FlexSim Knowledge Base
Announcements, articles, and guides to help you take your simulations to the next level.
Sort by:
A common question is whether the version of FlexSim must match the version of AutoCAD, Inventor, Revit, Factory Design Utilities, or Vault.   The answer depends on whether you are importing a file or using a connected Autodesk product workflow.   Importing CAD drawings as model backgrounds   AutoCAD drawings can be imported into FlexSim as model backgrounds—for example, to provide a floor plan that helps you position simulation objects and accurately represent distances within a facility.   There is no requirement to create or resave a drawing in the same version of AutoCAD as FlexSim. In general, DWG imports are not tied to a matching AutoCAD annual release.   However, successful translation can still depend on the contents and version of the individual file. It is not possible to guarantee that every file produced by every historical version or third-party CAD application will translate identically. For the best results before importing a floor plan:   Remove unnecessary text, hatching, layers, and geometry. Check the drawing’s units and scale. Move relevant geometry reasonably close to the drawing origin. See Importing CAD Drawings and Floor Plans for additional guidance on DWG preparation and troubleshooting.   Importing CAD as the visual shape of a FlexSim object   CAD and 3D graphics files can also be used to change the visual appearance of an object in a FlexSim model. This is a file-import workflow rather than a live connection to the application that originally created the file.   In FlexSim versions 2024.2 to 2026, a separate AdskInterop module is required for Autodesk specific workflows. In Autodesk FlexSim 2027 and beyond, that functionality is baked into the software, no longer requiring a separate module.   Autodesk CAD formats that can be imported into FlexSim include:   .dwg .dxf .ipt .iam .rvt .3ds .fbx FlexSim also supports many non-Autodesk formats including:   .ac .dae .igs .jt .obj .skp .stp .usd For the comprehensive list of formats and additional information on working with 3D objects in FlexSim, refer to Creating and Importing Custom 3D Objects.   As with model backgrounds, these imports do not normally require the originating design application to have the same annual version as FlexSim. Compatibility is determined by the file format, the way the file was written, and the translation technology available in the installed FlexSim release.   Factory Design Utilities interoperability   Using Factory Design Utilities in conjunction with FlexSim is considered a connected product workflow, so its version requirements are different from ordinary file import. When using interoperability workflows such as connecting a layout between FlexSim and FDU, the version years need to match for each product involved. For example, when using FlexSim 2027, use:   Factory Design Utilities 2027 Inventor 2027 AutoCAD 2027 The annual versions should remain aligned. Using FlexSim 2027 with an earlier or later FDU installation is not a supported version combination. FlexSim releases will be updated as necessary to support the latest compatible Factory Design Utilities release.   This constraint does not apply to using the Factory Asset Browser within FlexSim. Using this feature does not require FDU to be installed at all, let alone matching versions. For more information about the FDU integration with FlexSim, please visit: FlexSim 2027 Help | Factory Design Utilities (FDU) | Autodesk   Vault interoperability   The FlexSim Vault integration is also considered a connected product workflow, so versions need to match between the products to access Vault features directly within FlexSim. For example, FlexSim 2027 should be used with Vault 2027. However, FlexSim models can be saved directly through the Vault interface, regardless of what version used.    The version requirement of using the built-in integration applies only to FlexSim and Vault Client. Vault Client and Vault Server compatibility vary slightly, where Vault Server may work with up to 2 earlier versions of Vault Client.   For more information about the Vault integration with FlexSim, please visit: FlexSim 2027 Help | Autodesk Vault | Autodesk   Summary   DWG or DXF model background: No matching AutoCAD annual release is required. Translation depends on the individual file. Imported custom 3D shape: No matching authoring-application release is generally required. Use a supported file format. Factory Design Utilities workflow: Match the annual release—FlexSim 2027 with FDU, Inventor, and AutoCAD 2027. Vault integration: Match the annual release—FlexSim 2027 with Vault 2027.
View full article
FlexSim 2026 Stable is now available for download.   You can view the Release Notes in the online user manual.   FlexSim 26.0.2 Stable Release Notes   If you have bug reports or other feedback on the software, please create a new post in FlexSim Forums.
View full article
One method for creating a 4-station rotating turntable using process flow.
View full article
Demonstrating Map Array Initialization and Population
View full article
FlexSim 2025 LTS is now available for download.   You can view the Release Notes in the online user manual.   FlexSim 25.0.12 Release Notes   If you have bug reports or other feedback on the software, please create a new post in FlexSim Forums.
