Hi guys please take a look at this image and let me know how can achieve this objective.
thanks
Will
Solved! Go to Solution.
Hi guys please take a look at this image and let me know how can achieve this objective.
thanks
Will
Solved! Go to Solution.
Solved by barthbradley. Go to Solution.
Bradley? any suggestions?
Bradley? any suggestions?
@wagurto wrote:Bradley? any suggestions?
About what? I am not clear what you are asking, or are referring to in your last post (message 20). Did you download and inspect the RVT I did for you (Message 13)?
@wagurto wrote:Bradley? any suggestions?
About what? I am not clear what you are asking, or are referring to in your last post (message 20). Did you download and inspect the RVT I did for you (Message 13)?
@wagurto wrote:
...
1-How do you do to make the dimensions visible con the revit file?
2-I created a share parameters to reflect front, rear, and sides setbacks. I made them instance and reporting parameters but i noticed when i import them to my revit file the dimensions are not longer visible and also the parallel lines are not longer adjustable. They are fixed now.
Could help me to understand what's going on?
thanks
Wil
___________________________________
Dimensions created in a family won't be visible in a project. These families are driven by points, not by dimensions.
@wagurto wrote:
...
1-How do you do to make the dimensions visible con the revit file?
2-I created a share parameters to reflect front, rear, and sides setbacks. I made them instance and reporting parameters but i noticed when i import them to my revit file the dimensions are not longer visible and also the parallel lines are not longer adjustable. They are fixed now.
Could help me to understand what's going on?
thanks
Wil
___________________________________
Dimensions created in a family won't be visible in a project. These families are driven by points, not by dimensions.
Try this. You will need to redo the shared parameter so you can control the setback from the schedule.
Try this. You will need to redo the shared parameter so you can control the setback from the schedule.
I think you are making it harder then it should be. Property lines and set back are likely a one time deal for each project. What about properties those have more than four points or curved segments?
An adaptive family may sound great in the begining but if you have a hard time making it works then perhaps it is not. As an user you also need to be adaptive, meaning adapt yourself to trying different tools and picking out what suite YOU best, not fixated to one and forcing it to work. Barely at best.
Here is what I would do. Draw the property lines using Property Line tool and draw the setback as another property lines, with setback parameters controlled by global parameters (overkill IMHO). Then you can use filters to control graphics and schedule everything you need.
I think you are making it harder then it should be. Property lines and set back are likely a one time deal for each project. What about properties those have more than four points or curved segments?
An adaptive family may sound great in the begining but if you have a hard time making it works then perhaps it is not. As an user you also need to be adaptive, meaning adapt yourself to trying different tools and picking out what suite YOU best, not fixated to one and forcing it to work. Barely at best.
Here is what I would do. Draw the property lines using Property Line tool and draw the setback as another property lines, with setback parameters controlled by global parameters (overkill IMHO). Then you can use filters to control graphics and schedule everything you need.
Please read previous comments and advices. You keep expecting to see in your project the dimensions that are created in the family, and expecting to drive the shape by changing values in parameters. It does not work that way, and it has been explained above, but you keep asking or expecting the same, so the discussion is not moving forward. Also, please consider ToanDN's comments above. If you have a very large site with many lots, it makes sense to make an adaptive family with setbacks for each lot. If not, other simpler methods as suggested above would be enough, specially if you're not familar with more advanced methods.
Please read previous comments and advices. You keep expecting to see in your project the dimensions that are created in the family, and expecting to drive the shape by changing values in parameters. It does not work that way, and it has been explained above, but you keep asking or expecting the same, so the discussion is not moving forward. Also, please consider ToanDN's comments above. If you have a very large site with many lots, it makes sense to make an adaptive family with setbacks for each lot. If not, other simpler methods as suggested above would be enough, specially if you're not familar with more advanced methods.
@wagurto wrote:
... a dimension object which is able to report its value to a schedule, that's all that i need it. But i think this element does not existing. ...
_________________________________
@wagurto Are you really reading messages in this thread? What you need is explained in messages # 11 and 19 above by@barthbradley and the reason why it works that way and not the way you keep expecting, is explained in other messages.
@wagurto wrote:
... a dimension object which is able to report its value to a schedule, that's all that i need it. But i think this element does not existing. ...
_________________________________
@wagurto Are you really reading messages in this thread? What you need is explained in messages # 11 and 19 above by@barthbradley and the reason why it works that way and not the way you keep expecting, is explained in other messages.
Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.