Community
Inventor Forum
Welcome to Autodesk’s Inventor Forums. Share your knowledge, ask questions, and explore popular Inventor topics.
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Chamfers on Drawings

23 REPLIES 23
SOLVED
Reply
Message 1 of 24
Anonymous
6113 Views, 23 Replies

Chamfers on Drawings

Anonymous
Not applicable

I am currently doing a drawing for a part where I have a 0.25mm chamfer on 2 edges. However, one of those edges is on a diagonal face, so the 0.25mm chamfer is being shown as 0.33 (see below). Is this the correct notation for the chamfer? I understand why Inventor is displaying 0.33, as the slanted face extends the chamfer slightly, but the chamfer used on the model was 0.25mm.

alextyler_0-1595943809559.png

 

Do I leave the notation as it is, or do I need to manually change it to C0.25?

0 Likes

Chamfers on Drawings

I am currently doing a drawing for a part where I have a 0.25mm chamfer on 2 edges. However, one of those edges is on a diagonal face, so the 0.25mm chamfer is being shown as 0.33 (see below). Is this the correct notation for the chamfer? I understand why Inventor is displaying 0.33, as the slanted face extends the chamfer slightly, but the chamfer used on the model was 0.25mm.

alextyler_0-1595943809559.png

 

Do I leave the notation as it is, or do I need to manually change it to C0.25?

23 REPLIES 23
Message 2 of 24
andrewiv
in reply to: Anonymous

andrewiv
Advisor
Advisor

Personally, I hate manually overriding dimensions on drawings, this is not AutoCAD.  But you cannot simply leave it with an incorrect value either.  I would create a view that shows the chamfer correctly.

Andrew In’t Veld
Designer

Personally, I hate manually overriding dimensions on drawings, this is not AutoCAD.  But you cannot simply leave it with an incorrect value either.  I would create a view that shows the chamfer correctly.

Andrew In’t Veld
Designer

Message 3 of 24
Cadmanto
in reply to: Anonymous

Cadmanto
Mentor
Mentor

My suggestion (this is what I do when confronted with a similar instance) would be to delete the .33 chamfer and place a "2X" in front of the .25 chamfer callout.

 

EE LOGO.png
Windows 10 x64 -16GB Ram
Intel i7-6700 @ 3.41ghz
nVidia GTS 250 - 1 GB
Inventor Pro 2021

 

Best Regards,
Scott McFadden
(Colossians 3:23-25)


0 Likes

My suggestion (this is what I do when confronted with a similar instance) would be to delete the .33 chamfer and place a "2X" in front of the .25 chamfer callout.

 

EE LOGO.png
Windows 10 x64 -16GB Ram
Intel i7-6700 @ 3.41ghz
nVidia GTS 250 - 1 GB
Inventor Pro 2021

 

Best Regards,
Scott McFadden
(Colossians 3:23-25)


Message 4 of 24
Anonymous
in reply to: Cadmanto

Anonymous
Not applicable

Might look into this, quite like that idea. My only issue with that is it doesn't denote where the second chamfer is. Can I add multiple arrows to one measurement?

0 Likes

Might look into this, quite like that idea. My only issue with that is it doesn't denote where the second chamfer is. Can I add multiple arrows to one measurement?

Message 5 of 24
CGBenner
in reply to: Anonymous

CGBenner
Community Manager
Community Manager

Was the Chamfer created with the chamfer tool?  And, was the dimension placed using the Chamfer dimension tool?  Using the chamfer dimension tool, as long as you choose the right references, I believe, it should reflect the values you entered when creating the feature.

CGBenner_0-1595947133132.png

 


Chris Benner
Industry Community Manager – Design & Manufacturing


If a response answers your question, please use  ACCEPT SOLUTION  to assist other users later.


Also be generous with Likes!  Thank you and enjoy!


