We have several families with symbolic "clearance zones" built in. When they are tagged, the leader will center on the clearance zone, and it drives the designers nuts to go and manually fix them all. I tried to change the lines to be "not a reference" but that doesn't work. Only invisible lines do the trick, which defeats the purpose.
I have also tried to have a visibility parameter on the families for the clearance zones, turn them off to tag, turn them back on, but then the leader still points to the symbolic lines. Anything I'm not thinking of? Thanks!
Solved! Go to Solution.
Solved by ToanDN. Go to Solution.
Example of one family attached. There are several different equipment families that have the same throwback areas. Having the tag on the side of the family without the throwback lines it points to the 3D box, but as soon as you move the tag to the top or bottom, it points to the symbolic lines
Not sure what exactly you want, but have you tried Tagging with "Free End"?
I was trying to see if it was possible for the leader to ignore the hidden lines. But if it's not then tagging with free end on can work. The designers just feel like it's a big waste of time to "tag all" and then have to individually move the end of the leader to point to the 3D box and not the dashed lines
A couple of approaches could be:
1. Create a Model & Detail Group of a single Rack Families with Tag in the View, and then place additional Rack Families as Model Groups and then select all of them in the View and press Attach Detail Group to attach the Tag to all of then in one fell swoop.
2. Clipboard Copy/Paste the Tags between Views instead of starting over in each View from scratch.
Kind of an odd solution. So, now - with the nested approach - you have 2 tags automatically placed when you do a "Tag All". Before, it was single tags with leaders. Now, it's double tags with leaders. So, now the fix includes not only correcting the leader, but also deleting the duplicate tag and leader ... PLUS, some other fixes that will be made necessary because of using the "nested approach". 😉
Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.