There should be a way to edit the CopyDesign rule sets during a copy process via API. Gladly as pre/post/restriction Show More

Hello, there are a few very important information which are needed on drawings when vault revision tables are used. These information are: - ECO number - revision number / letter (depends on the used scheme) - the date of the ECO - Name of the user who is going to implement the needed change   All information are filled automatically except the most important information, the ECO number.   So my idea is to get acces to the ECO-number for the vault revision table.   My customers are wandering why they have to add the ECO number by hand but everything else is automated. This change could be a very useful quality of work improvement.   Kind regards. Show More

I'd like to see the total amount of objects shown in a particular folder via Thin Client. Show More

The Query Builder is a useful tool to search for files. It would be great if the configuration of the fields to search can also be part of the distributed searches/settings.   Right now what seems to work is to copy the "Displayed Properties" in the  "C:\Users\<username>\AppData\Roaming\Autodesk\Autodesk Vault Professional 2024\Servers\<servername>\Vaults\<vaultname>\History\QuickFindHistory-IExplorerObject.xml" file, but it is a manual process.   Show More

Hi everybody, if the Thin Client option is set to disable the display of items, I'd like the “item” tab not to be displayed in the file area either. The same behavior is required for an ECO Show More

I spoke to Autodesk Support already about it and they suggested I should submit it here.   In the vault we have projects that are confidential where the files and folders are hidden from users who are not authorized. When confidential files are deleted, they end up in the Trash Bin and to unauthorized users, these appear as "Inaccessible".   But the problem is, unauthorized users can STILL restore these files form the Trash Bin. This does not make sense, why would unauthorized users be able to see these files in the Trash Bin in the first place? Every users must have the restore permission, in case they need to restore files they deleted. (withtin 30 days).   Can you add a filter which hides inaccessible files from users who are unauthorized in the first place. Show More

Select the model in the Forge Viewer (Vault) and right-click to view the document or article.   Im Forge Viewer (Vault) Modell auswählen und mit der rechten Maustaste kann dann das Dokument oder Artikel aufgerufen werden. Show More

Functionality:   Provide a user-friendly environment with no Powershell scripting to relate numbering schemes with cascading properties and discrete visibility to specific categories.   Autodesk example that exists today:   Look at the ACC solution. You can easily create a properties using any definition you want, attach it to a numbering scheme. The numbering scheme is not limited to 10 fields, it can be longer to fulfil international standards. Once user selects the file name from picklist, the properties are automictically populated according to selection. You can easily map the numbering scheme to specific folders by "tick box" process where applies, hence discrete list is offered to end-user - same concept can be adopted for categories.   No powershell required, easy adoption and agile to suit projects and product delivery.     Show More

Hello VAULT team,   at the moment it is possible to customize the output file names of PDF files created with the Job Processor by modifying the Job Processor configuration file JobProcessor.exe.config. The naming convention defined in the config file is valid for all files in the vault. (see picture "VAULT-1" and "VAULT-3")   However, in different projects we need different definitions for the naming conventions for the created PDF files. It would therefore be important to be able to define multiple name definitions in the config file. The application of the appropriate naming convention should be based on the file category of the file from which the PDF is to be created.  (see picture VAULT-2)   For each project, we create a project-specific file category and use it to assign the appropriate life cycle and revision scheme to the files. Using this project-specific file category, the job processor could recognize which naming convention it should use to create the PDF file.   It would be great if these configuration options were added quickly. Thanl you. Show More

It would be very helpful if we could select the design views and positions in Vault Viewer. They can be included in the dwfx already. The viewer within thin client is a great tool, this would be a much needed addition.   Show More

