Key differences from Revit 2013 to 2019 in terms of Architectural Drafting

[Anonymous]

Hello,

I am having to comprise a list of changes from Revit 2013 to 2019 in ordered to propose to my workplace for them to upgrade their software.

I have comprised a list of quiet a few things but need a few more. if anyone has anything they have noticed in the newer versions that have helped them with productivity and efficiency would be greatly appreciated.

Or even a link of updates I can refer to would be perfect also

Thank you 

[ToanDN]

Can you share your list so that we don't repeat what you already know?

[Anonymous]

Sure so iv started from revit 2019 and working my back of the changes from 2013,

Keep in mind these updates are mainly beneficial for myself with architectural drafting.

*Ability to model in 3D

* Ability to quickly create a section box of a view.

* Multiple Monitors

* Double Fill Patterns 

* Ability to edit models from a Perspective View 

* Crop and Morph callouts and Views 

[ToanDN]

Those are more like modeling features, aren't they? Anyways:

- improved text formatting
- improved schedule title/header formatting
- combined parameters in schedules
- calculated values as labels in Tag families
- linking Navisworks models for coordination
- railing follows topo
- split railing along a stair
- 3D levels

[barthbradley]

Subscription vs Perpetual Licensing.  That'll need to be addressed for sure.  

[Anonymous]

Good point, thank you for your answer 

[Anonymous]

yeah i guess they are the things that will made drafting quicker if you can model things more efficiently. 

thanks for your answer i will add them to my list 

[barthbradley]

...how about just the pointing out the fact that updating the software will keep the firm competitive in the marketplace and afford them more opportunities.  I've never seen an RFP specify "double fill pattern" or "dual monitor" requirements.  Know what I mean, jelly bean? 

[ToanDN]

...
- Global parameters (quite a gem)
- Expand and collapse Project browser categories

[loboarch · Accepted solution]

Here are a few of the "what's New Pages from that period.

2019

http://help.autodesk.com/view/RVT/2019/ENU/?guid=GUID-C81929D7-02CB-4BF7-A637-9B98EC9EB38B

2018

http://help.autodesk.com/view/RVT/2018/ENU/?guid=GUID-C81929D7-02CB-4BF7-A637-9B98EC9EB38B

2017

http://help.autodesk.com/view/RVT/2017/ENU/?guid=GUID-EAA03C33-5021-4B27-8C1B-0E0EEE53DA7A

2016

http://help.autodesk.com/view/RVT/2016/ENU/?guid=GUID-8349E649-F5AF-4FB5-9ED6-82BD5815F9C3

2015

http://help.autodesk.com/view/RVT/2015/ENU/?guid=GUID-792F6026-B9B0-43A7-8D39-2C493BF4A130

2014

http://help.autodesk.com/view/RVT/2014/ENU/?guid=GUID-662FCDF8-FD38-49CB-9B30-48F9D9934BA0

[Viveka_CD]

Hi @Anonymous

Check out this blog by Silvia Knauer which discusses more about changes between Revit design versions

If you find posts have solved your problem, please click on 'Accept as solution' to help others with similar questions.

Thank you.

[Anonymous]

Revit 2013 - Unsupported

Revit 2019 - Supported

[barthbradley]

@Anonymous:

But wait! There's more! If you subscribe now, Autodesk will throw in 2018, 2017 and 2106 for free! ***

Another benefit:  Previous Version Rights.   

***some restrictions apply. 

[Anonymous]

this is perfect. thank you 

[Anonymous]

We (https://www.team4bim.com/architectural-drafting-services/ ) start to use new Revit versions everytime when new version is availible because of demand from our clients. Revit 2019 is more stable than 2013 and has better import/export functions and better cooperation with IFC files. If you have good architectural drafting skills and knowledge both Revit versions are suitable for work, but there is no significant diference between these two so if it cost you money then I suggest you to stick to the old version.