data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/369aa/369aa4a10ade7ce708b68b0fbc08f225c578c307" alt=""
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report
Hi, I am a student working on a project and wanted to see if I had the right idea as to my workflow. Hopefully you all will be able to save me several hours of time.
We are trying to determine if the as-built conditions match the design of a simple gravel road subdivision facing serious erosion issues. We have the subdivision surveyed and have a surface, alignment, and corridor developed for the existing conditions. We have it set up displaying the existing elevation profiles cross sections, but we are running into issues comparing it to the design. This part seems to be going well.
So far, I have the a surface developed using the topo sheets from the design documents. This was from adding elevation data to the 2D polylines and creating it that way. Here is where we are running into issues. The surface is at a different scale than the existing conditions, and when trying to use the align function using the known points it will only align to a single point rather than the three we're selecting. It also not scaling.
My goal was to overlay the two surfaces and corridors onto each other, and have the cross sections overlay onto each other. I'm hoping somewhere in there I can pull out the total volume required.
Am I going in the right direction? I have the design cross sections, would it be easier to compare the existing conditions to these directly vs. the surface created by topo? Our ultimate goal is to tell the client which sections need fill. Any assistance would be greatly appreciated. Thanks
Solved! Go to Solution.