Announcements
Welcome to the Revit Ideas Board! Before posting, please read the helpful tips here. Thank you for your Ideas!
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Include in SCHEDULES Families/Types NOT USED, just like Rooms and Sheets

Include in SCHEDULES Families/Types NOT USED, just like Rooms and Sheets

Schedules are certainly one of the most powerful benefits of Revit, as they allow a level of management with a holistic perspective that allows us to focus on consistency. But there remains a gap in this purpose: those model families and types which are not in use

 

There's no need to imagine how to do it, or how to turn them on/off, the best way is the known one, and we already have two examples quite useful to imitate: the unplaced rooms or sheets. So it would be as easy as powerful to have the same three icons (Show/Hide/Isolate), to manage those model and loadable families which are still not used in the actual project or, even more, including linked files

6 Comments
Mark_Engwirda
Collaborator

@jordicunillperea Could you elaborate on what you would use this for, Are you suggesting that we could delete unused family types via schedules?

jordicunillperea
Enthusiast

hi Mark,

 

it's just for managing information and families/types data, but with a full scope.  Sometimes we need to fill keynotes, assembly codes, type marks and some other custom parameters in a file that's still work in progress, which means that there may be some families/types out of the schedules that may appear after doing that task

 

is it a common task or is it a rare one?

Mark_Engwirda
Collaborator

@jordicunillperea  Thanks for letting me know

Plenty of early votes, not many comments.

Sean_Page
Collaborator

Gotta say, this one confuses me.

Schedules aren't showing Families or Types, they are showing Instances (Created Elements) of those Families and Types.  That is why Rooms still show up because they have been created, even if not visible in plan. Sheets are just "hidden" by the Appears in Sheet Index parameter, but still exists in the model.  A Family or Family Type can't be placed and doesn't exist in the same place and therefor wouldn't be scheduled. 

The idea of scheduling things that aren't there seems like it could lead to disaster for QT or just about anything else a schedule is good at, which is only showing what is being used.

jordicunillperea
Enthusiast
Sure Sean, you are right, when you stay with the simplest and most immediate use of the schedules, without even folding the rows
RTempleV4GAA
Explorer

This would be very useful for setting up wall types that might not be currently in the model, but will be by DD issue.

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Submit Idea  

Forma Design Contest


Technology Administrators