Community
Fusion Manufacture
Talk shop with the Fusion (formerly Fusion 360) Manufacture Community. Share tool strategies, tips, get advice and solve problems together with the best minds in the industry.
cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Shoulder collides with stock. No collision warning. Invalid spiral length in simulation.

6 REPLIES 6
Reply
Message 1 of 7
hmnijp
438 Views, 6 Replies

Shoulder collides with stock. No collision warning. Invalid spiral length in simulation.

Incorrect simulation behavior detected in the community.

When using a cutter with a 10 mm long flute, 30 mm shoulder length, if you go to a depth of 20 - there is no collision warning.

The shoulder length is part of the tool shank, it cannot cut.
It should only be used as the maximum depth of cut, and show a stock collision error like the shank does.

But now the simulation uses the shoulder length as the flute length.
It is not right.

Yes, using multiple depth will warn you that the flute is not long enough, but the simulation will not show this ...

 

Снимок экрана 2021-01-15 121603.jpg

Снимок экрана 2021-01-15 121827.jpg

Снимок экрана 2021-01-15 130757.jpg

 

Labels (1)
  • CAM
6 REPLIES 6
Message 2 of 7
seth.madore
in reply to: hmnijp

Can you share your Fusion file?

File > Export > Save to local folder, return to thread and attach the .f3d file in your reply

 

 


Seth Madore
Customer Advocacy Manager - Manufacturing
Message 3 of 7
hmnijp
in reply to: seth.madore

this works for any example with the settings above, the file is not important.
In any type of simulation, the "flute length in the simulation" is equal to "tool_shoulderLength"
the tool cuts the workpiece with a shank and the simulation says its ok!

but with correct simulation there should be "flute length in the simulation" = "tool_fluteLength".

Message 4 of 7
seth.madore
in reply to: hmnijp

Yeah, but in your second image above, we can clearly see that a collision is occuring. Perhaps I'm misunderstanding what you'r running into?


Seth Madore
Customer Advocacy Manager - Manufacturing
Message 5 of 7
seth.madore
in reply to: hmnijp

Disregard above comment. I am seeing what you're talking about. Let me investigage. I've not personally run into this, as I use tools with appropriate lengths for the work I do.


Seth Madore
Customer Advocacy Manager - Manufacturing
Message 6 of 7
hmnijp
in reply to: seth.madore

in the second image I have changed the parameters of the tool (shoulder length = flute length) to show that the simulation is working correctly in this example.
It works, but the parameter "shoulder length" is lost (does not correspond to the real parameter of tools)

This is the case for an tool with a short flute and a reduced shoulder diameter (to avoid touching the wall)

typical cutting parameters for it:
maximum depth of cut = shoulder length
but the maximum stepdown < flute length

Снимок экрана 2021-01-15 163544.jpg

the only problem is simulation ...
("flute length in the simulation" = "tool_shoulderLength")
but should be
("flute length in the simulation" = "tool_fluteLength")

Message 7 of 7
maximilian.adami
in reply to: hmnijp

Hello, 

 

are there any updates on this? 

Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.

Post to forums  

Technology Administrators


Autodesk Design & Make Report