We have two different work flows, one for standard parts that are highly controlled and one for custom parts that are usually only used once for a job then not changed again but reused of future projects.  The problem we are having is that we do not want the people who are working on custom parts to have access to any standard parts that are currently in work in progress (WIP).   Sometimes parts that are WIP are actually in some larger assemblies and if a user does a "get" of that larger assembly and its children, they will get the WIP version of those parts.  I can deny downloading for them on WIP parts but the problem with that is that vault does not know to go back the most recent version that that user does have permission to download.  What vault does is looks in the user's working folder and deletes that file (if it exists in their working folder) and tries to download the most recent version but the permissions denies the download, so then there is a missing part from the upper level assembly.    There also is not a way to download a previous version manually because the most recent revision is work in progress.   I could also prevent them from seeing WIP parts but Vault hides all revisions not just the work in progress revision.      There needs to be a way for users to be able to download the most recent "released" version of files, not just the most recent.   Show More

Please bring back the posibility to sort the saved shortcuts in Vault.  Show More

Feature for an easy button to roll back revs for Administrators Show More

Hello.   It would be great to have a possibility to change Vault Thin Client Time Format. Currently it is in 12H format and cannot be changed to 24H. Regional settings do not change the time settings in Vault Thin Client.       Best regards, Rene Repina   Show More

User wants a selection to user defined Vault Properties at the Job Queue. Show More

When using Copy Design in Vault to copy a file with an higher Revision, the target files are non-compliant when the Revision Vault property of the source file is mapped to a file property. Synchronizing the property manually is an unnecessary step that should happen automatically. Please add the option to synchronize properties automatically. Show More

During the upgrade to Vault Professional 2026, the pre-check tool fails when IIS is configured with valid HTTPS bindings and an SSL certificate — even when everything is functioning correctly and accessible over HTTPS. Problem Observed: The installer attempts to access the file: http://localhost:443/TestASP/TestASPNetStatic.txt This is an invalid use of port 443, which is reserved for HTTPS. This causes a false failure in the pre-check step "Checking ASP Status", even though: IIS bindings are correctly set to "All Unassigned" HTTPS is enabled and working The certificate is valid and trusted under its assigned domain Root Cause: The pre-check tool is hardcoded to test localhost over HTTP, even when SSL is enabled. It does not validate or accept HTTPS responses, nor does it adapt to hostname + certificate logic. Users must resort to a workaround: temporarily removing HTTPS bindings from IIS to pass the installer check, which introduces risk and adds unnecessary steps. Recommendation: Update the Vault installer logic to support and properly verify HTTPS bindings. Adjust the ASP test to use the correct URL scheme: https://<server-FQDN>/TestASP/TestASPNetStatic.txt Ensure the pre-check respects: IIS bindings using "All Unassigned" SSL certificates matching the FQDN or SAN Functional HTTPS responses (including from internal or self-signed certificates) Benefit: This improvement would streamline enterprise deployments, eliminate unnecessary workarounds, and align Vault installation workflows with modern IT and security standards. Show More

Autodesk Vault Professional - BOM Row Property Behavior Feedback Subject: Usability Concern: Non-Mapped BOM Row Property Propagation To: Autodesk Vault Product Development Team We are experiencing unexpected propagation with non-mapped BOM Row Properties in Autodesk Vault Professional. Problem: When a BOM Row Property (e.g., "Specific_Attribute") on a "grandchild" component (C) is modified within the BOM of a "grandparent" item (A) – where C is nested under a "parent" item (B) – the modification propagates. Instead of remaining unique to A's BOM, the change is applied to B's internal BOM definition. Consequently, if B is used in other "grandparent" BOMs (A'), they also reflect this unintended change. Example: Modifying Specific_Attribute for C in A's BOM leads to B's internal BOM being updated. This change then appears in A''s BOM, if A' also uses B. Impact: This behavior significantly limits our ability to manage item variations specific to a higher-level assembly without duplicating "parent" items. It increases complexity and can lead to data management challenges. Request: We request a mechanism to define and modify BOM Row Properties that are truly unique to the specific instance within the highest-level BOM, without altering the master BOM definition of intermediate sub-assemblies. This would greatly enhance flexibility and usability for complex product data. Show More

Can we please have the ability to add "File Link State" as a property column to export to CSV?     Show More