Community
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Time to take a hard look at iMates

Time to take a hard look at iMates

For years I’ve dealt with Inventor users in all kinds of industries, and I have yet to encounter anyone who regularly uses iMates.  I’m sure there are some folks out there who do, but it’s an idea that sounds way better in theory than it works in practice.  The half of the relationship that you put on the stock part is fine.  The other half, which you put on the designed part is the problem.  It takes a certain amount clairvoyance to really get the goods out of iMates, and the bottom line is that they don’t save much time or effort.  iMates merely move the expended effort and time to a less convenient phase of the design process; the one where you’re making the part, not thinking about how to assemble it or which piece of hardware you’re going to use on it.

 

What would make iMates really useful is if you only had to pre-place them on one of the components.  I see it working like this:  An iMate rigid joint could be pre-placed onto the underside of a bolt head.  When you placed that bolt into an assembly, you could drag it by its iMate glyph to anyplace on another component where a rigid joint would be valid.  The software would detect the geometry and create a normal joint between the two components with no need to pull up the dialog box.

 

If iMates worked like that I would use them all day long, and I think a lot of others would as well.

2 Comments
jtylerbc
Mentor

I regularly use them, but mostly for specific purposes where most (or all) of the parts involved are standard, purchased parts.

 

You can already do something similar to what you're asking for, at least in specific scenarios.  For example, if you use the Alt+Drag method, you can connect an Insert iMate to not only a matching iMate, but any circular edge.  This is also how Content Center hardware placement works, except the CC interface replaces the Alt+Drag method.

Josh_Hunt
Advocate

Hi @Walt_Jaquith 

I like your idea of an "iMate Rigid Joint" but that would require an "iJoint" or a "Rigid Constraint" both could be very useful.

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Submit Idea  

Autodesk Design & Make Report