Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
Show only
|
Search instead for
Did you mean:
This page has been translated for your convenience with an automatic translation service. This is not an official translation and may contain errors and inaccurate translations. Autodesk does not warrant, either expressly or implied, the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the information translated by the machine translation service and will not be liable for damages or losses caused by the trust placed in the translation service.Translate
[ Stingray + Maya Improvements ] PhysX Should Know There's a Hole in a Torus
[ Stingray + Maya Improvements ] PhysX Should Know There's a Hole in a Torus
Hi. PhysX should not disregard the hole in the mesh when it's applying the collision bounds. This is crucial for torus like shapes like chains especially and donuts or a pipe where objects must go through. It has to be easy to apply this type of collision bound much. It do how Blender (has the easiest to use physics) and Unreal Engine does it, it's just a click away and wraps itself precisely around an into the object taking the shape of a chain for example without disregarding the hole in the chain. No need to edit it.
You can do this by setting the physics actor type to mesh in the unit editor when creating your physics actors. This will be used for collisions and not simulations.
______________________________________ Dan Matlack Senior Content Manager || Games Solutions Autodesk, Inc.
