Section Analysis ... by component

Section Analysis ... by component

MichaelT_123
Advisor Advisor
256 Views
1 Reply
Message 1 of 2

Section Analysis ... by component

MichaelT_123
Advisor
Advisor

Hi FusionFellows,

 

As promised in:

https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-design-validate-document/section-analysis-by-component/td-p/94...

 

Here are some visuals of the Section Analysis imposed on the mechanism of the Roller Screw. I am not entirely satisfied with the outcome, but there were and perhaps still are some F360 section analysis handlers deficiencies that I barely managed to bypass.

Performing such analysis at the final stage of the Fusion graphical path is highly inefficient and tedious and requires juggling space and planes in an unintuitive way.

In order to achieve a viable outcome, the task must be attacked in the early stage of screen render composition.

From a software point of view, it necessitates a low level of graphic driver programming. Quite a task !!! Would it be possible, considering the current F360 internal architecture? Let’s call the question rhetoric.

RollerScrew_FG_mono_200.jpg

 

 

RollerScrew_FG_arcd_200.jpg

 

RollerScrew_FG_arcd_450.jpg

 

Attached files:

RollerScrew_FG_mono.mp4             4K_mono       (102 ΜΒ)    https://a360.co/3SMJ3dc

RollerScrew_FG_mono_200.png      4K_mono       (6.4 ΜΒ)    https://a360.co/4kuzzz1

RollerScrew_FG_mono_450.png      4K_mono       (4,6 ΜΒ)    https://a360.co/4k3aueM

RollerScrew_FG_arcd.mp4               4K_stereo      (176 ΜΒ)    https://a360.co/4k8Z7lF

RollerScrew_FG_arcd_200.png        4K_stereo      (8,6 ΜΒ)    https://a360.co/4ksEvo1

RollerScrew_FG_arcd_450.png        4K_stereo      (6,8 ΜΒ)    https://a360.co/43vdqdi

 

To be viewed on 4K media devices (monitors, UHD TVs, projectors...) of reasonable performance. For the best experience, use stand-alone media applications (WMP, VLC) and the native resolution 3840x2160 - full screen. The '_arcd' files require an anaglyph red/cyan glasses, while '_al' is for active shutter glasses 3D hardware (~30° viewing angle is recommended). Download the files over a network, where the cost of doing so is not a concern. The files are to be used for private, non-commercial purposes only.

 

Related:

https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-design-validate-document/propeller-marine/m-p/12981271

https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/fusion-design-validate-document/analysis-section/m-p/8884405

 

Regards

MichaelT

MichaelT
0 Likes
257 Views
1 Reply
Reply (1)
Message 2 of 2

MichaelT_123
Advisor
Advisor

Hi FFellows,

 

I have found … 6-years-old files representing ‘section analysis’ (also a ‘roller screw’ assembly), but done in the more ‘traditional’ way.

‘Section cuts’ are represented by ‘surrogate bodies’, which obviously required some design but very intuitive intervention.

Which method is  ‘better’? The one presented in the foundation section of the post, or the one below? It would indeed be a matter of taste. However, it is obvious (at least to me) that the latter, a 6-year-old, was much easier to implement.

RollerScrew_B_5K_49.png

 

RollerScrew_B_5K_16.png

 

RollerScrew_B_5K_25.png

 

Attached files:

RollerScrew_B_arcd.mp4                4K_stereo      (386 ΜΒ)    https://a360.co/4nnu2N2

RollerScrew_B_mono.mp4             4K_mono       (136 ΜΒ)     https://a360.co/3I2oRlA

RollerScrew_B_mono_16.png        5K_mono       (4.5 ΜΒ)     https://a360.co/4kjhSSK

RollerScrew_B_mono_25.png        5K_mono       (4,5 ΜΒ)     https://a360.co/44BCGjA

RollerScrew_B_mono_49.png        5K_mono       (3,6 ΜΒ)     https://a360.co/4emFXqg

 

Regards

MichaelT

MichaelT
0 Likes