Please make recap a native Windows 10 app.  This would work with the Hololens Show More

I am trying to mesh a building larger than the 30m limit box to share in the Autodesk Viewer. This is not currently an option but would be beneficial for the software. Show More

Support of "fish-eye lenses" in ReCap Photo would be very usefull. See photo attached.   It's a common way of collecting data by drones. In my case I would like to use the photos in ReCap and InfraWorks for creating a surface and making analysis.   Regards, Eric Show More

Until there is a way for Recap 360 to prove it is accurate it will remain a novelty.   What we need is one a better way to add and assign GCPs (Ground Control Points) to Recap .  Two we need an official Report that can be created to show the errors for each GSP.  We need to see just how close to our ground targets the final product really is.   Have a look at what others are providing and include something similar.   Before we waste out time of exporting and importing into Recap then into Civil 3D (or whatever) we need to know if what we are about to import is accurate enough for our needs.   As of right now this is not being done and until then any data from Recap 360 or Recap is just conceptual in nature as is about about as valuable as the old Google Earth surfaces we were able to import back in 2012.   Sure the final model sure looks pretty, but if it isn't accurate what good is it?  Proofs in the Pudding!     Bill Neuhauser. Show More

It would be great if Recap Photo could export with texture! Some avenues I am trying to explore include:   -exporting to .obj with texture to view in the Autodesk viewer   -being able to overlay the TrueView photos on the pointcloud or mesh   and/ or   -taking the "textured" view from Recap Photo and importing it into another software.   Show More

I am currently a student and we are learning how to use photogrammetry. Last semester, we used Remake for a photogrammetry project and we loved it. Now we are doing another photogrammetry project with Recap but as part of a mock-up game to see how it all works together. I am confused as to why I only have 6 credits left (started with 40 or so) and still have 7/8 of the cloud storage left. I used up my 3 projects allotted trying to do one photogrammetry object with some mistakes, as I am learning, and now I'm stuck without the ability to take another crack at it.   I think that it would be better for students that are trying to learn more about photogrammetry to either have more tries (like a 3 month unlimited projects with 10 GB of space) or the ability to use Remake and not be forced to install Recap so the whole credit/number of projects problem won't exist. Basically, with all of the failing going on or even testing out all of the options that are available to see what the differences are, I think that it would be better to let us experiment with it in all of its glory without these limitations. Then we will be able to appreciate the sophistication of the software.   Also, on another note, I'm not too pleased with how much more time it takes to create the model. I wish that there was still the option to just do it on my local computer instead of having to upload and all of that. If you wanted to keep some kind of credit system linked to our accounts and force upload a copy of the project to the cloud, then whatever. But it takes forever for me to upload and wait until the model is composed. It literally takes 5+ times longer than doing it locally. It's kind of a waste of time to wait, especially when the process is already long enough to begin with.   I'm not trying to be harsh or anything. I just believe in the hands on experience that we need to try to understand what is going on and what we need to do, and also in the efficiency of the entire process of this method of creating mesh. Thanks for your time, Mark Show More

What? This is a little gross. I know that uni students aren't your main concern but I can't use this if I'm limited to 100 photos in my imagesets. Free programs like Meshroom are limitless! I have used Meshroom and I had my issues so I moved on to try something else, but when I tried ReCap I was surprised to see this. How am I meant to make a decent model of anything bigger than an orange with 100 photos? As I'm sure you know, students don't have the money to pay you the egregious amounts of money you ask for for ones and zeroes on a screen, so when we pay our universities over £9,000 a year and they give us a subscription to a professional service that helps us complete our work to a fantastic quality, no one expects them to tell you that despite all that you can only make substandard work. Just get rid of it. It just seems like a way to get people with too much money to relieve the annoyance of a limitation just by paying for it. It's a viable business model don't get me wrong, but not when people who actually need it and aren't incredibly wealthy have to suffer because of it.   Thanks for reading, Taylor H.  Show More

Would it be possible to get ReCap Pro (scan to mesh, cleanup etc), Photo to 3D and Real View cloud services get added to Autodesk's Health Dashboard at health.autodesk.com? Or some other health status somewhere so we know when the services are having issues or planned maintenance. Show More