how do i handle revisions?

how do i handle revisions?

Anonymous
Not applicable
668 Views
6 Replies
Message 1 of 7

how do i handle revisions?

Anonymous
Not applicable

I've always had a problem with my revisions getting messy sometimes there's like 60 of them.

Made this pin slot hinge and now they say its to elaborate and they just want a pipe welded on the end. Before i go notching and adding a pipe, what do i do with the old components that are there now? 

Should i copy the file and modify the new file? or turn the visibility off and model over the same spot?  Or just delete the old components? I would like to keep this modeled like this for the future. You never know people change their minds like every 5 sec. lol.pin slot pic.png

0 Likes
669 Views
6 Replies
Replies (6)
Message 2 of 7

g-andresen
Consultant
Consultant

Hi,


@Anonymous wrote:

 .... or turn the visibility off and model over the same spot?  


That's my way with these things.

 

günther

Message 3 of 7

laughingcreek
Mentor
Mentor

when ever I send ANYTHING out of my office, to ANYBODY, such as a client or a fabricator  That particular version gets saved to a separate place and is NEVER EDITED AGAIN.  I save this and also the means of transmition. (email etc.)  If they reply back confirming they got the email , model etc, I save that also.  (if they don't confirm receipt, I ask them if they got it.) 

 

When things get confused and convoluted  in the various brains involved, and that happens a lot, you can double check for yourself what you sent out to the world, and you can prove to a client what version they should have been working from. 

Message 4 of 7

Anonymous
Not applicable

Thanks, that is some really good advice. I will definitely  follow it. Just curios how your saving each revision separate and keeping things organized. Can you share a little of the process? I"m more fabricator than cad designer thanks.

0 Likes
Message 5 of 7

Anonymous
Not applicable

I made a copy and edited that one. I hope it doesn't link back to the original.greenhouse trolly pipe sled.png

0 Likes
Message 6 of 7

GRSnyder
Collaborator
Collaborator

I'm confused by this whole thread. May I inquire as to why none of you are relying on F360's built-in versioning? It seems like all you'd have to do is enter "First version sent to XYZ Corp" in the comment field and you'd be good to go.

 

I know more about software version control than the ECO world, but in that context it's considered a clear antipattern to carry forward obsolete design elements. It's all under version control; if you ever need that stuff again, you know right where to find it. There's no point in cluttering up the current version.

Message 7 of 7

laughingcreek
Mentor
Mentor

My habits of documenting correspondence with anyone outside my office, particularly when money or reputation are involved, pre-date fusion.  For that matter it predates email, when everything was done on paper.  But I digress.

 

I'm unlikely to send a full working model to a client or fabricator.  There's not much in there they really need (unless they are paying me for the actual parametric model, but that's not the norm for me).  THAT version gets saved in an appropriate location and documented as the file that was sent and received.   And THAT version never gets changed again.  it becomes a reference document.

 

Of course I make version notes in my working model as to what was sent, etc.  But that's useless to someone outside of my office.  particularly if they don't use fusion, or don't have a great understanding of how the "cloud" works.  And heaven forbid things get in to the legal realm (been lucky so far).   "look, see, that's the version we all agreed on, see it says right there in my comments.  wait, what? I have to freeze my entire account to insure I don't change anything during legal discovery?!" 

 

If it makes sense to carry on from where I am in MY model, I certainly will.  or I my save it out to create a branch design direction.  Or I may start over.  multiple times.  Now I have a directory full of files with similar names, all with various version comments.  Quite a web of info.  Not something I want to explain to customers or clients.  When the client or fabricator starts saying things like "I thought we were going to do this or that " and has obviously started to confuse the facts of the project, it's important to be able to trace back to a specific file that was sent out.  having multiple files with similar names, each with multiple versions and comments, doesn't really serve that purpose well.