Building pad 0,0002 m over the cut topography, why?

[tareqathamneh6QW84]

it is adding some unnecessary calculation to my quantities schedule..

Thansk!

[barthbradley]

This is about 0.0078740157 Inches (1/127")?  

[barthbradley]

Maybe the soil is wet. Let it dry out.  😉  

[tareqathamneh6QW84]

@barthbradley 😂 dude..

this is messing my schedule .. 

[barthbradley]

I don't understand the issue.  You say the Building Pad is slightly higher than the top of the Toposurface. So what?  Also, how does this mess with a Schedule? A Schedule of what? Topography?  The Pad and the Topo are two separate Categories.  

[barthbradley]

Maybe your Building Pad has a Height Offset from Level?  

[tareqathamneh6QW84]

@barthbradley The pad is at the correct level, which is aready dug, but the toposurface is starting a tiny bit under it, which adds 0,02 m3 to my schedule instead of being a clean zero..

[barthbradley]

@tareqathamneh6QW84: I don't want to play guessing game anymore.  Post your file here and I'll tell you exactly what's going on and what to do about it.    

[barthbradley]

just a thought here...

Is your Building Pad made up of layers?  

[tareqathamneh6QW84]

@barthbradley here is the file, thanks, I appreciate it.

there are no layers in the pad..

[ToanDN]

Set Height Offset from Level to 0.

[barthbradley]

Solution is posted in Message #6.  

Set the Pad's Height Offset from Level to ZERO.  

[tareqathamneh6QW84]

I did, still there. 

[ToanDN]

---

@tareqathamneh6QW84 wrote:

I did, still there. 

---

The topo itself already has 0.203 m3 Cut without the pad.  Did you create it using Graded Region?