Re: Parallax Stretch?

Re: Parallax Stretch?

Anonymous
Not applicable
1,338 Views
9 Replies
Message 1 of 10

Re: Parallax Stretch?

Anonymous
Not applicable
AutoCAD 2015. Use it for architectural purposes (I believe myself
proficient, but by no means expert).



It’s just a general question.

Actually, I had something weird like this happen once, but I don’t know how
it happened and can’t recreate it.

Probably that, along with simply wondering about it brought me to ask the
question. It could apply to any object in a drawing.



Is the Layout Curve command available in ACAD 2015?



I’d rather not have to make anything a block.

Also, what if the objects are not identical (also, pre-existing in the
drawing)? Like a door, a window, and a piano (so, individual blocks – but
could be anything, I guess)?



Thank you!


0 Likes
1,339 Views
9 Replies
Replies (9)
Message 2 of 10

Anonymous
Not applicable

For if this was an AutoCAD command:

(my written notes don't account for a third group being chosen, as seen on sketch #2 - sorry)

I don't know if this is the right way to do this but, please see my sketches...PSTRETCH-1.jpgPSTRETCH-2.jpg

0 Likes
Message 3 of 10

dbroad
Mentor
Mentor

 I have a custom command that does that but I keep such things to myself as competitive advantages. In any case, if you're not using AutoCAD Architecture, this newsgroup isn't really the right forum.  I would suggest one of the AutoCAD customization forums. Only AutoCAD Architecture has layout curves but AutoCAD has dimensional contraints.  It doesn't sound like you want to invest any time in setup though, which dimensional contraints do require.

Architect, Registered NC, VA, SC, & GA.
0 Likes
Message 4 of 10

Anonymous
Not applicable
It’s not that I don’t want to invest the time, but don’t the dimensional
constraints require that you combine all of your objects into one dynamic
block?

Alternately, is there a way to transfer this post to another forum without
recreating the question in another post?

Thank you so much.


0 Likes
Message 5 of 10

dbroad
Mentor
Mentor

No, dimensional constraints don't have to be wrapped into a block.  Each group of objects would probably need to be a block or a group though.  Groups require no overhead to create though.  For what you seem to want to do, I normally use associative arrays but that only works if all the object groups are identical.

 

My stretchn command is used where there is a true need to stretch, not just move n times, spreading the displacement between the parts.

Architect, Registered NC, VA, SC, & GA.
0 Likes
Message 6 of 10

john.uhden
Mentor
Mentor

Do you also spend time hanging out with your alien ancestors?

John F. Uhden

0 Likes
Message 7 of 10

Anonymous
Not applicable

I don't get this one.

0 Likes
Message 8 of 10

john.uhden
Mentor
Mentor

An alternate parallax sounds like something I've heard of from some television show about alien ancestors, or maybe Area 51, or maybe The Twilight Zone or The X Files.  I just don't know what a parallax is.  Plus I like to pester Doug.  He is such a good sport.  I think people tend to tease those whom they consider superior.

John F. Uhden

0 Likes
Message 9 of 10

Anonymous
Not applicable

Oh. Very good then.

I didn't know either until I was trying to find a way to describe what I was seeing in my head. I googled things like "what is it called when you're driving and closer things are moving faster than things far away".

So, anyway... I'm not an ACAD genius or anything. I'm still a bit confused; but maybe this is just a pipe dream.

Thanks!

0 Likes
Message 10 of 10

Anonymous
Not applicable

Hello. I tried applying dimensional constraints to no avail. I'm probably not doing it right.

Is there a trick I'm not utilizing?

0 Likes