Composite section analysis

Composite section analysis

EY23
Enthusiast Enthusiast
1,189 Views
12 Replies
Message 1 of 13

Composite section analysis

EY23
Enthusiast
Enthusiast

Dear all, 

I'm trying to simulate an encased concrete composite section. But the analysis took much time and part of the drawn section were neglected by robot.

 

Any Ideas?

0 Likes
Accepted solutions (1)
1,190 Views
12 Replies
Replies (12)
Message 2 of 13

Artur.Kosakowski
Autodesk Support
Autodesk Support

Hi @EY23

 

Could you attach Robot file and screen captures which explain the situation?



Artur Kosakowski
0 Likes
Message 3 of 13

EY23
Enthusiast
Enthusiast

@Artur.Kosakowski Thank you for your reply.

 

Kindly find attached files

0 Likes
Message 4 of 13

Artur.Kosakowski
Autodesk Support
Autodesk Support

Hi @EY23

 

You need to redefine the section shape:

 

stress.JPG

 

If I managed to answer your question(s) press the Accept as Solution button please. This will help other users to find solution(s) much faster. Thank you.



Artur Kosakowski
0 Likes
Message 5 of 13

EY23
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
My section has 2 types of concrete..
the internal beam 14 mpa and the external 30 mpa. in ur case the concrete
type is similar
0 Likes
Message 6 of 13

Artur.Kosakowski
Autodesk Support
Autodesk Support

Hi @EY23

 

So it was what was intended but not done exactly as such Smiley Happy

 

Please change the material of the outer section as 30mpa concrete was not defined in the section you sent therefore I wasn't able to assign it. Mind that the rebars can be of slightly different diameters as well.

 

stress 1.JPG

 

If I managed to answer your question(s) press the Accept as Solution button please. This will help other users to find solution(s) much faster. Thank you.



Artur Kosakowski
0 Likes
Message 7 of 13

EY23
Enthusiast
Enthusiast

I tried it but it neglected the bottom rebars- when I cilec in the circles it shows that they are steel. but in the analysis they are neglected as if they are not moved at the top of the facesection-trial 2.png

0 Likes
Message 8 of 13

EY23
Enthusiast
Enthusiast

Dear @Artur.Kosakowski

When I transfer the section to the modulus the shear Modulus G any suggestions?Shear Modulus.png

0 Likes
Message 9 of 13

Artur.Kosakowski
Autodesk Support
Autodesk Support

Hi @EY23

 

Make sure you defined G in the material properties of 14mpa concrete material in Job Preferences before you created the section in the Section Builder module  and that the cuts are at the locations of rebars:

 

positions of cuts.JPG

If I managed to answer your question(s) press the Accept as Solution button please. This will help other users to find solution(s) much faster. Thank you.

 

If I managed to answer your question(s) press the Accept as Solution button please. This will help other users to find solution(s) much faster. Thank you.



Artur Kosakowski
0 Likes
Message 10 of 13

EY23
Enthusiast
Enthusiast

@Artur.Kosakowski thank you for your reply.

 

kindly find attached the pictures showing 3 cases.

My section is made of 3 materials:

-why the Ix and Wx are not calculated?

-G is defined for all types of concrete, why it isn't calculated in the section.

-for the same load Fz for the composite section is larger than the ordinary one the pictures shows

0 Likes
Message 11 of 13

Artur.Kosakowski
Autodesk Support
Autodesk Support

Hi @EY23

 

-why the Ix and Wx are not calculated?

These values are not calculated for the composite sections. You can enter them using the Section Browser in the User Section database based on the results obtained for the concrete section of the same shape.

 

-G is defined for all types of concrete, why it isn't calculated in the section.

As the final section properties are weighted based on E of the composite section components assigning the corresponding G value is not possible. On the other hand its influence would be only visible if you include shear in the deformation which you usually don't for ribbed slab.

 

-for the same load Fz for the composite section is larger than the ordinary one the pictures shows

As the composite beam is more rigid than the 'standard' one it 'attracts' more load from the slab. Compare the deflection of both beams.

 

If I managed to answer your question(s) press the Accept as Solution button please. This will help other users to find solution(s) much faster. Thank you.

 



Artur Kosakowski
0 Likes
Message 12 of 13

EY23
Enthusiast
Enthusiast

@Artur.Kosakowski thank you for your reply.

 

I Have also one last question. Is there any way to reduce the stiffness of the composite beam in the model in order to get more realistic results regarding deflection? (0.35 Ig for beam)

0 Likes
Message 13 of 13

Artur.Kosakowski
Autodesk Support
Autodesk Support
Accepted solution

Hi @EY23

 

The only way I can think of is to edit its Iy value in the section database.

 

If I managed to answer your question(s) press the Accept as Solution button please. This will help other users to find solution(s) much faster. Thank you.

 



Artur Kosakowski
0 Likes