Revit links: Grids and levels

Revit links: Grids and levels

XXalessio.amodioXX
Collaborator Collaborator
8,173 Views
24 Replies
Message 1 of 25

Revit links: Grids and levels

XXalessio.amodioXX
Collaborator
Collaborator

Hi all,
Is there a way to hide automatically grids and levels of linked model in all the views?
In one model I might have e.g. 10 Links.

0 Likes
Accepted solutions (1)
8,174 Views
24 Replies
Replies (24)
Message 2 of 25

PavelAnd
Advisor
Advisor

Hi @XXalessio.amodioXX . Go to Manage Links and close workset with grids and levels.

1.png2.png

Best regards, Pavel Plotitsyn.

Message 3 of 25

hmunsell
Mentor
Mentor
  • get a floor plan view the way you want it to look with items turned on/off etc
  • view Ribbon
  • View Templates
  • Create View template from current view
  • Name it 

Then you can apply that view template to all floor plan views and the changes will be applied.

 

Do the same for any other view types, Ceiling Plan, Elevations, Schedules, etc...

 

https://knowledge.autodesk.com/support/revit-products/learn-explore/caas/CloudHelp/cloudhelp/2018/EN...

 

Howard Munsell
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.



EESignature


Message 4 of 25

ToanDN
Consultant
Consultant

If the link is a worksharing file then I would definitely try to close the Shared Levels and Grids first as suggested by @PavelAnd .  That so you won't have to turn the categories off for every view/view template.

 

If the link is not a worksharing file, or they did not keep the levels and grids in a separate workset, then you can do what suggested by @hmunsell .

Message 5 of 25

martijn_pater
Advisor
Advisor

If it's not a workshared file you could also create a view template with only the desired revit links settings, which only turns off the levels and grids for the linked file. Then apply your existing templates sequentially (unchecked revit links there). This way you can set it once for plans/sections/elevations. Requires some attention though as to which settings are applied, resetting/renewing templates alltogether is more failsafe probably if you don't want to think about it.

0 Likes
Message 6 of 25

hmunsell
Mentor
Mentor

why does everyone keep saying "If not a workshared file"?  We use VT's in my office on workshared files all the time and they work Great.

Howard Munsell
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.



EESignature


0 Likes
Message 7 of 25

ToanDN
Consultant
Consultant

@hmunsell wrote:

why does everyone keep saying "If not a workshared file"?  We use VT's in my office on workshared files all the time and they work Great.


Because close a linked workset is much quicker than modify a bunch of VTs.

0 Likes
Message 8 of 25

hmunsell
Mentor
Mentor

If that is all your using the VT for than i guess id agree with you. We have our VT's customized so the user just has to apply the correct, company standard, VT to a view and the view settings are adjusted/corrected. They seldom need to be modified.

Howard Munsell
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.



EESignature


0 Likes
Message 9 of 25

ToanDN
Consultant
Consultant

@hmunsell wrote:

If that is all your using the VT for than i guess id agree with you. We have our VT's customized so the user just has to apply the correct, company standard, VT to a view and the view settings are adjusted/corrected. They seldom need to be modified.


It doesn't change or limit any usages or functionality of the templates.  However, closing a linked workset is a better way because it is project wise, whereas turning off via VG is template wise.  It is also worth noting that closing a workset is resource friendly than just turning categories/elements off.  

0 Likes
Message 10 of 25

hmunsell
Mentor
Mentor

ok, i can accept that 😁

Howard Munsell
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.



EESignature


0 Likes
Message 11 of 25

martijn_pater
Advisor
Advisor

If it is a workshared file you could use both methods above, if it's not you need to set the Visibility Graphics for the linked file either using a template or manually. Meaning if it's not a workshared file, that's the way to go otherwise preferably manage the links level and grids workset as above.

 

Ofcourse you have VT company settings, but if you ask me these should never have revit links included in those templates as it not properly managable imho.

0 Likes
Message 12 of 25

RDAOU
Mentor
Mentor

@ToanDN 

 


@ToanDN wrote:

@hmunsell wrote:

why does everyone keep saying "If not a workshared file"?  We use VT's in my office on workshared files all the time and they work Great.


Because close a linked workset is much quicker than modify a bunch of VTs.


Closing the Workset as suggested in Reply 2 has a global effect on all views...Are you suggesting that this is the right way to go in a workshared environment? What about those who need the levels from the linked model?

