Hi Everyone
thanks for the replies. I consider myself a pretty well knowledgeable person when it comes to databases and i have a good established background of Inventor and how a good set up works (based on single project, not Vault). I cant help though to not fully understand the reasoning in preferring local vs shared.
I read the replies as every Vault user will have a local copy of the server & client. The server manages the files and the clients provides access to check in / out. Its already been said that the server would installed on a C drive. wouldnt that then create a new database for all users independently? If thats the case, the databases would need to communicate with each other in order to be able to track the changes.
Its going to be an almost impossible task to change a Companies complete folder structure from a shared environment after all, that's supposed to be the purpose of servers & centralization.
I would have expected:
Vault server installed on a server machine
Vault Client installed on users machines
Users check in / out files from the central location on the server
while checked out, files are not updateable (thus removing opportunities for latest version duplication's)
Seeing as Vault is SQL server based, the client only requires a connection string to gain access.
Now please dont get me wrong, im a not questioning anyone here or challenging their set ups, i am only trying to rationalise what i am reading vs how i would expect a multi user server system controlling files should work
Thanks
Nacho
Nacho
Automation & Design Engineer
Inventor automation Programmer (C#, VB.Net / iLogic)
Furniture, Sheet Metal, Structural, Metal fab, Tradeshow, Fabrication, CNC

Did you find this post helpful? Feel free to Like this post.
Did your question get successfully answered? Then click on the ACCEPT SOLUTION button.