Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
Show only
|
Search instead for
Did you mean:
This page has been translated for your convenience with an automatic translation service. This is not an official translation and may contain errors and inaccurate translations. Autodesk does not warrant, either expressly or implied, the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the information translated by the machine translation service and will not be liable for damages or losses caused by the trust placed in the translation service.Translate
Isn't it time to devise something a little more modern for patterns? Hard to believe that the 35 year-old PAT file format is still the "technology" of choice for this. Would love to see a modern pattern creator that could do any kind of pattern. Including: rectilinear, random, and especially radial. It is just silly that we have to use model lines and arrays or material hacks to simple brick arches or radial floor patterns.
Many architects use brick patterns in their designs but Revit does not have enough patterns and if you want to add patterns it should import from Autocad they are limited, so I think Revit should have a part to create special hatches based on our ideas.
Hallo, immer wieder verfolgt mich das gleiche Problem mit den Schraffuren und Linienstile. Gerade
wenn es um die Detailplanung geht, vermisse ich einige Funktionen und Darstellungen wie z. B.
Abdichtungsbahnen, Dampfsperre, Unterspannbahnen und alle anderen dazugehörigen Gruppen. Zwar gibt es die Funktion, es als Familie einzufügen, aber die Anwendung erschwert sich im Detail, weshalb ich mir mit Linien und Schraffuren aushelfe.
Dies sollte in einem Architektenprogramm nicht der Fall sein und vor eingestellt zur Verfügung stehen! Des Weiteren
nshe ich ein Problem bei den Schraffuren. Mann kann nur schwer neue erstellen und wenn man vorhandene ändern will, ändern sich die gleichen Gruppen mit, obwohl man die Schraffur dupliziert hat. Zudem sollte sich das Spektrum
der Auswahlmöglichkeiten erweitern.
Somit wäre es super, wenn in Zukunft die gängistn Linien, Schraffuren und Musterlinien schon
The drafting hatch pattern is one of the most commonly used tools in Revit, was already outdated when Revit was bought by Autodesk, and remains unchanged decades later barely useable, despite many acknowledgements in the forum on their massive shortcomings. 1. Users should have the ability to tab and shift to select the drafted material to move and rotate it relative to its host object, be it model cut display, model projection display, detail component, or filled region.
2. When nested in a detail component, the drafting hatch should have two options to align with the host or align with the sheet.
4. Hatch thickness applied to an object should be controllable, so CMU walls can be bolder than other walls, and not hard set to LW1...or LW2 (why ceiling hatches, why?).
5. The patterns set in a detail component should be independent of the project versions in the same way hatches are, so that the pattern doesn't switch if there's already a pattern with that name in the project. 6. Drafting hatches should have solid areas, so you could make a checker pattern or Fire Rated hatch in a wall display that doesn't melt a PDF printer with thousands of lines to simulate a solid block. 7. Custom patterns shouldn't require a 3rd party tool or esoteric text doc to make but should have a simple editor with a graphic interface, like a $3000/year per seat software should reasonably have.
Revit 2024, still failing at hatches...Autodesk what are you doing? Take whoever is in charge of making "Liker" badgers or colorizing API plug-ins and get them to work on the basic functions of making construction documents.
I've started creating support cases for things that Revit is lacking. I suggest we all start doing this instead of creating/voting ideas. Flood their support with stuff they should have implemented/fixed years ago.
