Fusion Manage Ideas

philipfrench · ‎09-19-2020

Item visibility is determined by workspace permissions, and Additional Ownership. But picklists and “Add Item” (to Bom, Managed Items, Relationships tab, etc) show me items that I do not have the ability to view. This allows one supplier to see the existence of parts belonging to another supplier. (Not the items themselves, but their descriptor / existence) Or when I add a document to my part, I can see that sensitive documents exist just by their descriptors. A supplier could see which of their competitors their customer is using, based on descriptors. I cannot deploy some Bom building functionality because Add Item is allowing a supplier to see other suppliers’ component descriptors, which are otherwise hidden from him. For backwards compatibility, please implement as a General Setting checkbox “Filter Picklists and ‘Add’ by item visibility” = Y/N (default is N). This will improve the data security when incorporating supplier chain users into FLC, and help roll-out to functions where descriptor visibility is required (ITAR, defense, financial documents etc)

bruce.nyfeler · ‎02-02-2024

In the attachments, you can download related or direct Attachments. Releated documents are all the files of related documents. If you want to do download all related documents from the top assembly, it is not possible to download all documents from the top assembly down to the individual part with one command. This would be great, if you have on the parts spez. and release documents, that has to be provieded to the customer. With one download all would be put together. No manually labour necessary.

ThomasRambach · ‎02-24-2023

All functionality in the classic interface should exist in the "Modern" interface, including the MIA Sourcing Tab. Please add this as it should be.

Anonymous · ‎12-01-2015

When adding an object to a BOM/Grid, we can choose from multiple workspaces as we have set up the system. However, the "Add items to Associations" window does not allow filtering on the workspace. It would be extremely useful to be able to search through a specific workspace. The example shown is trying to add contacts to a Customer. As shown, both the Customers and Suppliers workspaces show up.

PLM-Sylvain.Bailly · ‎07-27-2017

Hello all, Is it me or can the third-party license do a shared report even if they don’t have the permission (linked to the role)? Moreover, it would be great to not have the possibility to do a shared report if they do not have the right. Like it is designed, a supplier can do a shared report and have access to all the groups and users of FLC. For privacy/security, it is not really good because in the PLM, some suppliers compete with each other. So I propose to implement the “shared report” only if we give them the right and to have an option like a checkbox that the administrator creates and allows the user to say: “VISIBLE FROM OTHERS”. If you do not check it and do a shared report, the user is not visible in the list of users. This option can be implemented for the groups also. Thank you, Sylvain

Anonymous · ‎12-03-2012

We need access via the Server Side Sripting to both the BOM Tab & Sourcing Tab. I believe there are several support threads as well as Ideastation references to this functionality but I felt we needed a clear Idea Post for this functionality. Similar to the new object record item.workflowitems recently added we need to have information contained in the BOM & Sourcing tabs for use in scripting. An example would be having an assembly shown on an Sakes Quote Grid and a workflow that would explode the BOM children of that assembly into the grid of an RFQ and access the default supplier to create a master RFQ for cloning quoting purposes. Ideally this would be read/write access for back feed updating of costing etc.

johnny.buccola · ‎11-07-2016

Currently (as far as I know) there is only one sound way that you can limit the workspace items that a third party user can access -- Add them as an "Additional Owner" to the items they need to see, and then add the "View Items" role to their group for that workspace. (and intentionally omit the "view records owned by others" permission) Perhaps this is the wrong approach, but the major limitation is that "additional owners" cannot be imported in bulk -- therefore you must open each record individually, and add them as an owner -- including every item on the item's BOM (if it has one). Here are some possible quick solutions. All of these assume that the method above is the only way supplier access can be achieved: 1) Expand the "View Supplied Items" role for Suppliers workspaces, to actually allow the user to click through to the record they're sourced to in the workspace. (currently the list of supplied items will be shown, but the items themselves will be classified to the user if they click on them -- which seems to defeat the purpose of tab entirely -- this feels like the most obvious fix) 2) Similar to above, Expand the "View Related Items" role to allow a user to click through to the related items, as long as they're an owner on one of the items. 3) Allow import of "additional owners" 4) Add an option to allow access to all of the bom-items (children) of any parent item that is owned by a given user. This would make #3 far less critical of a function. Thanks!

sten · ‎02-04-2014

I have come to the conclusion that I cannot use the Sourcing workspaces in PLM because it forces me to use a: Item -> Supplier -> Manufacturer style sourcing. Our work area is electronics and "suppliers" are in our case primarly "distributors". I don't wan't the distributor to form the link between our parts and the manufacturers part number. The distributors are just middlemen and as long as they are reputable destributors I don't really where where the parts come from. The same way I don't care if the items are shipped FedEx or UPS. It would be nice if the Sourcing tab could support this.

mustafaemır2001 · ‎01-15-2022

I tried to buy from FUSION 360 app store but it works with paypal. In turkey paypal don't works so how can i buy something from FUSION 360 app store.

Anonymous · ‎12-03-2020

Hello Lads Isn't it time for Autodesk to get into simulating business? I meant like, "full body contact" get into... Since simulating business is kind of broad, let me explain a bit more what I would like to see. When i talk abut simulating i mean raw power, body's with muscle made out of steel, in speed faster then mind, with precision, making Chuck Norris crying like a child. And all this in a market, expanding faster then ever right now. Of cause i talk about industrial robot and process simulating. Almost all manufacturing industries want to make there processes automated. Making it a h**l of a time kind of fun/interesting to experience for us robot simulator/programmers. With all the tools Autodesk posse now, it can't be hard to develop something way beyond the tools on the market right now. And i must say, almost all of Autodesk's competitor is either on the market with their software OR have started to look in that direction at least. What i have seen ( as a user of this kind of software) is a simulating software market with maybe 10-15 different actors. And maybe, 2 or 3 of them is all right... not GOOD, but al right. And ALL if them is missing something. If it is not a software developed to just be able to handle ONE kind of robot brand, they lack knowledge of 3D modeling OR thy miss the possibility to add kinematics to dead 3D models and so it goes on and on with ALL of them. And the biggest issue is, they have not realized something Autodesk figured out long time ago. IF they make the software to expensive to company's and inaccessible to students they will miss the opportunity of a potential customer. You know, i have gone trough the market of software, and the pricing is horrible. Ending up, for a smaller company like mine, loosing my affairs to bigger automation company's witch can afford licenses of 20 000 - 120 000 € / year / license. Most of the customer demands simulating data, but not only that. To simulate an automation is way more effective then "trial and error" with physical, real robots like we do today. I have seen automations built halfway to be teared down again, someone realized we could not reach all the way with the robot as planned. The result of this will result in having only the big company's left, but no one know how to simulate since the license were to expensive during school time. Who will buy all the licenses then, one can wonder? Sorry for the long post, here comes "final pleading" at least. Help us, Obi Wan Autodesk. You're our only hope.

Fusion

Picklists and “Add item” should only show descriptors of items I am allowed to view.

Bulk download for a complete assembly

Sourcing Tab: "Modern" Interface

Please add workspace filter for adding items to associations.

Shared report permission + visibility users/groups

Scripting Access BOM & Sourcing Tab

Enhanced Third-Party and Workspace Item View Permissions

A more flexible supplier/sourcing tab

fusion 360 app store payment

Pure robot simulating

Forums Links