Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
Show only
|
Search instead for
Did you mean:
This page has been translated for your convenience with an automatic translation service. This is not an official translation and may contain errors and inaccurate translations. Autodesk does not warrant, either expressly or implied, the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the information translated by the machine translation service and will not be liable for damages or losses caused by the trust placed in the translation service.Translate
Well actually i hesitate between the ryzen 5950x and the intel 10900k. I see a lot of people saying the 5950x is overall the best (for gaming) but on the other hand, from what i understand, clockspeed is more important than the number of cores when it comes to 3d programs (except for rendering), and the i9 10900k has a higher clockspeed than the 5950x (3.7 GHz vs 3.4 for the 5950). But then again the 5950 have 6 more cores, the i9 is known to have some heat issues and pretty much everywhere they say the 5950x is better (for gaming). So idk.
Well actually i hesitate between the ryzen 5950x and the intel 10900k. I see a lot of people saying the 5950x is overall the best (for gaming) but on the other hand, from what i understand, clockspeed is more important than the number of cores when it comes to 3d programs (except for rendering), and the i9 10900k has a higher clockspeed than the 5950x (3.7 GHz vs 3.4 for the 5950). But then again the 5950 have 6 more cores, the i9 is known to have some heat issues and pretty much everywhere they say the 5950x is better (for gaming). So idk.
Update : i didnt see, but the 5900x, which i didnt consider because i thought it was worse than 5950, actually has a base clockspeed of 3,7 GHx (same as 10900k) for 2 more cores than the intel (12 vs 10). So even if it has a lower overclocked speed than the 10900k (4.8 vs 5.3), i see it as a good compromise between the 5950x and 10900k, while being an AMD, which seems to be more reliable for the time being. Case closed for me.
Update : i didnt see, but the 5900x, which i didnt consider because i thought it was worse than 5950, actually has a base clockspeed of 3,7 GHx (same as 10900k) for 2 more cores than the intel (12 vs 10). So even if it has a lower overclocked speed than the 10900k (4.8 vs 5.3), i see it as a good compromise between the 5950x and 10900k, while being an AMD, which seems to be more reliable for the time being. Case closed for me.
