need to add graphical design to show how this facture really work, to make it easier to understand the factor and how its work    Show More

Currently, Revit limits custom work plane creation to selecting existing physical elements or predefined levels. This is restrictive especially in analytical modeling where elements like inclined panels or members often need to reference non-existent or virtual planes.     Introduce the ability to create a work plane by selecting three points in space or by entering coordinates- similar to the functionality in Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis. This feature would allow users to model inclined analytical geometry more accurately and efficiently, without the need to rely on placeholder physical elements just to define a reference plane. Show More

In Revit Structure, stairs are currently treated purely as architectural elements, which prevents them from being included in the analytical model. This presents a limitation when dealing with stairs that clearly serve a structural purpose and are made of structural materials.         Allow stairs to be marked as structural elements when composed of structural materials. Once marked, they should be convertible to analytical panels just like floors or walls. Similarly, Ramps should also be treated as structural floors and allow conversion to analytical panels. Implementing this would greatly improve the workflow for structural engineers, who currently must manually model equivalent analytical panels to represent stairs and ramps. Show More

The new method of terrain modeling using topographic solids no longer allows for the calculation of cut and fill volumes as was possible with modeling using topographic surfaces. It would be great to have this feature back. Show More

please create a gumball for Revit elements in perspective views at least, this will make life so much easier, this should be priority number one for  your next release ! Just click the arrow and move or rotate in that direction when you input a value , like why is Revit the only program in the world that doesn't have this !      Show More

One issue that we have noticed is when working on the Landscape Areas, vertical greens on the facade or walls are not represented correctly. can this be included in the roadmap Show More

Adding the ability to select "Number of Phases" in the Properties Palette for the Electrical Design Analysis Tool for Revit '23 and newer.   While trying to use the Electrical Design Analytical tool within Revit '23, when entering our electrical loads for calculations they are all locked/greyed out on 3 phase power in the Properties Palette with no option that I see how to change between a 3 phase or a single phase power source.   Ex. If you enter a 120 Volt load it is always locked at 3 phase causing the calculations to be wrong, instead it would need be 120 V single phase load. Show More

I find it frustrating that Revit's analytical mode does not allow us to model soil loads directly on foundation walls. This limitation forces us to export the model to Robot Structural Analysis (RSA) for this critical step, which is time-consuming and disrupts workflow. It would be highly beneficial to have a feature in Revit that lets us define soil pressures or lateral loads on foundation walls within the analytical model. This capability would save time, streamline analysis, and reduce the dependency on external software for common structural tasks. Please consider adding this functionality to improve Revit's structural analysis capabilities. Show More

Hi Everyone,   The idea is when transferring model only from Robot to Revit , we should maybe have an option that prevents loads from being transferred. The loads still exist in the original Robot model, but only the analytical panels and their results are transferred.     Regards,   Nader ASSAF Show More