Become an Autodesk Fusion Insider
Inventor/Beta Feedback Project
0 Likes

Was the Chamfer created with the chamfer tool?  And, was the dimension placed using the Chamfer dimension tool?  Using the chamfer dimension tool, as long as you choose the right references, I believe, it should reflect the values you entered when creating the feature.

CGBenner_0-1595947133132.png

 


Chris Benner
Industry Community Manager – Design & Manufacturing


If a response answers your question, please use  ACCEPT SOLUTION  to assist other users later.


Also be generous with Likes!  Thank you and enjoy!


Become an Autodesk Fusion Insider
Inventor/Beta Feedback Project
Message 6 of 24
Anonymous
in reply to: CGBenner

Anonymous
Not applicable

I did use the chamfer tool. Please see my chamfer settings below:

alextyler_0-1595947462117.png

 

0 Likes

I did use the chamfer tool. Please see my chamfer settings below:

alextyler_0-1595947462117.png

 

Message 7 of 24
Cadmanto
in reply to: Anonymous

Cadmanto
Mentor
Mentor

2X is a commonly used practice as per ASME spec.

Yes, you can add a second leader to point to the second chamfer.  This would eliminate the confusion of where it is.

CHAMFER.jpg

 

EE LOGO.png
Windows 10 x64 -16GB Ram
Intel i7-6700 @ 3.41ghz
nVidia GTS 250 - 1 GB
Inventor Pro 2021

 

 

Best Regards,
Scott McFadden
(Colossians 3:23-25)


0 Likes

2X is a commonly used practice as per ASME spec.

Yes, you can add a second leader to point to the second chamfer.  This would eliminate the confusion of where it is.

CHAMFER.jpg

 

EE LOGO.png
Windows 10 x64 -16GB Ram
Intel i7-6700 @ 3.41ghz
nVidia GTS 250 - 1 GB
Inventor Pro 2021

 

 

Best Regards,
Scott McFadden
(Colossians 3:23-25)


Message 8 of 24
andrewiv
in reply to: Anonymous

andrewiv
Advisor
Advisor

Try selecting a different reference edge when creating your chamfer note on the drawing.

 

In the pic below I created a 0.25 chamfer in the model.  The bottom note is using a vertical line as the reference edge and the top note is using a horizontal line as the reference edge.

Chamfer.PNG

Andrew In’t Veld
Designer

0 Likes

Try selecting a different reference edge when creating your chamfer note on the drawing.

 

In the pic below I created a 0.25 chamfer in the model.  The bottom note is using a vertical line as the reference edge and the top note is using a horizontal line as the reference edge.

Chamfer.PNG

Andrew In’t Veld
Designer

Message 9 of 24
CGBenner
in reply to: Anonymous

CGBenner
Community Manager
Community Manager

@Anonymous 

 

Playing with this a little bit, you can get different dimension results depending on the references you choose.  In my poorly drawn image below, the dimensions were placed using the same color references.  The red dimension is the correct value based on the feature settings.  You may have to simply change the dimension references using the Chamfer dimension.

 

CGBenner_0-1595948273400.png

 


Chris Benner
Industry Community Manager – Design & Manufacturing


If a response answers your question, please use  ACCEPT SOLUTION  to assist other users later.


Also be generous with Likes!  Thank you and enjoy!


Become an Autodesk Fusion Insider
Inventor/Beta Feedback Project
0 Likes

@Anonymous 

 

Playing with this a little bit, you can get different dimension results depending on the references you choose.  In my poorly drawn image below, the dimensions were placed using the same color references.  The red dimension is the correct value based on the feature settings.  You may have to simply change the dimension references using the Chamfer dimension.

 

CGBenner_0-1595948273400.png

 


Chris Benner
Industry Community Manager – Design & Manufacturing


If a response answers your question, please use  ACCEPT SOLUTION  to assist other users later.


Also be generous with Likes!  Thank you and enjoy!


