Control Hatch Pattern Line Weights

Control Hatch Pattern Line Weights

Anonymous
Not applicable
75,531 Views
80 Replies
Message 1 of 81

Control Hatch Pattern Line Weights

Anonymous
Not applicable

Hello,

I found this being posted by number of people and a lot of answers marked as solutions. But they don't seem to work.

 

Hatch patterns seem to be understood as taking a default pen width 1. So While playing around for changing these hatch weights, I changed all pen 1 widths to 0.5mm, for all scales, in Manage > Settings > Additional Settings > Line Weights > Model Line Weights - Perspective Line Weights > Annotation Line Weights.

 

Nothing seems to change hatch pattern or cut surface pattern line weights. Could any sage help?

Accepted solutions (4)
75,532 Views
80 Replies
Replies (80)
Message 61 of 81

scott.mackenzieG4RJ9
Explorer
Explorer

Based on what I discovered (in Revit 2022), the line weight of a fill pattern assigned to a material, such as a 2x2 fill pattern, is hard coded to use line weight #2.  Decrease the thickness of #2 for the scale you want, and the line weight of the pattern will change accordingly.

Message 62 of 81

RevitRx
Advocate
Advocate

Over 5 years later and this still isn't a feature, let's go Autodesk!!!!!

 

Revit Model Projection Hatch Pattern Override Missing.png

www.RevitRx.com

Did this resolve your issue? Please accept it "As a Solution" so others may benefit from it.
Message 63 of 81

RobDraw
Mentor
Mentor

Try Product Feedback or the IDEAS forum if you want Autodesk to hear you. 


Rob

Drafting is a breeze and Revit doesn't always work the way you think it should.
0 Likes
Message 64 of 81

piman_at_kt
Community Visitor
Community Visitor

How do I change the line thickness?
thank you

0 Likes
Message 65 of 81

scott.mackenzieG4RJ9
Explorer
Explorer

...it's pen #2

0 Likes
Message 66 of 81

jacquesXE8FU
Explorer
Explorer

As far as I am aware, hatch patterns line weights in Revit all uses line style #1 by default. The only way to change hatch pattern line thickness is to change your line style #1 thickness for each scale and all hatches will update with this change.

This means that line style 1 should always be reserved for this use and any customization to your templates should commence from line style 2.

There is unfortunately no way to change individual hatch pattern line weights at this time.

0 Likes
Message 67 of 81

whp.m.owens
Enthusiast
Enthusiast

I know this is six or seven years too late...but I was running into an issue which was related but a bit different.

There is also some misinformation in the posts.

 

Hatch patterns has already been covered; these are very easy to change through the type settings.

 

The surface-display is controlled by the object style. This is TERRIBLE programing from Autoesk.

If you want a lighter hatch-pattern on your surfaces, you have to change the projection-pen in the global object styles.

In order to get your heavier outline back, you can override the weights by category in view and/or by filter.

Obviously you can also override by element or line-weight, but no one wants to do that much work.

 

 

The section-display is controlled by the lineweights of Pen 1, and are dependent upon the scale of the view.

(In my office, Pen 1 is reserved only for hatches and very fine detail lines.)

 

whpmowens_1-1692705815218.png

 

whpmowens_2-1692705923347.png

 

 

EDIT 1 Jan 2025

I have been running into this problem again in Revit; pretty sure Autodesk changed how hatch-weight behave. 😞

 

 

Revit 2023

I believe Autodesk has changed how Line-Weights are assigned to hatch patterns in this version. Previously, pen 1 was used for all hatch patterns.

At some point, the hatch-patterns are now assigne via the Projection-Pen in the Object styles.

This is fine if you are using a very siimple 1, 2, 3 pen-designation for fine, medium and thick lines. I am not.

I use 1 for hatches and very fine detail lines, 2 for a reduced projection-line, 3 as a primary projection line, 4 as a reduced cut-line and 5 as a normal cut-line.

My standard settings until this point was basically to assign 5 the cut-lines of all structural elements and 3 to the projection. Doing that gets me a very thick hatch line.

 

The only way to solve this is to set the projection lines to 1 in the object styles and to override the project-lines in my view templates.

A pain, but it works.

 

Revit 2024

Information will be added once I check it.

 

Message 68 of 81

semi
Collaborator
Collaborator

Has anyone checked if transparant walls in structure discipline doesn't show hatch patterns in Revit 2024?

See this: https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-structure-forum/hatch-pattern-missing-in-revit-2024/td-p/121745...

0 Likes
Message 69 of 81

CADastrophic
Explorer
Explorer

Wow, thanks mate you just made my day. This works perfectly!

 

Controlling line weights/visuals of anything is such a convoluted mess to me. Yes, I'm pretty new to Revit, but this whole hierachy thing in x different menus is just madness. Why isn't this consolidated somewhere? With my limited experience I would still assume that controlling this with filters would be a great solution 99% of times. Just needs to be setup once and would be easy to understand.

