Cannot delete 1:1 scale from Annotative block

Cannot delete 1:1 scale from Annotative block

bull504
Enthusiast Enthusiast
2,402 Views
27 Replies
Message 1 of 28

Cannot delete 1:1 scale from Annotative block

bull504
Enthusiast
Enthusiast

Ever since upgrading to Autocad 2025, any annotative blocks that contain attributes that are inserted into a drawing always contain the 1:1 scale attached to them and it cannot be deleted. Example, the elevation callout below was inserted on a 3/4" scale but comes in with the 1:1 also. In previous versions it would only have the 3/4" scale attached. I cannot delete the 1:1 from the block. Anyone know what is going on? 

 

bull504_0-1734021885822.png

 

0 Likes
Accepted solutions (2)
2,403 Views
27 Replies
Replies (27)
Message 2 of 28

-didier-
Advisor
Advisor

Bonjour @bull504 

 

This is the normal behavior of the software.
AutoCAD needs this scale coefficient as it needs layer 0 and the line type "continuous".

This is the minimum, which cannot be purged

 

Amicalement

Éternel débutant.. my site for learning : Programmer dans AutoCAD

DA

EESignature

0 Likes
Message 3 of 28

cadffm
Consultant
Consultant

Hi,

 

 

>>"was inserted on a 3/4" scale"

Do you mean "while 3/4" scale was active (CANNOSCALE) ?

 

>>"but comes in with the 1:1 also"

How do you insert the blockreference? Is it different if you are using CLASSICINSERT command (while CANNOSCALE is set to 3/4")

?

 

>>" I cannot delete the 1:1 from the block. "

Sounds impossible, please share a sample .dwg (with only one fresh insert), thx.

Sebastian

0 Likes
Message 4 of 28

cadffm
Consultant
Consultant

@-didier- 

That's (near to) true, but we are talking about OBJECT SCALEs, not about the defined scale list in the file!

Sebastian

Message 5 of 28

bull504
Enthusiast
Enthusiast

@-didier- @cadffm 

Correct, I am specifically referring to the objects scales. I understand 1:1 is required for the drawing scale list. I am not trying to remove it from the drawing, just the object. Which is how I've usually done it for 10 years. How it is behaving now in the 2025 version is completely new. 

0 Likes
Message 6 of 28

bull504
Enthusiast
Enthusiast

1) yes, while 3/4" was the active scale of CANNOSCALE

2)Block is inserted via a tool palette. Using the CLASSICINSERT command the block behaves appropriately as long as I edit the attributes to be non-annotative within the block

3) Attached drawing, Side note, this only affects blocks with attributes, it does not happen with other annotative objects such as dimensions. It's annoying because If I am working with 2 scales (3/4" and 1/2") when I change my CANNOSCALE accordingly, I can no longer read objects on the previous scale because they will default to 1:1 for anything not on the currently active CANNOSCALE

0 Likes
Message 7 of 28

AdamPJN3D
Explorer
Explorer

I'm having the exact same issue. I'd love a solution. I recently updated to 2025, I never had this behaviour in my older version. The problem seems to be related to the palette and inserting blocks with text. Possibly annotative text styles.

Message 8 of 28

baccioni
Participant
Participant

Any solution to this? This is quite a significant issue:

If I import an annotative block from my Palette with the drawing scale set to 1:50, the block comes with a double scale property, 1:50 and, always, a 1:1 undeletable scale. 

So it happens that if I set the drawing scale at 1:20 and I set "Show annotation scale" to always,The block uses the geometry at 1:50  and the text at scale 1:1, rendering the text barely visible and offset

0 Likes
Message 9 of 28

pendean
Community Legend
Community Legend

@baccioni For the most part we end users cannot change the behavior of the software. Sorry.

 

Ask Autodesk to change it (back?) in future versions here

 https://www.autodesk.com/company/contact-us/product-feedback

 

0 Likes
Message 10 of 28

baccioni
Participant
Participant

No dude. Undetrstand my words. This is a bug or something I miss that cjhanged. It's never been like that. It started in 2025. 

When I insert an annotative block from the Palette it's inserted with a bugged 1:1 scale.

If I insert the block (previously inserted fromt the Tool Palette, hence already in the drawing) from the Block insert Palette, it works perfectly.
These are both blocks inserted at 1:100. The one above comes from Tool Palette

baccioni_0-1738761822803.png

See the scales

 

baccioni_1-1738761877622.pngbaccioni_2-1738761908711.png

This is what happens when Annoallvisible is set to 1 and drawing scale is set to 1:50

The blocks are the same. But the one with the messed up text comes from the tool palette

 

baccioni_3-1738762073532.png

 

 

 

Message 11 of 28

paullimapa
Mentor
Mentor

Have you downloaded and installed the 2025.1.1 update? Perhaps that may make a difference 


Paul Li
IT Specialist
@The Office
Apps & Publications | Video Demos
0 Likes
Message 12 of 28

cadffm
Consultant
Consultant

@bull504 @baccioni @AdamPJN3D 

Yes, something wrong with the TP insertion tool in this case.

