Assumed connection in sheet metal needs a tighter radius?

Assumed connection in sheet metal needs a tighter radius?

Anonymous
Not applicable
913 Views
12 Replies
Message 1 of 13

Assumed connection in sheet metal needs a tighter radius?

Anonymous
Not applicable

so im working on this (attached) in sheet metal mode and the two metal parts recieved an assumed bend and that isnt a problem, the problem is the radius is /24 and we want it to be .15, how can i fix this?

0 Likes
Accepted solutions (2)
914 Views
12 Replies
Replies (12)
Message 2 of 13

mdavis22569
Mentor
Mentor

What's the thickness of your material? 

 

 

 


Did you find this reply helpful ? If so please use the Accept as Solution or Kudos button below.

---------
Mike Davis

EESignature

0 Likes
Message 3 of 13

Anonymous
Not applicable

i just used the face tool on a sketch and went with what it gave me, if in inspect the thickness is .12

 

0 Likes
Message 4 of 13

mdavis22569
Mentor
Mentor
Accepted solution

attach your part...

 

what version of Inventor 

 

 

also if you have a thickness of .12 ..and your radius is twice that ... you might want to change your thickness (sheet metal default) to .075 so it'll be a .15 outside radius and a .075 inside radius...   

That's typically how bends work

 


Did you find this reply helpful ? If so please use the Accept as Solution or Kudos button below.

---------
Mike Davis

EESignature

Message 5 of 13

JDMather
Consultant
Consultant
Accepted solution

@Anonymous wrote:

i just used the face tool on a sketch and went with what it gave me, if in inspect the thickness is .12

 


So what do you really really want the Thickness to be?

 

Sheet metal bends are normally specified to the inside radius - not the outside radius.

 

Both the Thickness and Bend Radius can be set in the Sheet Metal Styles.

 

Sheet Metal Styles.png


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Autodesk Inventor 2019 Certified Professional
Autodesk AutoCAD 2013 Certified Professional
Certified SolidWorks Professional


Message 6 of 13

Anonymous
Not applicable

sorry i am really new to sheet metal modeling, i am great with normal 3d but i dont know... i have attached the part and will try what you said

0 Likes
Message 7 of 13

mdavis22569
Mentor
Mentor

 

start there with the right thickness you're looking for ...

 

 

here.PNG

 

 

22.PNG


Did you find this reply helpful ? If so please use the Accept as Solution or Kudos button below.

---------
Mike Davis

EESignature

0 Likes
Message 8 of 13

JDMather
Consultant
Consultant

@Anonymous wrote:

... i am great with normal 3d ...


Sketch1 is not using obvious symmetry about the origin.

Sketch2 is not fully defined and has a dangling line underneath a boundary line.

Sketch3 is not fully defined for the position of the holes.

 

Back in a minute with a "repaired" file.


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Autodesk Inventor 2019 Certified Professional
Autodesk AutoCAD 2013 Certified Professional
Certified SolidWorks Professional


Message 9 of 13

Anonymous
Not applicable

i sort of kind of changed it and changed the thickness

0 Likes
Message 10 of 13

mdavis22569
Mentor
Mentor

you now know how to change the thickness ..

 

however as JDMathers said you have other issues to fix in the ipt ...

 

 


Did you find this reply helpful ? If so please use the Accept as Solution or Kudos button below.

---------
Mike Davis

EESignature

Message 11 of 13

Anonymous
Not applicable

will these mistakes ruin the product or is it more stability issues?

0 Likes
Message 12 of 13

Anonymous
Not applicable

i believe i see exactly what you mean, i the file and exported it to stl and then reopened it with inventor and it does seem a little messed up

 

0 Likes
Message 13 of 13

Anonymous
Not applicable

Okay so as the community has said there are problems with the part file... i honestly have no idea what they are and i am so sorry for wasting your time and i thank you all for helping me with this... i have attached all my files, which includes .IPTs of 2 parts, .DWGs of both, .STL format of the parts, and PDFs of both DWGs, i know alot of this seems useless but the final result will be the STL and PDFs which would make them needed... i really want to fix it myself if someone could take the time to tell me what to add please? I reread the reply with details as to what i did wrong and it is actually very clear what i did wrong

0 Likes