@davidpaulstanley wrote:
“…most exhibition halls and rigging teams I work with still use Autocad. So I'd still like to explore this product.”
I agree you get what you pay for, but at some point, maybe a person might be happiest paying for both. I can say with certainty that in what could loosely be called the “entertainment industry,” it is an advantage in terms of convenience and career opportunities to have a working knowledge of both AutoCAD and VW.
Yes, content can be exported/imported between the two. And yes, VW certainly has “niche” features and abilities “out of the box” that are not natively available in AutoCAD.
But if the majority of one’s collaborators are using AutoCAD, where is the harm in exploring AutoCAD?
While AutoCAD may not have the nifty “built ins,” in my opinion it has a lot more going for it in terms of (easily) customizing one’s own automation.
And fun. I have never found VW to be fun to use. Pre-determined work flows without much room for creativity. Try a Youtube search for “Vectorworks macro” and see how far a person needs to scroll before hitting the AutoCAD videos.
Not very far.
And the Google gets a person stuff like this:
https://forum.vectorworks.net/index.php?/topic/49044-macro-to-switch-from-imperial-to-metric-standar...
Uffda.
Creating a one button toggle might not be the easiest thing in AutoCAD either, but it would take all of five minutes to make one command that changes -DWGUNITS and -UNITS to metric and decimal and another command that changes them back to imperial and architectural, if that was all a person wanted to do. And the changes could apply to “dimension objects” and not just “dimension display.” If one used -DIMSTYLE then maybe APPLY with maybe a CROSSING selection…lots of options…
Not sure how to get a “SysBeep;” though…so if one really wanted to have that…and dialogue boxes…then maybe the extra dough for VW is worth it.
Still better off though I think learning both for the performing arts. VW especially for lighting design.