The new classification system in ReCap Pro 2026 is causing significant delays during the saving process — even when classifications are not needed. For users working with clean scan data intended for external modeling or analysis (e.g., Scan-to-BIM workflows), these delays add unnecessary processing time with no benefit. Previous versions (e.g., ReCap 2023) allowed for greater control — either skipping classification entirely or canceling it mid-process. Please consider adding a toggle or checkbox in project settings or preferences to disable classification and bypass "saving classifications" during save/export operations. This would greatly improve performance for power users and professionals who need speed and simplicity over automated classification. Reintroducing this control would be a welcome return of functionality that many relied on in earlier versions. Show More

Scan to Mesh was already revived, please bring back also the Project Cleanup function. Show More

Consider this workflow.  Drafter/modeller opens AutoCAD, attaches (xref) a recap project. Then isolates and is able to select a specific set of points, and runs a create mesh command that creates a mesh in the DWG in the same location as the points that were selected. Result is the existing asset captures quickly and accurately.  Local processing would be the obvious first step, but for more complicated or larger mesh areas a cloud option might be preferred.      Current situation: Drafter/modeller opens AutoCAD and attaches (xref) a recap project. This can be modelled by using the limited feature identification tools, but is time consuming. Alternatively the drafter can then go to Recap, find the same dataset, select the points and create a mesh. Once complete the mesh is then downloaded, it can be imported into AutoCAD and then needs to be transformed/moved to the correct coordinates (which basically requires a visual alignment).    This takes significantly more time and is much less accurate.  Show More

Now you can update origin into a point but it would be wonderful if you could update origin by typing the coordinates. Right now the point where you want to update the origin needs to be there. Often the origin does not have any points.  Show More

We should have the ability to select a point and change the property by entering a value for X,Y,Z.  The entire point cloud could then change position based on this change.  Also, it would be nice to rotate the entire point cloud based on a reference plane or line or property value and resave.   I don't care if it takes a long time to recalculate every point.  It's easier than going back to registration, changing it there and then exporting again.   Where you at Autodesk??? Show More

Regions are great (when they work), but I was recently in conversation with someone how was trying to create regions in a new scan and I had to explain that points could only belong to one region at a time which got me thinking: It'd be nice if I could give a collection of points multiple labels/regions.   Eg. I go through and I sort out all the structural members in a scan and label them 'structural', and then I go and label all the walls as 'walls', pipes as 'pipes' etc. Then I go through and sort out the scan by Bays, Bay A1-B6, Bay A7-B10, etc. Then I maybe go and give a region a project number.   For this to work, I would essentially have to have points belong to multiple regions at the same time and then to have a means to group similar types of regions together or filter between multiple region groups. (eg. Show me the Pipes and Structural in Bay A1-B6. Show More

Users should be able to see the properties of each of the "Scan Locations" and "Classifications" that are listed in the project navigator.   For example, I would like to minimally see the number of points in each Scan Location as well as each Classification. This would greatly help the user to quickly see what effect the Automatic Ground Classification (AGC) and the Decimate Points (DP) tool had on the point cloud.   Another feature that would be beneficial would be the ability to compare the statistics of the point cloud before and after running DP.  The values I would like to know would be the mean and average change in elevation across the area of the point cloud.  A representation similar to the Volumes Dashboard in Civil 3D as well as just the data would be even better so that I would know where the decimated surface might not be as accurate as I need it to be and therefore I would need to do more work at sectioning off areas in ReCap before decimating.  I need more information on what ACG and DP is really doing to the point cloud to be confident that it is not going to cause problems due to more inaccuracy than I has assuemed.  I can go through the process of bringing into Civil 3D each time I run ACP or DP, which I am having to do now, but in my opinion, I think it is really something that shouldn't require the use of Civil 3D to analyze the point cloud.  The function should be in ReCAP already.  Show More

A feature in most, if not all of the competitor point cloud editors, is to delete the points outside a select window/marquee, as well as the option (the current Recap option) to delete points within. Would greatly speed up point cloud editing. Show More

When creating dimensions from columns or large pieces of equipment often we need to dimension to the centerline.  It would be nice if we are able to dimension directly from the center line like we are able to dimension from a pipe currently.  Currently we have to create a dimension from the face of equipment to opposite side of the equipment.  Then we need to do a dimension from the flange of a column to the opposite flange.  We can then assume the centerline of each.  Finally we can take the calculated centerlines and add those values to the final dimension from flange of column to face of the equipment.  To check true alignment of equipment you need to check centerline against multiple columns so you could go through creating 18-24 dimensions when you really only need to do 6-8.   Hopefully you can follow the jumbled mess but I attached a picture to help.  Also can we finally fix the rounding of dimensions?  You can see in the image that 4/8" is showing rather than 1/2".  Our engineers love to poke fun at that one for the past 2 years.   Thanks, Show More

Either Publish the shared coordinate from Revit to the point cloud file or get it from the point cloud file. Publish and Acquire coordinates between Revit and Recap (Point cloud)   Example: When you start a new project or have an existing one. The first thing to do is to define the shared coordinate where everyone sticks to. This can be a physical object (survey marker) in the real world like you see below. When you scan the new or existing location you could set the shared origin and publish it to all other team members.     Note: As this is an idea that is related to Recp and Revit I placed the Idea also on the Revit Idea Forum Show More

I am logging this on behalf of a customer in Germany:   "We would like an option to sanitize RealViews I’m sure you are aware of the strict German privacy laws – we currently have a manual process to blur faces and vehicle registration plates, but it would be a quicker process if it could be done in the RealViews themselves. ZFS SDK Implementation Selection scans are a key feature on the Z+F Imager series, to capture targets at long range for a superior registration result. However, when importing a ZFS with selection scans associated with it into Recap Pro, the selections no longer seem to be associated with the main scan. The selections simply load as a new standalone scan. This loses the option of using these selections to position the main scan, which limits the usefulness of Recap Pro as a registration tool. Is there the possibility to improve this implementation?"   -Scott  Show More