Become an Autodesk Fusion Insider
Inventor/Beta Feedback Project
Message 10 of 24
Anonymous
in reply to: Cadmanto

Anonymous
Not applicable

I can't get this feature to work. I click Add Vertex / Leader, and no matter what I click I can't get another Leader to appear. Any advice?

0 Likes

I can't get this feature to work. I click Add Vertex / Leader, and no matter what I click I can't get another Leader to appear. Any advice?

Message 11 of 24
Anonymous
in reply to: andrewiv

Anonymous
Not applicable

I just tried this. By selecting a horizontal reference, I can get C0.24. Seems like that should be right, I'm just not sure why it's not reading 0.25.

0 Likes

I just tried this. By selecting a horizontal reference, I can get C0.24. Seems like that should be right, I'm just not sure why it's not reading 0.25.

Message 12 of 24
CGBenner
in reply to: Anonymous

CGBenner
Community Manager
Community Manager

@Anonymous wrote:

I just tried this. By selecting a horizontal reference, I can get C0.24. Seems like that should be right, I'm just not sure why it's not reading 0.25.


What is the actual dimension of your feature?  It may be just a precision issue with the dimension itself?  The decimal precision can be set globally in your Dimension styles, but can also be overridden by double clicking on the dimension and selecting Precision and Tolerance.


Chris Benner
Industry Community Manager – Design & Manufacturing


If a response answers your question, please use  ACCEPT SOLUTION  to assist other users later.


Also be generous with Likes!  Thank you and enjoy!


Become an Autodesk Fusion Insider
Inventor/Beta Feedback Project
0 Likes


@Anonymous wrote:

I just tried this. By selecting a horizontal reference, I can get C0.24. Seems like that should be right, I'm just not sure why it's not reading 0.25.


What is the actual dimension of your feature?  It may be just a precision issue with the dimension itself?  The decimal precision can be set globally in your Dimension styles, but can also be overridden by double clicking on the dimension and selecting Precision and Tolerance.


Chris Benner
Industry Community Manager – Design & Manufacturing


If a response answers your question, please use  ACCEPT SOLUTION  to assist other users later.


Also be generous with Likes!  Thank you and enjoy!


Become an Autodesk Fusion Insider
Inventor/Beta Feedback Project
Message 13 of 24
Anonymous
in reply to: CGBenner

Anonymous
Not applicable

The x is 0.238 and y is 0.325, so that's why they're displaying wrong. Not 100% sure why the x value is not 0.25, as I would've thought this would be the reference dimension for the chamfer?

0 Likes

The x is 0.238 and y is 0.325, so that's why they're displaying wrong. Not 100% sure why the x value is not 0.25, as I would've thought this would be the reference dimension for the chamfer?

Message 14 of 24
Cadmanto
in reply to: Anonymous

Cadmanto
Mentor
Mentor

I can get it to work.  When you select the note and select what I said in my previous posting, then select the second chamfer and run leader back to the original chamfer note to merge the two.

 

CHAMFER1.jpg

 

EE LOGO.png

Windows 10 x64 -16GB Ram
Intel i7-6700 @ 3.41ghz
nVidia GTS 250 - 1 GB
Inventor Pro 2021

 

Best Regards,
Scott McFadden
(Colossians 3:23-25)


0 Likes

I can get it to work.  When you select the note and select what I said in my previous posting, then select the second chamfer and run leader back to the original chamfer note to merge the two.

 

CHAMFER1.jpg

 

EE LOGO.png

Windows 10 x64 -16GB Ram
Intel i7-6700 @ 3.41ghz
nVidia GTS 250 - 1 GB
Inventor Pro 2021

 

Best Regards,
Scott McFadden
(Colossians 3:23-25)


Message 15 of 24
CGBenner
in reply to: Anonymous

CGBenner
Community Manager
Community Manager

@Anonymous 

 

That is interesting.  Can you share the part file here so I can have a look?