 

 

 

 

 

 

YOUTUBE | BIM | COMPUTATIONAL DESIGN | PARAMETRIC DESIGN | GENERATIVE DESIGN | VISUAL PROGRAMMING
If you find this reply helpful kindly hit the LIKE BUTTON and if applicable please ACCEPT AS SOLUTION


0 Likes
Message 13 of 25

RDAOU
Mentor
Mentor

@martijn_pater 

 

Manageability is relative...for a data entry level user, both are not manageable, for a BIM coordinator+ both are eaqually manageable 🙂

 

moreover, having 2 workflows (1 for workshared and 1 for non-workshared) vs 1 workflow for both on such a simple task, the latter prevails (at least in terms of manageability)

 

 

YOUTUBE | BIM | COMPUTATIONAL DESIGN | PARAMETRIC DESIGN | GENERATIVE DESIGN | VISUAL PROGRAMMING
If you find this reply helpful kindly hit the LIKE BUTTON and if applicable please ACCEPT AS SOLUTION


0 Likes
Message 14 of 25

ToanDN
Consultant
Consultant
I will let OP to clarify if he wants to turn them off for all views or for some views.
0 Likes
Message 15 of 25

SteveKStafford
Mentor
Mentor
Accepted solution

Even though it is very tempting to use Specify and Close a specific workset, I favor using a Filter and View Templates.

 

I find relying on Worksets is too vulnerable to others not assigning all the grids/levels to the correct workset. It is too dependent on people I don't/can't exert any control over. It's nearly inevitable that it will happen on at least one if not several links and vary over time. I've seen projects that start out fine but end up with changes and grids are routinely missing or showing up whenever someone has decided to rely on the workset approach.

 

In contrast, I can control our grid/level names so a Filter can always isolate mine from theirs. Then our view templates include a filter to turn them off. It does take a little planning in advance and VT/Filter configuring. Once it is configured I can deal with other things. We just make sure all views that get printed (on sheets) have a VT. I use a few views that always show the grids/levels so it is easy to see if they are not still coordinated.


Steve Stafford
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.
EESignature

Message 16 of 25

XXalessio.amodioXX
Collaborator
Collaborator

Well explained.
Most of the time link are coming from external company which have their standards quite impossible to fully control.
I find your solution optimal.

0 Likes
Message 17 of 25

martijn_pater
Advisor
Advisor

@SteveKStafford wrote:

In contrast, I can control our grid/level names so a Filter can always isolate mine from theirs. Then our view templates include a filter to turn them off.


Filtering is a good method I agree. You could just filter by scope box if you filter by 'begin with' ie. and assign all your own levels grids to some own scopebox naming convention. No need to name every individual grid/level then. edit: Although perhaps not everyone is as comfortable/careful using scopeboxes, maybe do both...

And what I meant by managable is that View templates are pre-set settings for your Visibility Graphics which are the same with every project. Whereas linked files are always project specific, so including those in templates is not logical imho. So I prefer to just customize the Revit link settings either with VG or seperate template.

0 Likes
Message 18 of 25

hmunsell
Mentor
Mentor

@martijn_pater wrote:

If it is a workshared file you could use both methods above,


this is what we do. we don't rely on the VT's to control everything. but they are the basis of making the views look consistent.

Howard Munsell
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.



EESignature


0 Likes
Message 19 of 25

SteveKStafford
Mentor
Mentor

@martijn_pater wrote:

No need to name every individual grid/level then.

It's possible you misunderstand me.

 

As you know, all grids/levels have a type name. If I work for ABC Architecture I can generally assume that adding a prefix of ABC_ to each type name is enough to make my own grid/level names unique. That's defined in our project template(s). Combine that with a filter that looks for a grid/level that does not contain ABC_ is enough to remove all grids/levels other than my own. The people I work with don't have to think about assigning grids/levels to a workset or scope box or anything and they never have to care what the consultants grids/levels types are named or which workset they are assigned to.

 

If I happen to encounter a project that works with a consultant that uses the same prefix we use I can make mine different again by adding one character to the type name, such as *ABC_ and revise one filter and everything goes back to normal.


Steve Stafford
Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.
EESignature

Message 20 of 25

martijn_pater
Advisor
Advisor

Ah right, i did and didnt;) Didnt quite read that as you meant it. That works... how do you turn of linked scope boxes?

0 Likes