I am using Simulation Mechanical 2012.
I have a beam and I have applied a temperature to each end of the beam to look at temperature distribution along the beam.
Under certain conditions, my results will show temperatures far outside the range of my 2 initial applied temperatures. My initial temperatures are 90F and 110F and my results can show between -130F and 190F.
It gets into this mode when I increase my total number of elements by either changing the size of my mesh or increasing the length of my beam. As best that I can tell, I have this problem above 100,000 elements.
Help would be appreciated.
Solved! Go to Solution.
Solved by John_Holtz. Go to Solution.
Has the service pack already been released?
I cannot upload a file that big so I have attached a few screenshots.
Is there another method to post the fem file?
Summary Log:
Autodesk (R) Simulation Steady-State Heat Transfer Version 2012.01.00.0017-W64/X64 15-Jun-2011 Copyright (c) 2011, Autodesk, Inc. All rights reserved. DATE: JULY 5, 2012 TIME: 09:06 AM Input Model: H:\FEA\Plain Beam\Rod.ds_data\1\ds PROGRAM VERSION: 201201000017 ALG.DLL VERSION: 201201000017 AlgConfig.DLL VERSION: 201201000017 Agsdb_AR.DLL VERSION: 201201000017 AMGSolve.DLL VERSION: 201201000017 AlgSolve.DLL VERSION: 201201000017 **** Model Unit System Settings: -------------------------------------------- Unit System : English (in) Force : lbf Length : in Time : s Temperature (Absolute) : deg F (R) Thermal Energy : in*lbf Voltage : V Current : A Electrical Resistance : ohm Mass : lbf*s^2/in -------------------------------------------- Thermal **** CONTROL INFORMATION number of node points = 182701 number of element types = 2 analysis type code = 10 equations per block = 0 bandwidth minimization flag = 0 **** PHYSICAL CONSTANTS USED WHEN APPLICABLE The Stefan-Boltzmann Constant = 3.083E-11 Temperature Increment to Absolute = 4.597E+02 **** NON-LINEAR ITERATION CONTROL PARAMETERS Nonlinear control option = OFF Convergence criterion = 2 Maximum number of iterations = 15 Interval for monitoring = 5 Corrective tolerance = 1.0000E-03 Relative tolerance = 1.0000E-03 Relaxation parameter = 1.0000E+00 **** PRINT OF NODAL DATA SUPPRESSED **** PRINT OF EQUATION NUMBERS SUPPRESSED **** FLUID FLOW CONVECTION IS NOT INCLUDED IN THIS MODEL. **** HARD DISK FILE SIZE INFORMATION FOR PROCESSOR: Available hard disk space on H drive = 38276.797 megabytes **** LOAD CASE MULTIPLIERS Boundary temperature multiplier 1.000 Convection multiplier 1.000 Radiation multiplier 1.000 Heat generation multiplier 1.000 **** AMG SOLVER CONTROL INFORMATION Convergence Tolerance = 1.000E-06 Maximum Iteration Number = 1000 AMG log output level = -1 **** Invoking Iterative AMG Solver ... **** End solution **** TEMPORARY FILE STORAGE (MEGABYTES) ---------------------------------- UNIT NO. 7 : 1.394 UNIT NO. 8 : 7.710 UNIT NO. 9 : 0.040 UNIT NO. 10 : 0.040 UNIT NO. 11 : 265.467 UNIT NO. 12 : 0.000 UNIT NO. 13 : 0.040 UNIT NO. 14 : 0.000 UNIT NO. 15 : 0.040 UNIT NO. 18 : 0.040 UNIT NO. 65 : 1.394 UNIT NO. 67 : 85.904 TOTAL : 362.070 **** End of File ****
Hi,
My guess is that you can get accurate results by reducing the "Stiffness" of the Controlled Temperatures. According to the documentation, the stiffness should be "(2-3 orders of magnitude higher than the conductivity of the materials in your model)".
Can't find what you're looking for? Ask the community or share your knowledge.