Chris Benner
Industry Community Manager – Design & Manufacturing


If a response answers your question, please use  ACCEPT SOLUTION  to assist other users later.


Also be generous with Likes!  Thank you and enjoy!


Become an Autodesk Fusion Insider
Inventor/Beta Feedback Project
0 Likes

@Anonymous 

 

That is interesting.  Can you share the part file here so I can have a look?


Chris Benner
Industry Community Manager – Design & Manufacturing


If a response answers your question, please use  ACCEPT SOLUTION  to assist other users later.


Also be generous with Likes!  Thank you and enjoy!


Become an Autodesk Fusion Insider
Inventor/Beta Feedback Project
Message 16 of 24
johnsonshiue
in reply to: Anonymous

johnsonshiue
Community Manager
Community Manager

Hi! Please take a look at the following thread. It may apply to your case.

 

https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/inventor-forum/chamfer-distance-x-angle-problem/m-p/9547292

 

Many thanks!

 



Johnson Shiue (johnson.shiue@autodesk.com)
Software Test Engineer

Hi! Please take a look at the following thread. It may apply to your case.

 

https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/inventor-forum/chamfer-distance-x-angle-problem/m-p/9547292

 

Many thanks!

 



Johnson Shiue (johnson.shiue@autodesk.com)
Software Test Engineer
Message 17 of 24
IgorMir
in reply to: johnsonshiue

IgorMir
Mentor
Mentor

I knew I had replied to a similar post before! 🙂

 


@johnsonshiue wrote:

Hi! Please take a look at the following thread. It may apply to your case.

 

https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/inventor-forum/chamfer-distance-x-angle-problem/m-p/9547292

 

Many thanks!


 

Web: www.meqc.com.au

I knew I had replied to a similar post before! 🙂

 


@johnsonshiue wrote:

Hi! Please take a look at the following thread. It may apply to your case.

 

https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/inventor-forum/chamfer-distance-x-angle-problem/m-p/9547292

 

Many thanks!


 

Web: www.meqc.com.au
Message 18 of 24
Anonymous
in reply to: johnsonshiue

Anonymous
Not applicable

Hi, following on from what this article said, I tried manually inputting distances and using a distance and an angle, but for some reason that didn't work either. It's a work project, not personal, so I can't share the files (IPR reasons), but I'll provide you some more screenshots (below):

alextyler_0-1596007928243.png

alextyler_1-1596008003393.png

The scenario has changed slightly. If I select an x or a y reference, the chamfer value given is 0.37, whereas it used to display different values. That's confusing me even more, as to me that means it is completely ignoring the 0.25 rule?

 

0 Likes

Hi, following on from what this article said, I tried manually inputting distances and using a distance and an angle, but for some reason that didn't work either. It's a work project, not personal, so I can't share the files (IPR reasons), but I'll provide you some more screenshots (below):

alextyler_0-1596007928243.png

alextyler_1-1596008003393.png

The scenario has changed slightly. If I select an x or a y reference, the chamfer value given is 0.37, whereas it used to display different values. That's confusing me even more, as to me that means it is completely ignoring the 0.25 rule?

 

Message 19 of 24
johnsonshiue
in reply to: Anonymous

johnsonshiue
Community Manager
Community Manager

Hi Alex,

 

If possible, please share the part here. There should be a logical reason to explain it. The images do not help me understand the issue better.

Many thanks!

 



Johnson Shiue (johnson.shiue@autodesk.com)
Software Test Engineer
0 Likes

Hi Alex,

 

If possible, please share the part here. There should be a logical reason to explain it. The images do not help me understand the issue better.

Many thanks!

 



Johnson Shiue (johnson.shiue@autodesk.com)
Software Test Engineer
Message 20 of 24
Anonymous
in reply to: johnsonshiue

Anonymous
Not applicable

Please see the attached part file.

 

Please see the attached part file.

 

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums  

Autodesk Design & Make Report