Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

ECO OPEN State Routing Improvement for Change Administrator Flowchart Permissions

ECO OPEN State Routing Improvement for Change Administrator Flowchart Permissions

Suggestion 1 (related image):

First I want to share a useful markup of the flowchart that explains what Engineering Change Order roles are allowed to do what... Which I suggest to have this info displayed to admin level users to help them. See images at end.

ECO flow Defined Rev 4.png

 

Suggestion 2 (related):

Second, I would like to request the Open State to have a 3rd option to allow any engineer to approve/edit from Create & Open state. Not sure how to explain this in the simplest way. So here goes. In my company, only engineers have the ability to create ECOs... But due to the way it's currently designed, if a engineer creates a ECO and saves it; They are already making changes to the files/models/drawings and b/c of this, the Change Administrator is then reached out to directly once the ECO work is already done and checked and ready to be moved on to release phases. This frankly makes the Open, Work and Check State Useless. And to top it off, b/c it was submitted to Open, they had no way to edit their ECO descriptions and fields after they found more things to note.

 

During the ECO process, the Engineers/drafters need to be able to use that description area to make notes for shop/manufacturing and shouldn't be locked out of it.

 

I'm an admin for my company. 99% of the time, I'm reviewing these ECOs and find that the descriptions are lacking b/c the user at the time just didn't have time to track down a manager (which is in a strings of meetings) to move it forward to work phase. Having the ability to give the users the power to submit ECO from Open to Work would be super helpful and expand the system's capability to work for more companies and their workflows.

Temp for Idea 1.png

2 Comments
ihayesjr
Community Manager

@Hunteil 

Thank you for posting the idea. However, you haven't explained what problem you are trying to solve with this suggestion.

Hunteil
Collaborator

@ihayesjr ,

 

Suggestion 1 is to help non-Vault-fluent admins understand what settings control the progression on the ECO. I.e. department managers become top level admins in Vault but don't understand what role controls the progression. These top level managers come and go without full training & sometimes bring along opinions w/out fully understanding the consequence. This would help prevent mistakes.

 

Suggestion 2: To allow smaller companies to adjust the settings to better match their faster workflows. This solves a few things as described in the OP. Descriptions can be filled out when in Open state and the ECO won't get stuck in limbo (open state) b/c the admins are busy elsewhere.

 

Note: Currently I could technically assign those engineers Change Administrator role to allow them to do what I suggesting. But this comes at a greater price b/c they could figure out that they can by-pass the admins doing anything. I would rather see everything from Review to Closed, be handled by the admin still.

 

I hope this is clear enough. Just let me know... Maybe I should split the 2 suggestions up into independent suggestions.

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Submit Idea  

Autodesk Design & Make Report