В приложении Autodesk Inventor Professional добавьте пожалуйста новую функцию для конструирования транспортных средств с помощью текстового запроса волшебного искусственного интеллекта Show More

I was missing the ability in Autodesk Inventor to ground or fix all sketch entities when there are already a few of them constraint or via either geometric constraints or dimensional constraints. In this case the Inventor default command will give an error, when selecting the sketch entities via window selection.   With this add in and the command “Fix Constraint Plus +” this is now no issue anymore.   Maybe this is a good addition for future releases of Autodesk Inventor.   Show More

This feature is very handy, letting you sweep a plane perpendicularly across a path to a desired distance or target point.   The absence of a similar feature in Inventor is a bit annoying Show More

We totally understand the purpose and intent behind floating windows but there is one glaring problem.  It's very easy to quickly drag ALL your windows out of the main screen with one accidental mouse click and drag.  But to return them to the main screen, you have to drag them one at a time.  I am currently working on two sub-assemblies on a full machine, about a dozen parts and drawings, some sub-assemblies, have around two dozen tabs.  One little accidental drag click and they're ALL out of the main window.  Then a long time clicking each floating tab one at a time, dragging it back to the tab bar in the main window, then figuring out what order my tabs were in as I structure my tabs so drawings are beside parts, presentation files are beside assemblies which are beside drawings.     Either give us a way to disable floating windows, or give us a way to drag them ALL back as easily as we can drag them away. Show More

Just went to use the finish command for the first time, running it from an assembly, toggled on body selection and tried selecting the welds in my weldment assembly. Didn't work. I can select each weld face using the face selection, but that's too cumbersome for the amount of welds i have.   Please enable the selection of weld bodies in finish command. Show More

When opening files, placing components, or inserting Content Center parts in Autodesk Inventor, the file browser always opens in a specific directory. Navigating to frequently used subfolders within a project often requires repeatedly clicking through the same folder structure. While Inventor already offers folder shortcuts, they are not very efficient in practice because they are displayed in a hierarchical tree that requires expanding multiple dropdowns before reaching the desired location. In large projects with many nested directories, this results in unnecessary clicks and slower workflows. Proposed Solution Add a "Recent Folders" section to the left side of the file browser, similar to the navigation panels found in Windows Explorer and many other professional applications. The panel could automatically display: Recently accessed folders Frequently used folders Pinned favorite folders This functionality should be available in all file browser dialogs, including: Open File Place Component Place from Content Center Import dialogs Any other file selection windows Benefits Faster navigation within project structures Reduced number of clicks Improved user experience More efficient handling of large assemblies and projects Consistent behavior with modern file management interfaces Use Case When working on a machine consisting of hundreds of components organized in multiple subfolders, users often switch repeatedly between the same directories (e.g., Frame, Purchased Parts, Pneumatics, Electrical, Drawings). Instead of navigating through the entire folder hierarchy each time, users could simply select the required directory from the Recent Folders panel and continue working immediately. Expected Impact A small UI enhancement that could save countless clicks every day and significantly improve workflow efficiency for Inventor users working with large and complex project structures. Show More

Currently, when hovering over the endpoint of a line, the center of a circle, or any point in geometry with a coincident constraint applied, the glyph is the target when dragging. If you don't have the "display coincident constraints" setting on, the glyph snaps back into place afterward, accomplishing nothing. This is extremely annoying, as to actually drag the point, you have to either: Hide the constraints using the ribbon at the bottom of the screen, then unhide them afterward. Press Fn and then F7, then press Fn and F8 afterward, which either requires two hands or is an uncomfortable stretch. (Assuming you have function lock set to make the volume and media controls easy to press, which I think most people do) Very carefully align your cursor in the small area away from the point where it chooses to select the point and not the glyph.   Solution 1: The only two interactions with coincident glyphs require you to left-click or right-click on them first and do not involve dragging, so clicking and dragging should prioritize the point (unless your cursor is explicitly over the glyph if the "display coincident constraints" setting is on)   Solution 2: The glyphs are massive and would be easy to click on without this interaction working as it currently does. Interacting with the glyph should require you to hover over the glyph, rather than the point it's associated with.   I think the first solution is the most seamless, but to not upset any users, make this a global preference you can turn on (I argue it should be on by default, as it's only possibly an annoyance if you manually set the "display coincident constraints" setting on) As it stands, dragging points with the coincident constraint makes me want to pull my hair out.   Show More