View full article
FlexSim 2026 Stable is now available for download.   You can view the Release Notes in the online user manual.   FlexSim 26.0.1 Stable Release Notes   If you have bug reports or other feedback on the software, please create a new post in FlexSim Forums.
View full article
Gather the statistics of total travel distance of a task executer that is created via process flow
View full article
When working with complex hierarchical models in FlexSim, referencing objects deep inside a structure can quickly become difficult to manage. When not using multiple centre port connections (which gets messy)  users often rely on manually created labels and pointers, but that in turn can  introduce extra work and inconsistency—especially when deciding whether a label should reference a single object or an array. This post describes a small set of user commands, packaged as an auto-installing user library, that automatically builds and maintains hierarchical object references based on each object’s role. The goal is simple: allow users to reference objects using intuitive chains like: current.printerCell.rewinder.turret without manually creating or maintaining those labels. What this does This system automatically: creates label pointers based on object roles (functionname) builds those references up the hierarchy optionally propagates system-level references downward handles single vs multiple objects automatically rebuilds everything on reset so it stays consistent How it is set up The functionality is delivered as: an auto-installing user library containing the commands a template container that includes: a reset trigger that calls: containerReset(current) predefined labels: functionname systemContainer Users can drop this container into their model and begin assigning functionname labels to objects. The rest is handled automatically at reset. Core concept Each object declares its role using a label such as: functionname = "rewinder" From this, the system builds references dynamically using only the tree hierarchy. A key point is that this is not limited to containers. Any object, including standard FlexSim fixed resources such as processors, sources, queues, and sinks, can and should also be given a functionname when you want it to participate in the reference structure. That means this system maps not just structure, but function. How it works 1. Reset seeds the reference map On reset, each relevant container calls: containerReset(current) This starts the process of rebuilding all references from the current tree structure. 2. Objects register themselves upward If an object has a non-empty functionname, it adds a reference to itself on the next relevant level above it. So if a rewinder contains a turret, the rewinder can gain: rewinder.turret 3. Non-functional levels are skipped If an intermediate object has no functionname, the logic recurses through it rather than making it part of the reference chain. That means purely structural levels can exist in the tree without cluttering the reference path. So a structure like: printerCell   └─ layoutContainer        └─ rewinder             └─ turret can still produce: printerCell.rewinder.turret even though layoutContainer exists physically in the tree. 4. System containers propagate references downward If an object has: systemContainer = true then its own functionname is pushed down to all contained objects. So if printerCell is marked as a system container, nested objects can directly reference: current.printerCell This makes it easy for deeply nested components to find the root system they belong to. 5. Repeated roles become arrays automatically If a label already points to one object and a second different object needs to be stored under the same role name, the value is automatically converted into an array. So if one rewinder contains multiple turrets, then: rewinder.turret becomes an array of turret pointers instead of a single pointer. Users do not need to decide this in advance. Works for both machines and factories A useful feature of this approach is that a “system” does not have to mean a single tightly integrated machine. A system can be: one complex interconnected machine acting as a whole one cell within a larger process a factory made up of linked but physically distinct cells As long as those objects live under a meaningful tree structure, the same logic works. A printer cell can be used as a standalone system, then placed inside a larger factory container and reset again to gain one more level of functional context. That makes the approach scalable from machine-level modeling to line-level or factory-level organization. Example model I’m also including an example printer cell model where the labels are not pre-populated. You can: open the model press Reset inspect the created labels on the objects Then you can place that same printer cell inside a factory container, reset again, and inspect the results after the hierarchy changes. That gives a simple way to see the library working in both a standalone and larger-system context. Implementation details Below are the three user commands that make this work. 1. containerReset(<container>) Purpose This is the reset entry point. It does three things: registers the current object upward on its parent if it has a functionname if the current object is a systemContainer, propagates a reference to itself downward through everything beneath it calls the recursive function that builds the rest of the pointer map below it So this command seeds both the upward and downward context, then delegates the deeper hierarchy building. 