Community
Machining Discussions
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

HSMWorks 2017 / Solidworks Prem 2017 - 2D Chamfer problems

35 REPLIES 35
SOLVED
Reply
Message 1 of 36
Anonymous
1867 Views, 35 Replies

HSMWorks 2017 / Solidworks Prem 2017 - 2D Chamfer problems

I am having issues creating simple chamfers.  I've used both the chamfer tool path, and also the contour tool path, both with the same results.

 

No matter what I do, my chamfers are all at least .05" - huge!  

 

I am commanding a .01" chamfer.

 

Tool is touched off on a Renishaw OTS.

 

 

Why are the chamfers coming out so **** huuuuge?

 

The cutter is a 4fl carbide 90 deg chamfer mill

 

 

 

cham1.JPG

 

 

cham2.JPG

 

 

cham3.JPG

 

 

20170522_180430.jpg

 

 

 

 

35 REPLIES 35
Message 2 of 36
Laurens-3DTechDraw
in reply to: Anonymous

Which exact version of HSMWorks are you using?

There could be a couple of things, you are adding another chamfer width to the already modeled chamfer. If the chamfer is modeled don't give in the chamfer width.

Also selecting the face might not be what you want but just the top contour.

Laurens Wijnschenk
3DTechDraw

AutoDesk CAM user & Post editor.
René for Legend.


Message 3 of 36
Anonymous
in reply to: Laurens-3DTechDraw

Thanks.  I am on HSMWorks 2017 R3.41577

 

I'll try your suggestions.

 

What's odd is that it looks absolutely fine in the stock simulation

Message 4 of 36
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

Also check your tool geometry. If your tip diameter (inside Fusion's tool library) is smaller than actual, you migh get these symptoms.

Message 5 of 36
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

Thank you.  I have my tool defined correctly.

 

I am using Solidworks not Fusion.  

Message 6 of 36
al.whatmough
in reply to: Anonymous

I am not trying to push.  

 

However, are you 100% sure the tools are defined correctly.

 

More chamfer tools have a flat of the bottom of them.  So, if in CAM that tool is defined as coming to a sharp point or with a smaller flat then is actually has when it is measured by the probe then tool will be cutting lower than expected.

 

image.png

---------
AL Whatmough
Director Product Management - Manufacturing

Note, I love to engage on the forums. However, I spend a lot of time in meetings trying to help clear the path for our amazing team of Developers working on Manufacturing at Autodesk. So, if I don't respond immediately, it's not that I don't care.
Message 7 of 36
Anonymous
in reply to: al.whatmough

Yes its defined correctly.  It's a 45 deg, with a .02" flat.

 

Here is the latest one I did with using a zero and a zero in the contour.  I am still getting a .05" x .05" chamfer.

 

Making junk.  I am going to pull that tool and try something else - I just don't get it...  Few weeks ago I made some steel parts and this thing worked 100% fine... Now it's not responding to any numbers I put in the box!!?!?!  I've played with this all day so far and have done nothing but make junk.

 

 

contour1.JPGcontour2.JPG

Message 8 of 36
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

20170523_111701.jpg

Message 9 of 36
al.whatmough
in reply to: Anonymous

that is odd... let us know what you find when you pull the tool.

 

Also, if you attached your file I will take a look.  However, from the screenshot, it looks like the toolpath is in the correct spot.

 

 

---------
AL Whatmough
Director Product Management - Manufacturing

Note, I love to engage on the forums. However, I spend a lot of time in meetings trying to help clear the path for our amazing team of Developers working on Manufacturing at Autodesk. So, if I don't respond immediately, it's not that I don't care.
Message 10 of 36
lenny_1962
in reply to: Anonymous

suppress the chamfers and keep the corners sharp, the problem is the 2D chamfer is adding to the modeled chamfer.

 

I make configurations of the part in SW and then use HSMWorks in an assembly, that way you can drop the different configuration into the assembly and use the different states of the part to do different things or avoid holes, chamfers, rads or what ever for a cleaner way to control whats happening. 

Message 11 of 36
Anonymous
in reply to: lenny_1962

Honestly I did that first.... I had just the straight edge drawn in at first, and I was getting the exact same results...  So I decided to try to draw it with the chamfer, still no difference...  I watched youtube videos just to make for certain I wasn't doing something wrong.

 

No matter what numbers I put in, no matter if the chamfer is in the model or not, I am getting a .05 x .05 chamfer every single time.

Message 12 of 36
lenny_1962
in reply to: Anonymous

ok I have to just ask this????

 

is the cutter set correct at the machine?

 

any comp set?

Message 13 of 36
Anonymous
in reply to: lenny_1962

Im not using cutter comp.  It's zero and set to "in computer"

 

 

I just used a completely different tool, and got the exact same result...

 

What is going on??

Message 14 of 36
Laurens-3DTechDraw
in reply to: Anonymous

Is this going on: https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/hsm-beta-testing-english-deutsch/hsmworks2018-r1-41866-2d-chamfer-wro...

 

Check your code it outputs compensation codes.

Laurens Wijnschenk
3DTechDraw

AutoDesk CAM user & Post editor.
René for Legend.


Message 15 of 36
Anonymous
in reply to: Laurens-3DTechDraw

This is possible as I am floored as to what else it could be.

 

I'll install HSMWorks2018-R1.41872 and report back - thank you!

Message 16 of 36
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

Didn't work guys.  Same junk!

Message 17 of 36
lenny_1962
in reply to: Anonymous

put up the file and i'll try it on my machine

Message 18 of 36
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

In this example I suppressed the chamfer, and set the tool at 0 and 0.  I used the contour line of the outline of the part itself.

 

In theory it should run the tool along but not cut anything correct?

I get the same .05 x .05 freaking chamfer!!!

 

WTF!!  I've wasted like 30 parts so far trying to fix this...

 

If I'm doing something stupid please let me know...  But honestly this is how I've done this using HSMWorks for like 10 years...never had an issue where it completely IGNORES what I put in the boxes. 

 

I am stumped and cannot proceed unless I figure this stupid crap out.....

 

 

Message 19 of 36
Anonymous
in reply to: Anonymous

20170523_131150.jpgcontour3.JPGcontour4.JPG

Message 20 of 36
lenny_1962
in reply to: Anonymous


@Anonymous wrote:

In this example I suppressed the chamfer, and set the tool at 0 and 0.  I used the contour line of the outline of the part itself.

 

In theory it should run the tool along but not cut anything correct?

I get the same .05 x .05 freaking chamfer!!!

 

WTF!!  I've wasted like 30 parts so far trying to fix this...

 

If I'm doing something stupid please let me know...  But honestly this is how I've done this using HSMWorks for like 10 years...never had an issue where it completely IGNORES what I put in the boxes. 

 

I am stumped and cannot proceed unless I figure this stupid crap out.....

 

 


PUT UP THE FILE!!

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums  

Technology Administrators


Autodesk Design & Make Report