. Show More

It would be interesting to export multiple STEP files from an iAssembly to avoid doing it manually. When the are hundreds of combinations, that would definitely help. Show More

1          Start Inventor drawing            text box. 2         Select  auto numbering. 3        Type in some text but it needs to contain four or more lines of text with soft returns. 4        Change the size of the text box using the grips the  indents will be lost on the output text on the drawing.       Show More

Hello,   I am new to Autodesk Inventor, but have been a using AutoCAD for over twenty years.   One AutoCAD feature, I would like brought over into Inventor, is the ability to Specify the Drawing Path name only, in an Inventor drawing, just like you are able to do so in AutoCAD.                   Show More

I return to the discussion already opened on the Pan and Rotation of the model with the 2D mouse. I saw that Rotation can now be assigned to the press function on the mouse wheel (Inventor 2021). It would be interesting to obtain the Pan function by pressing the left and right mouse buttons together. Thanks Show More

The "tree" in the browser gets kinda big so it would be great if "Find in browser" found and showed the part you clicked on. Currently it does not work when entering analysis   Inventor 2022 Show More

新版本的簡報方式比之前的版本好用及快速很多 現在有一個問題;請求修正或新增;我的操作模式說明如下 選取轉折元件後勾選"無系統線"及使用"系統線段";開始拉動"零件";再加入"加入/移除元件"後點選"新增系統線" 此時;會產生一組系統線.拉至所需位置後再依方向操作放置;皆會自動產生系統線.定點後;放開一個零件(帶系統線的零件); 拉另外一個零件點選"新增系統線";產生新的系統線段;再拖動零件時;則不會像第一個零件會自動產生;且每移動一次位置都需要再點選"新增系統線"增加使用者很多重複動作困擾 我操作後;發現第一階可以自動產生系統線;第二階就不行;請求協助修正或新增 附加視頻檔案   Show More

When working with model states you have to be very careful which state is currently active. Especially when copying model states there is the problem that after copying the original remains active. My suggestion: After a copy, the new model state is immediately set as active. Show More

Currently, if I want to use the Forms Picture Folder functionality, I must build that out one at a time. And I must do it all very manually...    I would like to be able to specify a folder path for the picture folder and have the form pull in all of the pictures in that folder and populate the form Picture names and links, etc., as shown in this mock up image.         Show More

Most of us are looking for increased efficiency when using the product. If Inventor recorded the keyboard inputs each session, we'd all be able to hotkey our most used keyboard keys better.    Show More

I often find when using the fillet tool for instance, I make selections of edges and then I actually want to remove all selections of edges and start again, mainly because the radius is too large or something. Currently I just have to close the windows and reopen it. I don't want to have to CTRL + Select all the current selections. It would be more efficient that I can set a hotkey to reset the selections in the window. This could apply for all the feature windows.  Show More

Thank you for the mail. Inventors are intuitive and convenient, and we know them as specialized tools. Some of the mechanical design workers who used other tools I suggest for a more improved function. In other words, I hope that it will be improved with practical work-oriented tools. Fast improvement ranking. 1. If you select a part or assembly from the assembly, you should show the name of the part or assembly right away, or you should improve the display function that can display it in the lower window like an autocad. It is not immediately visible at this time and is found in the work tree window. Other tools are basic features, but the inventor is uncomfortable. other ideas improvements 2. Requesting additional right button function to show the opposite whole of the hidden function. You don't have the ability to hide parts and then look full. I am currently writing the expression-view-all indications, but it is uncomfortable. Hide Selective Parts / All visible 3. Although the detailed level of assembly is a good function, it is not useful in practice. If you need an operator to handle options, please process options so that you can cancel them if you do not want to write and write them. 4. The mirror function of the assembly is bugged. I'm not sure, I'd like to make improvements. 5. Adding or conveniently improving the name change function. I hope to upgrade to high-end tools in a little more machinery and other areas. Thank you. Show More

I have been working with Inventor for a few years now and am quite satisfied. However, I miss a simple overview like in my former CAD programme Siemens NX. There, in the assembly environment, there was a simple display of the status of each individual component. Whether completely free, partially determined or fully determined. The state was represented by a circle:   If it is o without filling, the component has no dependencies. If it is half-filled ◑, the component has dependencies but is not fully determined. If it is completely filled ●, the component is completely defined and cannot be moved. This way you always have a quick overview of what is determined, partially determined or free. In the end, the quality of the assemblies would increase, errors would be minimised and everything would be visually more realistic.   Show More

When reverse engineering a dumb solid it is necessary to remove all fillets before taking dimensions. There can be a thousand fillets on a part. It can take a long time and lots of effort to select all fillets. The Delete Face function typically fails when fillets are selected by hand. There is no way of knowing why it failed or which faces to add or remove from the selection to make it pass.   Can you add an option to the Delete Face command to delete fillets below a certain size - allowing the user to set the size. If all fillets cannot be deleted in one go the algorithm deletes the fillets in chain links iteratively until all fillets below the set size have been deleted. Show More

Similar to these old requests: https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/inventor-forum/errors-occurred-during-update-dialog-box/m-p/5076280 https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/inventor-forum/errors-occured-during-update/m-p/3780726   Is there a way of dismissing this prompt automatically like all of the other prompts?     This happens from time to time with large assemblies when master assemblies' constraints break or other reasons. I often try to multi-task so I want to know when the assemblies load and I can continue.   Is this possible and if not can the devs add it?   Thanks. Show More

3Dモデル作成時に穴フィーチャ/プロパティ画面からねじを選択する際、左ねじを選択すると、2D図面を作成した際にその情報が反映され、LHの表記が末尾に付きます。 しかし、現状のInventorでは、ねじの等級と連動しているようで、6g/6Hなどのねじの等級だけ削除しようとすると、左ねじの表記（LH）まで消えてしまいます。そもそも、JISや製図の参考書によると、6g/6Hなどの汎用ねじに関しては、ねじの等級を省略する旨も記載されておりますし、「等級」と「左ねじかどうか」については関連のない項目であるため、等級と左ねじ表記が連動する現状のInventorの仕様は不具合であると考えます。   Show More

To go along with numerous other "Crop View" requests here, this "should" be an easy one. I'd really like to see the option of being able to rotate the default crop view rectangle/box. I see a lot of our users attempting to crop ISO views with the default rectangle/box and not getting the crop they'd prefer. Yes, some, OK, a few know that you can draw a view based sketch and use that, but why not add this function to the default?   Think how when you insert a picture into an application like PowerPoint, you are given a rotate arrow at the top where you can select the angle of rotation for the picture (see examples below)   Show More

It would be nice to be able to change the BOM structure on iPart children independently. Example: we have a "family" of wear plates that bolt to a surface of our machines. These wear plates utilize the same bolt patterns and outside dimensions. The only thing that changes is the thickness of the wear plate, material of the wear plate, and if we are required to purchase (purchased BOM) the plate or if we stock (normal BOM) the material to make the plate. This type of plate is a perfect candidate to be generated via an iPart factory. We have historically ended up creating 2 factories for the same part, 1 purchased and 1 normal. This works but the tables are separate and both would need modified if changes are required. Another issue we have recently ran across with this method is if we decide to start stocking a plate that we used to purchase we now have to remove from one iPart and add it to the other. If you have worked with iParts in a Vault environment then you know what kind of challenge this presents. This is not a good work flow. If you could look at adding this it would be awesome. Show More