2. assertReference(<objectToAddReference>, <referenceName>, <referenceObject>) Purpose This utility adds a reference safely and automatically handles whether the label should be: a single pointer or an array of pointers If the label is empty, it stores a single object pointer. If it already points to a different object, it converts the value into an array. If it is already an array, it adds the new object only if it is not already present. This is what removes the need for users to decide ahead of time whether a role is unique or repeated. 3. assertallobjectpointers(<involved>, <container>) Purpose This is the recursive traversal function. It walks downward through the tree under container and looks for objects with a non-empty functionname. When it finds one, it adds a reference on current using that object’s function name. When it encounters an object with no functionname, it does not stop. Instead, it recurses further downward through that object’s children. This is the key to skipping non-functional levels in the tree. In effect, this command says: Starting from the current functional object, keep searching downward until you find the next lower functional objects, then create references to them. That is what allows the reference chain to reflect logical structure rather than every structural level. Why this is useful This approach gives you: cleaner, more readable code no manual label maintenance automatic support for one-or-many references a functional map of the model rather than just a physical tree better reuse of machines, cells, and factory-level groupings Instead of writing search logic, you can work with meaningful chains such as: current.printerCell.rewinder.turret Best practices Use role-based names Set functionname based on what the object does, not its instance name. Good examples: printerCell rewinder turret infeedQueue Less useful examples: object1 machineA testNode Be consistent across models If you reuse systems or templates, keep the same functionname values so code remains portable. Add functionname only where it adds value Not every object needs one. Use it on objects you want to reference directly in logic. Include fixed resources too Do not treat this as a container-only feature. Fixed resources such as processors, sources, queues, and sinks can also participate and often should as these will be the objects your want to setup, load or listen to. Use systemContainer deliberately Mark the objects that represent meaningful system roots. That may be a machine, a cell, a line, or a factory-level grouping. Expect arrays when a role repeats If multiple objects with the same function appear under the same functional parent, that reference will become an array. Keep the hierarchy meaningful Since this works purely from tree structure, the physical organization of the tree should support the logical organization of the model. Use it to remove search logic If you find yourself repeatedly searching for the same kind of object, that is often a sign that it should have a functionname. Summary This approach turns the model hierarchy into a self-maintaining functional reference map. By assigning functionname labels to meaningful objects and rebuilding relationships during reset with containerReset(current), the model can automatically expose useful object references without manual wiring. That works whether the model represents a single complex machine or a larger factory made up of linked but physically distinct cells. The result is cleaner code, easier maintenance, and a more consistent way to navigate hierarchical models.
View full article
The FlexSim Application Models is a collection of example models, techniques, and reusable solutions from the FlexSim Knowledge Base. 
View full article
This article lists off application models of AGV / AMR & Navigation Logic: AGV Systems, Visualizations and Analysis, Advanced AGV Behavior, GIS.
View full article
This article lists off application models of Material Handling: Material Handling Systems, Logistics & Supply Chain
View full article
This article lists off application models of Warehouse examples: Warehouse Systems, Order Fulfillment and Logistics, Logistics and Supply Chain.
View full article
This article lists off application models of Process & Utility Examples: Visualization, Utility and Specialized Tools, Process Flow Logic.
View full article
This article lists off application models of Statistic Examples: Custom Statistic Collectors, Custom Performance Measures, Visualization of Metric in Model view, Other
View full article
This article lists off application models of Optimization, AI, ML & Python Integration: Machine Learning, Optimization Models, Experimentation and Distribution Computing, Data Integration and Messaging, Python.
View full article
This article lists off application models of conveyor systems: Conveyor System Types and Applications, Routing and Sorting Systems, and Packaging and Item Handling
View full article
This article lists off application models for Module, Integration, & Library Examples: Modules, Integration and Development
View full article
This article lists off application models of Healthcare: Patient Flow Behavior, Facility and Resource Constraints, and Reference and Learning Models
View full article
This article lists off application models of Games and VR: Games, VR and Visualizations
View full article
Missed the FlexSim Summit or want to revisit your favorite sessions? The recordings are now available to watch on demand.   The summit featured presentations from FlexSim users, partners, and Autodesk experts covering a wide range of topics—from manufacturing and healthcare simulation to AMR fleets, system design, and the latest FlexSim product updates.   You can explore all the sessions here: https://www.autodesk.com/campaigns/flexsim-summit/overview   Highlights include: FlexSim product roadmap and developer Q&A Real-world customer case studies Advanced simulation applications and workflows What’s new in FlexSim Take a look and continue the conversation with the FlexSim community!
View full article
Top Contributors