I guess I'm not doing a good enough job explaining the situation.
These constraints are not at the sub-assembly level. They are at my top assembly level, but applied to parts within my sub-assembly.
Let me try and write up a simplified sample situation:
Master Assembly:
~ Sub-assembly A
- Part A-1
- Part A-2
~ Part B
~ Part C
~ Part D
~ Part E
At my Master Assembly level, Parts B, C, D, and E are constrained to Sub-assembly A. I can see the list of constraints applied to Sub-assembly A by expanding its main node in Master Assembly. It will look like this:
Mate:1 (Part B:1,Sub-assembly A:1)
Mate:2 (Part C:1,Sub-assembly A:1)
Mate:3 (Part D:1,Sub-assembly A:1)
Mate:4 (Part E:1,Sub-assembly A:1)
However, what I want to find out is which of those constraints are acting on Part A-1 specifically. For example, is the right-hand side of Mate:1 applied to a workplane in Sub-assembly A? Or a face/workplane in Part A-1? Or a face/workplane in Part A-2?
I want to isolate the constraints, in the list above, that are acting specifically on Part A-1 within Sub-assembly A.
I know that Part A-1 is my problem part. The Design Doctor and "related relationship failure analysis" are not helping me here, the assembly is too complex. This is a massive assembly (that I did not make) with hundreds of parts, hundreds of constraints, and Adaptivity involved, and the Design Doctors is not even able to determine which of the constraints applied to Sub-assembly A in my Master Assembly are the conflicting ones. So I'm trying to diagnose the thing manually. It wold be very easy if I could somehow isolate which of the dozens and dozens of constraints on my Sub-assembly A are applied to Part A-1 specifically, since I know that Part A-1 is my problem part.