Hi, I use perspective view about 90% of the time when modelling, and I run into the problem of viewport clipping quite a lot. I find it strange how Autodesk has a solution to this in 3DS Max, but the same fix doesn't exist in Inventor. Is it possible to implement it please? Show More

Comming from SW years ago, I'm still missing an option to skip modifying all application settings and just importing for example only file paths. Users prefer to make their own adjustments for how the software responds, and right now it's all or nothing. You will have to redo everything if anything changes on the company-defined side of things, or have to adjust al those paths manually. Split the export and import for example to each specific tab. Include EVERYTHING, so also custom color schemes etc. and move the iLogic settings also in there. (And move it to application settings instead of some half hidden seperate menu?!)  It should be easy to roll out settings and to pick what to import and what not.      Show More

I would like to suggest an option to center-align the Inventor ribbon tabs and menus, similar to the centered taskbar available in Windows 11. For users working on ultra-wide and super ultra-wide monitors, the current left-aligned ribbon layout forces frequently used commands and tabs to remain far from the center of the screen, where most modeling activity takes place. This increases mouse travel distance and can make the interface feel less ergonomic during long design sessions. A user-selectable option to center the ribbon tabs and command area would provide several benefits: Improved ergonomics on ultra-wide displays Reduced mouse movement between the graphics window and ribbon commands Better visual balance of the user interface A more modern and customizable workspace experience Ideally, this could be implemented as a simple setting allowing users to choose between: Left-aligned ribbon (current behavior) Center-aligned ribbon As ultra-wide monitors become increasingly common in engineering and CAD environments, this small UI enhancement could significantly improve daily usability for many Inventor users. Thank you for considering this idea. Show More

When working with 3D Annotations (MBD/PMI) in Inventor, it is common to move dimension text or annotations to improve readability during model review. However, once an annotation has been moved, there is currently no command to restore it to its default automatically calculated position. It would be very useful to have a command such as "Reset Annotation Position" or "Restore Default Position", available for: a single selected annotation; multiple selected annotations; all annotations in an annotation view. This feature would: save time when reorganizing annotations; eliminate the need to delete and recreate dimensions; provide functionality consistent with other CAD systems that allow restoring the default placement of annotation text. This would significantly improve the workflow for Model-Based Definition (MBD), especially on complex parts with many 3D annotations. Show More

I suggest that selecting objects work similarly to how it does in AutoCAD—by that I mean that when I select objects while scrolling the view (zooming in or out), the selection window remains in the same position. Another issue is when I want to select objects using the “selection frame.” When I hold down Ctrl, Inventor selects the plane I’ve hovered over with the cursor, which shouldn’t happen in this situation. Best regards Show More

When copying identical parts or assemblies using drag and drop from the browser within an assembly why not be able to select some of the constraints also. I spend a lot of time putting identical parts into an assembly and I need one of the three mate constraints to remain but I have to re-mate this every time. Show More

