Raster printing is Not Great. I think most of us want the following upgrades to raster printing:
1) Vector printing should handle more features. Depth cueing and shadows are the two biggest pain points for most users.
2) When raster printing must be used, the embedded image should be higher quality. Revit internal PDF export is the worst, creating fuzzy JPG embeds. Printing to PDF through Bluebeam creates higher quality embedded images, but it's still a fuzzy mess.
3) Hybrid raster-vector printing. Render as much as possible through vector graphics, then use a raster underlay for what cannot be done through vector.
4) Raster printing always prints WYSIWYG, but vector printing has quirky behavior occasionally.
Perhaps this will all be fixed (wiped away like a bad dream) when the new rendering engine is stable, mature, and ships to replace the current rendering engine.
---
The below links are all threads about raster printing. While these threads are not necessarily all about identical issues, and some threads contain nuances not captured in my summary above, these are all threads complaining about raster printing. This thread exists to rally together all past votes and make the complaints easier to see.
https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/vector-printing-with-raster-underlay/idi-p/7565402
https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/vector-shadows-in-hidden-line-prints/idi-p/6330690
https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/wysiwyg-amp-vector-printing/idi-p/7085229
https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-ideas/vector-option-for-export-to-pdf/idi-p/12764115
Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.