I can't test it today,  and not tomorrow, with the newest ACAD2025.1.1 (are you all tested with Acad Productversion 2025.1.1 / released October 29, 2024)?

and my test in December is long time ago, so I can't remember the tested version.

 

Anyway, I think the problem will be solved with the next product (not product update).

Let's call it a vision.

But: It probably won't solve the problem with existing block references.

I hadn't looked into an edit to remove the scale in December.

Maybe I or someone else will find time to do that.

Sebastian

0 Likes
Message 13 of 28

baccioni
Participant
Participant

Yes Sebastian, I'm using the latest update. I tried to redefine the blocks using design center, tried to resave the block, but nothing seems to work. I can't get rid of the 1:1 scale from the block pasted straight from TP (or pasted from blocks coming straight from TP; only if I reinsert the block from BP I get rid of the 1:1 scale). Hence I have a few hundreds of corrupted blocks that won't display text. The worst happens in nested blocks. I hoped to find a way to isolate the blocks with a specific annotative scale (the corrupted 1:1) but it seems that neither QS nor Filter can do that. I  think I can access that with Autolisp+ActiveX, but I have not yet tried it. If you stumble upon something, I'd appreciate if  you let me know.

KR,

Roberto

0 Likes
Message 14 of 28

cadffm
Consultant
Consultant

So it is still a problem with TP in 2025.1.1 

(does it work if you don't have annotation objects inside the block? What is useless, so test it)

 

Test only in new files, where all blocks not pressent.

 

-

 

We need to wait for the next update or program version.

 

Sebastian

0 Likes
Message 15 of 28

baccioni
Participant
Participant

It seems so.

The bug shows with Annotative blocks that contain text (attributes, plain text etc.), when imported through TP.
Blocks without annotations perform regularly.

Blocks with annotations have this 1:1 bugged scale addition that messes up text display.
Blocks with annotations imported through TP and duplicated through BP (block insert palette) get rid of the bug.
If it's not a bug and someone knows of a new behavior of 2025 that provokes this, and how to manage it, please let me know.

Message 16 of 28

cadffm
Consultant
Consultant

I am not sure if you tested what I asked for (sorry, my english 😶), so let me ask again:

You said:

"The bug shows with Annotative blocks that contain                           text (attributes, plain text etc.), when imported through TP."

I am hoping

"The bug shows with Annotative blocks that contain ANNOTATIVE text (attributes, plain text etc.), when imported through TP."

 

Please verify that (I couldn't read about this in your reply)

BEDIT on of your blocks in question,

Command: (sssetfirst nil (ssget "_X" (list'(-3 ("AcadAnnotative"))(cons 410 (getvar 'CTAB)))))

If some objects are selected: Properties Palette [CTRL]+[1], Turn Annotation = No

Command:_BSAVEAS testblock

create a TP insertion tool and test it with this block.

 

Still an issue?

If so, I was wrong with my idea.

 

 

 

>>"Blocks with annotations imported through TP and duplicated through BP (block insert palette) get rid of the bug."

Because the block is always okay, we are talking about INSERTS (Blockreferences of this Block) and TP,

the TP insertion tool creates a bug for these Inserts.

Sebastian

0 Likes
Message 17 of 28

baccioni
Participant
Participant

What's your language Sebastian? If it's spanish I can read it. Also French. And Italian. 

0 Likes
Message 18 of 28

baccioni
Participant
Participant

In any case I tried Annotative blocks with annotative and non annotative text. If that is the question. And it's not working.

Message 19 of 28

cadffm
Consultant
Consultant

Alemán, no frech, no espanol, no italiano, Sólo conocimientos rudimentarios de inglés o alemán.

 

Yes, that was the question: It also fails with blocks that do not contain any annotative objects like attributes or text, mtext, hatches or block references too?

Your answer is Yes, so the only things you can do are

- don't use TP or

- check out a way by programming to get rid of the wrong connection of scale&blockreference

- wait for the next release and cross your fingers

 

 

Sebastian

0 Likes
Message 20 of 28

baccioni
Participant
Participant

@cadffm wrote:

Alemán, no frech, no espanol, no italiano, Sólo conocimientos rudimentarios de inglés o alemán.

 

Yes, that was the question: It also fails with blocks that do not contain any annotative objects like attributes or text, mtext, hatches or block references too?

Your answer is Yes, so the only things you can do are

- don't use TP or

I will switch to Block Palette Libraries, using my Tool Palette files as sources. This works. Not ideal, but works.

 

- check out a way by programming to get rid of the wrong connection of scale&blockreference

I will think about that. I'm too busy now with a fast paced project. 

 

- wait for the next release and cross your fingers

well... crossing fingers rarely works. I'm still waiting for the solution to pc3 bug that was raised in 2024, and never solved.