Oh lord.. Please don't integrate EAGLE into Fusion..
Despite the pricing, which seems to be the main discussion here, I'm much more concerned about how this would f*up EAGLE.
If this is really executed, I fear that EAGLE would follow Fusions lead of forcing "features" onto the user that no professional (or basically anybody) wants, needs, or has ever asked for.
E.g. the inability to have files locally. 🙄
What's so sad about this, is that I actually love the concept of having a single software for various kinds of engineering that are somehow related.
As in electrical and mechanical engineering. It makes perfect sense.
But Fusion360 is a toy at most. The only reason I am using it, is because it is required for 3D models of EAGLE PCBs.
I don't understand why this is. Autodesk has a perfectly capable and powerful CAD software; Inventor.
Why not take that as a foundation and remove some features that are specific to mechanical engineering, while keeping the rest.
Fusion is a pain to use. gets ridiculously slow with medium sized models.
The constraints for assemblies are also a mess imho. Again; why change something that's perfectly fine.
The way I see it, Fusion360 can't be considered a professional software; rather an entry level tool for hobbyists. At least I'm not aware of anybody who uses it in a commercial environment.
On the other hand, I know a lot of people who are using EAGLE professionally.
I think, that turning these two into some unified clusterf*ck could backfire massively; if even the very essentials are lacking.
Such as the freedom to choose on whether to use cloud storage or not, or just solid performance beyond 3D models consisting of one LED, a resistor and a switch.
I'm hoping the best but expecting the worst 🤕