Off topic rant. But had to state this.
@Anonymous and to anyone else following this thread, please be aware this is a discussion forum. If anyone even as gets a hint that you are not trying to learn, rather want someone else to do your work for you, its quickly going to get very hilarious for anyone else who might try to follow the thread. People who try to help you like JD and Tommi and are highly respected and long time users of the software and you are possibly only getting started with, even if you think you've been using this forever.. just look at the number of posts they have already helped in, and you will know what I mean. Please be courteous, moreover, do try to follow the instructions instead of getting rude, and please show your steps and include the files you have tried to work on. But above all, please do your own research. If you want someone to do your work for you, you will have to go through a lot of humiliation, being ignored, mental and verbal pain, or possibly all three. Senior members share their time and expertise with you so that you may learn, not to do your job for you.
Additionally, do mark your threads as answered when you get to the place where you can complete your intended operation. Kindly go through the forum rules if you feel you dont understand why such a long winded post was necessary.
On topic:
Inventor provides a way to map your custom image based material onto any surface. The tools can be accessed though the Appearance and Material Browser(s). Possibility of scaling, rotating, and using seamless textures to represent an infinite extent (i.e the image when tiled becomes a single continuous expanse). Please take a look at the Appearance tools to achieve the look-only way of solving this. For a physically correct model, the solution would require the determination of a geometrical set of points that accurately defines the required wire mesh in 3-Space, and then using loft or sweep to construct the unit pattern, thereafter using the rectangular pattern tool to create a NxM piece of the mesh. The original question post does not carry a complete description of the required mesh shape, rather indicates a parametric model where the parameters are named but not defined. Additional data is required to convert the input into the required shape/model.
