Announcements
Welcome to the Revit Ideas Board! Before posting, please read the helpful tips here. Thank you for your Ideas!
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Determine Pipe Flange use by Family instead of Pipe Type

Determine Pipe Flange use by Family instead of Pipe Type

Reposting on behalf of @SeckJ :

 

I've never agreed with the way Revit determines whether or not to place a flange (currently done in the Pipe Type Routing Preferences).  If you are modeling a flanged piping system, it works fine because you will have a flange and each fitting/valve.  However, if you are modeling a system with multiple connection types, it becomes difficult.  For example, I recently modeled an aeration piping system that was primarily welded stainless steel. However, at each inline valve, flanges had to be placed at both sides of the valves.  Since the majority of connection points were welded, I set the Flanges to  <None> in the Routing Preferences.  Therefore, at each valve, I had to pull back the pipe away from the valve, place a flange on the end of the pipe, and then drag the flange back to the valve to connect.

 

My idea is to move the Flange settings to the Pipe Accessory and Fitting family categories and remove it from the Routing Preferences.  For example, create a setting within the Pipe Accessory family category in which the user can select the connection type, or merely provide a "Flanged Connection" checkbox.  Then, regardless of the pipe type in which the valve/fitting will be placed, it will take on the setting within the family.  This would allow a user to easily place flanged valves in welded pipe system.  Another example of this situation is placing threaded valves in a soldered copper pipe system.

 

5 Comments
SeckJ
Enthusiast

I've never agreed with the way Revit determines whether or not to place a flange (currently done in the Pipe Type Routing Preferences).  If you are modeling a flanged piping system, it works fine because you will have a flange and each fitting/valve.  However, if you are modeling a system with multiple connection types, it becomes difficult.  For example, I recently modeled an aeration piping system that was primarily welded stainless steel. However, at each inline valve, flanges had to be placed at both sides of the valves.  Since the majority of connection points were welded, I set the Flanges to  <None> in the Routing Preferences.  Therefore, at each valve, I had to pull back the pipe away from the valve, place a flange on the end of the pipe, and then drag the flange back to the valve to connect.

 

My idea is to move the Flange settings to the Pipe Accessory and Fitting family categories and remove it from the Routing Preferences.  For example, create a setting within the Pipe Accessory family category in which the user can select the connection type, or merely provide a "Flanged Connection" checkbox.  Then, regardless of the pipe type in which the valve/fitting will be placed, it will take on the setting within the family.  This would allow a user to easily place flanged valves in welded pipe system.  Another example of this situation is placing threaded valves in a soldered copper pipe system.

Tags (3)
bowenja
Enthusiast

I totally agree with this suggestion.  I constantly having issues with flanges disappearing when trying to connect them.

Zsolt.Varga
Autodesk Support

Same wish reported in support case by customer Klaus Gölitzer.

Anonymous
Not applicable

Any luck implementing this?

rainer.bless
Enthusiast

Since I've been using Revit MEP, I've been annoyed about the routing and flange connection. As with AutoCAD MEP, the assignment of the flanges should be done in the pipe accessories family

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Submit Idea