Hi, I have some cool ideas  1) When we create a coil shape we can have more parameters, the first and second parameters are outer diameter and inner diameter or thickness to have a tube directly without an extra steps. When the inner diameter or thickness is equal to zero the tube will be a solid. The third parameter is the geometric shape, we can pick an existing shape. The fourth is angle deviation of shape and can define each angle for each axis. 2) To have a coil we have three parameters pitch, revolution and height, we can drive the pitch by an equation.  3) In Sweep command we can have coil spring and we must put an integer for revolution my suggestion why we don't introduce pitch also and can be drive by an equation and we don,t need a perfect loop and this necessary for some geometry like Rodin coil designing. 4) When we do an extrusion we have usually a perpendicular solid, we can have direction of extrusion, it's very useful option. 5) Why we don't have the option to cloning part not only along a path but an 3 D array cloning like 3DS max? 6) We pant have a parametric modeling it open horizon for Inventor. 7) Supporting more file cad like svg, ai and ect. 8) perform and fixing the dwg plugin in import. Think you.    Show More

When parts are bolted together, a clearance hole in one part must face a compatible tapped hole in the mating part. Inventor has no built-in way to verify this, so mistakes are only caught during manufacturing or assembly. Examples that go undetected today: A Ø6.5 clearance hole facing an M8 tapped hole (screw won't fit). A clearance hole too large for the thread it faces. Two tapped holes of different metric sizes facing each other. A counterbore/countersink too shallow or too narrow for the screw head. Two clearance holes facing each other with no thread on the axis (likely missing a thread). All the geometry needed to detect these is already in the model. Proposed idea A model-check that scans an assembly for coaxial hole pairs between different parts that are incoherent, with ERROR/WARNING severity, configurable tolerances (face separation, axis offset, ISO 273 clearance), and click-to-highlight in the 3D view. Like interference checking, but aware of hole intent (clearance vs. tapped) rather than just solid geometry. Related API gap While prototyping this as an iLogic rule, HoleFeature.ThreadInfo returns Nothing and ThreadDesignation comes back empty (Inventor 2023), so an add-in can't read a hole's thread designation and must reverse-engineer the nominal from the modeled minor diameter. Please expose this metadata reliably through the API. I have a working iLogic prototype confirming this is feasible from existing model data — a native implementation would benefit anyone assembling fastened parts. Show More

  Inventor does not allow model annotations (PMI) to be inherited or reused when a part is created using Derive. This is a limitation for top‑down and skeleton‑based workflows, where geometry is intentionally split across multiple parts. Typical structure: • Skeleton part (layout, parameters) • Design part (solid geometry derived from skeleton) • Manufacturing or simplified part (derived again)   Today, PMI must be recreated and cannot follow the geometry into downstream derived parts. This breaks Model‑Based Definition workflows and forces drawing workarounds (overlay views, duplicate annotations, or referencing upstream models).   ---   Requested Enhancement Provide an option to: • Include PMI when deriving a part, or • Reference upstream PMI in derived parts (associative or read‑only) Similar to how parameters and work features are handled.   ---   Why This Matters • Skeleton modeling is a recommended Inventor practice • PMI is central to MBD and drawing reduction • Current behavior causes duplicated work and poor associativity Supporting PMI reuse in derived parts would significantly improve MBD adoption and top‑down design workflows. Show More

When making a mid plane between two planes, I think it would be a great idea to have a drop down to insert more than one mid plane equally spaced. Show More

We work in soft metric, inch materials and dimensions on drawings, but metric fasteners.  Often when we are sketching while editing a part, we manually enter/override the dimension of something in an alternate unit than the part settings.  For example, I am making small slot for a metric part, I locate where I want it, then draw the slot, then override the slot diameter with "5mm" (or "5MM", thank you Autodesk!!!!!).     But when it shows the dimension in the sketch, it shows ".197".  Would be really nice if, when you enter a dimension MANUALLY, the sketch shows the overridden value in the units that it was manually entered as.  If I double click on the dimension, the edit box pops up with "5mm" so it knows what it is, but it should show "5mm" in the sketch when not editing it.  Looking at the sketch you don't know what dimensions were entered as an alternate unit dimension.   Show More

1. Different access list if you want too export  "Revit Catergory"   from   Revit  rvt  or   Revit (rfa)  Family     rfa have no Catergory  "Pipes" or Walls   in export rfa            2. Informed design have on  Revit Category          Show More