But maybe I'm just clueless and missing the bigger picture here...

0 Likes
Message 70 of 81

whp.m.owens
Enthusiast
Enthusiast

The heirarchy is pretty logical and allows you to change things from the macro to micro levels.

When you set a template up, you generally start with the global-settings and work your way down until you get to localized views. After that, users will be required to make adjustments based on project-specific issues.

 

But I agree, some of the settings are poorly documented, and even changing without notice.

0 Likes
Message 71 of 81

Lance.Coffey
Autodesk Support
Autodesk Support

Here is a Revit Idea on this topic (vote this up if you would like to see this feature implemented): Lineweight for hatch/fill patterns



Lance Coffey

Technical Support Specialist
0 Likes
Message 72 of 81

jens.lathouwersMR29R
Contributor
Contributor

I have read the whole thread and still didn't see a post that's clear and to the point. So I'm hoping to not just add another of those posts to the list, but here's my best shot:

 

There's two 'sorts' of patterns discussed here: 

1. filled region pattterns

2. Patterns used in materials

 

Filled patterns are not what OP is after, but these do just have a parameter where you can set the line weight. 

 

jenslathouwersMR29R_0-1743158836937.png

 

 

For Patterns used in materials:

 

In most cases Revit uses line weight [1] for patterns used in Materials. There's one exception, and that's Ceilings. For ceilings the patterns are driven by line weight [2]

 

jenslathouwersMR29R_1-1743159213125.png

 

 

That's why in Templates we usually keep [1] and [2] just for the patterns, and start at [3] with the thinnest linestyle we want to use for anything but Patterns.

 

 

Message 73 of 81

carlPAW5H
Participant
Participant

carlPAW5H_0-1755158993693.png


Revit 2025. This wall selected (blue) is not being cut, so I did a manual override of the hatch and now I have these THICK hatch lines...it makes no sense...

carlPAW5H_1-1755159169238.png


Obviously no linework setting for fill patterns, just fill regions. What is controlling this hatch lineweight?????????????

carlPAW5H_2-1755159412979.png
Help!

How is this software still coded so terribly in 2025 when a free AI can literally code me a BIM software from scratch in a day.

Help.

Revit is like game developers selling their early access games for full price. We are not your guineapigs @ (*edit) $3000 USD per license per year.

I digress.

0 Likes
Message 74 of 81

RSomppi
Mentor
Mentor

@carlPAW5H wrote:

Help!

How is this software still coded so terribly in 2025 when a free AI can literally code me a BIM software from scratch in a day.

Help.

Revit is like game developers selling their early access games for full price. We are not your guineapigs @ $300 USD per license per year.


Sorry. Can't help you.

 

$300/yr us a great deal. Is this from an official source and why aren't you using the free AI generated one?

Message 75 of 81

jens.lathouwersMR29R
Contributor
Contributor

Are you able to share the model? If so, it'll be easier to find the culprit.

0 Likes
Message 76 of 81

carlPAW5H
Participant
Participant

Apologies, I meant $3000!! $300 would be an amazing deal indeed! And regarding the AI example, it was hyperbole, but it is still physically possible to code an entire software in a day using AI, it just wanted to make a point. And the frustration is because the entire industry's consensus is that Autodesk are monopolistic extortionists. They have no excuse in the year 2025 for not having some of the basic core features other softwares have had for decades.

0 Likes
Message 77 of 81

carlPAW5H
Participant
Participant

So I found the culprit.

carlPAW5H_0-1755180505212.png

This "umbrella" line-weight seems to control hatch region line weights on all walls that do not fall within any of the other defined categories below. I don't know 100% how this line weight works but it fixed the problem for me.

Good luck others.

Message 78 of 81

jens.lathouwersMR29R
Contributor
Contributor

Ah, I see — that’s just the object styles, so that’s the first lineweight to check. It’s actually a basic piece of functionality in the software. Glad you found it!

There are definitely many areas where Revit could improve, but in this case, it’s just working as intended.

0 Likes
Message 79 of 81

JDA_Joe
Explorer
Explorer
[https://res.public.onecdn.static.microsoft/assets/mail/file-icon/png/generic_16x16.png]Ariola Structural R23_detached.rvt<>

Thanks for responding. It has been a long time since this post, but this is the model. I have since switched to using solid grey hatching for concrete cut patterns. There are times when the pattern is darker or lighter, I believe depending on if there are overlapping beams.

This a structural model. I have had to do all kinds of linework to get things to look right. Concrete beams should be hidden lines, but often they need to be overridden to get it right.

My original post is below:

[cid:f6f59d12-8a5d-4325-a463-73f60710f6d1]
0 Likes
Message 80 of 81

carlPAW5H
Participant
Participant

The solution was so easy. You couldn't help them either. Why even reply to this forum? You are wasting your time and everyone else's.

 

@carlPAW5H - this post has been edited due to Community Rules & Etiquette violation.

0 Likes